Skip to main content

Table 2 Operative factors and findings (N = 70)a

From: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna mitral valve bioprosthesis: intermediate-term efficacy and durability

Operative factors

 

Indication

 

 MR

49 (70 %)

 MS

19 (27 %)

 Endocarditis

10 (14.2 %)

Attempted repair

 

 Yes

7 (10 %)

 No

63 (90 %)

Minimally invasive Magna valve implantation

 

 Yes

1 (1.4 %)

 No (i.e., full sternotomy)

69 (99 %)

Technique for Magna valve implantation

 

 Transseptal approach

49 (70 %)

 Left atriotomy

21 (30 %)

 Subvalvular leaflet preservation

56 (80 %)

Magna valve sizeb (mm)

28 ± 0.3

 25

18 (26 %)

 27

16 (23 %)

 29

19 (27 %)

 31

16 (23 %)

 33

1 (1.4 %)

Findings

 

 Rheumatic disease

12 (17 %)

 Myxomatous disease

4 (5.7 %)

 Ruptured chordae

5 (7.1 %)

 Degenerative disease

28 (40 %)

 Vegetations

10 (14 %)

 MAC

38 (54 %)

 Ischemic MR (posterior restriction)

3 (4.3 %)

Concomitant procedures

 

 Any

58 (83 %)

 CABG

6 (8.6 %)

 AVR, TVR, ASD repair, and/or myectomy

33 (47 %)

 CABG + AVR, TVR, ASD repair, and/or myectomy

11 (16 %)

 AVR

24 (34 %)

 Triple valve procedures

6 (8.6 %)

 Antiarrhythmic procedure (Cox maze procedure, PVI, and/or LAAL)

7 (10 %)

  1. mm millimeters, MR mitral regurgitation, MS mitral stenosis, MAC mitral annular calcification, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, AVR aortic valve replacement, TVR tricuspid valve repair, ASD atrial septal defect, PVI pulmonary vein isolation, LAAL left atrial appendage ligation
  2. aContinuous variables expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SE); categorical variables, as n (percentage)
  3. bData available for only 68 patients