Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

  • Dong Zhou1,
  • Quan-Xing Liu1,
  • Xu-Feng Deng1,
  • Jia-Xin Min1 and
  • Ji-Gang Dai1Email author
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery201510:67

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0271-4

Received: 5 December 2014

Accepted: 1 May 2015

Published: 8 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Dec 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
1 May 2015 Editorially accepted
8 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s13019-015-0271-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University

Advertisement