Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gaetano Paone|
|23 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mario Gaudino|
|25 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Salah Altarabsheh|
|23 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Xiao-Wen Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|5 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13019-016-0512-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.