This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: the experience of a single center
- LiMin Xia†1,
- Qiang Ji†2,
- Kai Song2,
- JinQiang Shen2,
- YunQing Shi2,
- RunHua Ma2,
- WenJun Ding2 and
- ChunSheng Wang1Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 August 2016
Accepted: 25 January 2017
Published: 23 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mohamed Alattar|
|19 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charanjit Khurana|
|13 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Li Xia|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13019-017-0572-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.