Skip to main content

Table 2 Traditional Y-Graft techniques vs Modified Y-Graft techniques utilizing Femoral artery bypass (FAB)

From: Short-term outcomes of modified Y-graft technique in acute type a aortic dissection using the femoral artery bypass and one minute systemic circulatory arrest technique

Variates

Traditional Y-Graft techniques

Modified Y-Graft techniques utilizing Femoral artery bypass (n = 23)

Operative variables

 Perfusion and ischemic times, minutes

  Cardiopulmonary bypass

141 (118–183) [1]

236 (200–290)

236.2 ± 52.5 [7]

 

239 ± 53.1 [8]

 

279 ± 82 [9]

 

273 ± 79 [10]

 

  Systemic circulatory arrest

65 (51–84) [1]

20.6 ± 6.9

31.2 ± 6.6 [7]

 

78 ± 34 [9]

 

69 ± 22 [10]

 

  Aortic clamp

53.9 ± 41.1 [1]

105 ± 25.7

144 ± 55 [9]

 

163 ± 54 [10]

 

  Cerebral circulatory arrest

0

0

 Lowest nasopharyngeal/rectal temperature, °C

22.0 °C (19.1–23.7) [1]

28 °C

12.8 ± 2.2 °C (9.9–19.8) [7]

 

15.8 ± 2.1 °C (12.0–22.1) [8]

 

24.0 ± 2.2 °C [9]

 

16–20 °C [11]

 

23 °C [10]

 

 Concomitant aortic valve replacement

40% [1]

(n = 8)34.8%

2.8% [7]

 

 Concomitant coronary artery bypass

9% [1]

(n = 3)13.0%

2.8% [7]

 

Outcomes

 Operative mortality

2% [1]

(n = 2)8.7%

4.6% [7]

 

4.7% [8]

 

4.9% [9]

 

6.8% [12]

 

2% [13]

 

6.8% [11]

 

6.8% [10]

 

 Neurologic dysfunction

5% [1]

(n = 3)13.0%

9.4% [8]

 

9.8% [9]

 

14% [14]

 

5% [13]

 

9.1% [11]

 

 Respiratory support

>2 days 20–51% [10]

>2 days (n = 15) 65.2%

>5 days 5–30% [10]

>5 days (n = 8)34.8%

 Acute renal failure

11% [1]

(n = 5)21.7%

3.7% [7]

 

6% [8]

 

13.1% [9]

 

5.4% [11]

 
  1. Data are reported as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or number (%). The superscript numbers are the sequence number of references