Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and factors related to NIV

From: Aggressive treatment with noninvasive ventilation for mild acute hypoxemic respiratory failure after cardiovascular surgery: Retrospective observational study

 

Total

Successful

Reintubation

P value

Number of patients (%)

94

89 (94%)

5 (6%)

 

Age; years

67 ± 9

68 ± 9

63 ± 8

0.1995

Sex; female/male

30/64

29/60

1/4

0.5569

APACHE II score

15 ± 5

15 ± 5

18 ± 4

0.1793

SAPS II

28 ± 7

28 ± 7

30 ± 6

0.5717

Hypertension; n (%)

63

62 (70%)*

1 (20%)

0.0215

Diabetes mellitus; n (%)

38

36 (40%)

2 (40%)

0.9841

Renal replacement therapy; n (%)

20

19 (21%)

1 (20%)

0.9429

Reasons for AHRF; n (%)

    

Cardiac pulmonary edema

58

56 (63%)

2 (40%)

0.3049

Atelectasis

26

24 (27%)

2 (40%)

0.5261

ALI

9

8 (9%)

1 (20%)

0.4155

Exacerbation of COPD

1

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

0.8117

Mode of NIV; n (%)

    

CPAP

85

82 (92%)

3 (60%)

0.0586

Bilevel-PAP

9

7 (8%)

2 (40%)

0.0586

PEEP (cmH2O)

7 ± 2

7 ± 2

7 ± 2

0.8293

Pressure support (cmH2O)

4 ± 2

4 ± 1

4 ± 3

1

Time from hypoxemia to starting NIV (h)

2 ± 2

2 ± 2

3 ± 3

0.5394

Time from extubation to NIV (h)

20 ± 20

21 ± 21

8 ± 9

0.1638

NIV duration (h)

31 ± 24

32 ± 23

24 ± 37

0.1112

  1. Data are shown as the mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.
  2. NIV, noninvasive ventilation; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SAPS, Simplified Acute Physiology Score; AHRF, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure; ALI, acute lung injury; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; Bilevel-PAP, bilevel-positive airway pressure; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure.
  3. *P < 0.05 vs. reintubation group.