Skip to main content

Table 4 The Δs (differences between preoperative and 5 years postoperative values) in the measurement of echocardiographic parameters were evaluated individually (univariate regression) and jointly (multivariable regression) as predictor of recurrent mitral valve regurgitation. Abbreviations and acronyms: IPD = interpapillary distance;LVEDD = left ventricular end diastolic diameter;LVESD = left ventricular end systolic diameter

From: Interpapillary muscle distance independently predicts recurrent mitral regurgitation

Predictors of Recurrent ≥ 3 + Mitral Regurgitation

Predictor

Univariate

Multivariable

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

Δ of α-Angle

1.13

1.03 | 1.25

 < 0.01

1.1

0.78 | 1.50

0.55

Δ of β-Angle

1.03

1.01 | 1.05

 < 0.01

1

0.94 | 1.09

0.88

Δ of Tenting Area

2.01

1.06 | 4.03

0.04

0.28

0.05 | 0.88

0.40

Δ of LVESD

1.43

1.20 | 1.77

 < 0.01

1.44

0.98 | 2.27

0.07

Δ of LVEDD

1.33

1.16 | 1.57

 < 0.01

1.1

0.76 | 1.62

0.6

Δ of IPMD

2.69

1.24 | 6.34

0.01

2.55

1.01 | 7.24

0.05

  1. Legend: The Δs (differences between preoperative and 5 years postoperative values) in the measurement of echocardiographic parameters were evaluated individually (univariate regression) and jointly (multivariable regression) as predictor of recurrent mitral valve regurgitation. Abbreviations and acronyms: IPD,  interpapillary distance; LVEDD, left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVESD,  left ventricular end systolic diameter