Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for the treatment of congenital heart defects: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Chao Ding
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Chao Ding
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Chao Ding
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raffaele Giordano
16 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Chao Ding
Resubmission - Version 7
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Chao Ding
Resubmission - Version 8
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
16 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
4 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1749-8090-7-43

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement