Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of side effects of oxytetracycline and talc pleurodesis: an experimental study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin McCusker
4 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - koray dural
26 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - AYTEN KAYICANGIR
6 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Berkant ¿zpolat
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Berkant ¿zpolat
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
13 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1749-8090-5-128

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement