Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Five-year follow-up of angiographic disease progression after medicine, angioplasty, or surgery

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
23 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Farkouh
22 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jorge Chiquie Borges
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Farkouh
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
26 Oct 2010 Editorially accepted
26 Oct 2010 Article published 10.1186/1749-8090-5-91

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.