Skeletonisation contributing to a reduction of sternal wound complications: a retrospective study in OPCAB patients
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Jul 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter Gomes|
|25 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toshihiro Fukui|
|25 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Fremes|
|27 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roman Gottardi|
|28 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jose Gonzalez Santos|
|16 Aug 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Jef Van den Eynde|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Aug 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Sep 2019||Editorially accepted|
|9 Sep 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13019-019-0985-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.