Cases | CABG | QCA stenosis % in the LAD proximally to the LIMA anastomosis | Cause of the competitive flow | Proof of the competitive flow |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LIMA-LAD SVGA-RCA | 48% | Non- significant LAD lesion + patent LIMA side branch | angiogram |
2 | LIMA-LAD RIMA-RCA | 53% | Non-significant LAD lesion | angiogram + FFR = 0.83 |
3 | LIMA-LAD SVGA-LCx | 57% | Non-significant LAD lesion | angiogram + FFR = 0.89 |
4 | 1st: LIMA-LAD, SVGA-1st OM, SVGA-RCA 2nd: rad-LAD, rad-LAD, SVGA-RCA | 100% | The concomitant radial graft to the LAD | angiogram |
5 | LIMA-LAD, SVGA-1st diag., SVGA-1st OM, SVGA-RCA | 31% (87% before the operation) | Regression of the LAD lesion | angiogram |
6 | LIMA-diag-LAD, rad-LCx, rad-RCA | 62% (83% before the operation) | Non-significant lesion on the diagonal branch | angiogram |