Skip to content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of non-invasive to invasive oxygenation ratios for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective derivation-validation cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Jul 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Forrest
16 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yue Yun
2 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Farshid R. Bashar
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
27 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13019-018-0804-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.