Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Phase 1 cardiovascular rehabilitation: be aggressive?

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery20116:140

DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-140

Received: 4 October 2011

Accepted: 17 October 2011

Published: 17 October 2011

Background

It is well known that the most common respiratory complications after cardiac surgery are related to sternotomy, extracorporeal circulation and its inflammatory reaction [1]. Phase 1 cardiovascular rehabilitation is widely indicated to minimize the adverse effects of cardiac surgery, including respiratory function [2, 3]. However, is there a critical day to physiotherapists?

The study by Moreno et al [4] is very important and adds important information to what we know about respiratory function and physiotherapy after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to assess the pulmonary function in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery treated with a physiotherapy protocol. The authors showed that the day 3 after cardiac surgery showed the worst values of forced vital capacity, maximal inspiratory pressure and maximal expiratory pressure in the follow up of 30 days. However, the authors did not show data about the incidence of atelectasis and pulmonary complications along the follow up. The results showed by Moreno et al [4], raised some questions: should physiotherapists be more aggressive in the third day after surgery? If yes, could the aggressive intervention impact in lung complications and survival?

This way, new trials are important to elucidate the best physiotherapy strategy in patients after cardiac surgery. Moreover, to investigate if an aggressive physiotherapy in the worst period of lung function after cardiac surgery decreases the incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary complications and improves patients survival.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Insuficiência Cardíaca e Transplante do Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP (InCor HC-FMUSP)

References

  1. Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy M, Shroyer AL, VillaNueva CB, O'Brein M: Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA. 1999, 281: 1298-303. 10.1001/jama.281.14.1298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stein R, Maia CP, Silveira AD, Chiappa GR, Myers J, Ribeiro JP: Inspiratory muscle strength as a determinant of functional capacity early after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009, 90: 1685-91. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Herbst-Rodrigues MV, Carvalho VO, Auler JOC, Feltrim MIZ: PEEP-ZEEP technique: Cardiorespiratory repercussions in mechanically ventilated patients submitted to a coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 6: 108-10.1186/1749-8090-6-108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Moreno AM, Castro RR, Sorares PP, Sant' Anna M, Cravo SL, Nóbrega AC: Longitudinal evaluation the pulmonary function of the pre and postoperative periods in the coronary artery bypass graft surgery of patients treated with a physiotherapy protocol. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 6: 62-67. 10.1186/1749-8090-6-62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Carvalho; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement