Repair of partial atrioventricular canal defect in adult patients: two-year follow-up outcomes of a retrospective study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Feb 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Mc Connell|
|23 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - S Ram Kumar|
|3 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bugra Harmandar|
|6 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karolis Jonas|
|7 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nazmul Hosain|
|11 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Li Hongxin|
|17 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Lingyun Song|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jun 2019||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jun 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13019-019-0931-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.