This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Simplicity, skills, and pitfalls of ascending aortic cannulation for type A aortic dissection
© Taguchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 March 2013
Accepted: 24 June 2013
Published: 26 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Tettey|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomoki Shimokawa|
|3 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Mangini|
|13 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Shinichi Taguchi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Shinichi Taguchi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1749-8090-8-161|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.