Skip to main content

Table 3 Population descriptors of eligible full-text articles

From: Clinical performance of decellularized heart valves versus standard tissue conduits: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

Total sample size

Standard tissue conduit sample size

Decellularized valve sample size

Sex (M;F)a

[Median age]; mean age ± SD (range), yearsa

[Median mass]; mean mass ± SD (range), kga

Bechtel et al. 2005 [39]

69

47

22

18;4

37.4 ± 10.2

 

Bechtel et al. 2008 [40]

72

49

23

19;4

37.0 ± 10.8

 

Bibevski et al. 2017 [41]

287

124

163

107;56

17.3 ± 16.4 (0.005–74)

45.8 ± 36.3 (2–126)

Boethig et al. 2019 [42]

705

470

235

136;99

19.1 ± 12.8

 

Brown et al. 2010 [43]

1588

1246

342

229;113

23.9 ± 12.6 (0–69.6)

 

Brown et al. 2011 [44]

63

34

29

 

[22]; 28.6 ± 16.0 (0.25–58)

[81]; 79.3 ± 28.4 (5–126)

Burch et al. 2010 [45]

94

47

47

 

[9.11]; 9.91 ± 8.08 (0.011–30.03)

[25]; 33 ± 26 (3–90)

Cebotari et al. 2011 [46]

114

76

38

16;22

16.4 ± 11.4

 

da Costa et al. 2005 [47]

20

9

11

5;6

23.0 ± 9.04 (9–37)

 

da Costa et al. 2007 [33]

136

68

68

48;20

30.3 ± 11.2 (9–56)

 

da Costa et al. 2018 [48]

188

94

94

74;20

[34.0]

 

Etnel et al. 2018 [49]

260

130

130

93;37

[28]

 

Konuma et al. 2009 [50]

82

41

41

 

5.5 ± 7.4

20.5 ± 22.0

Ruzmetov et al. 2012 [51]

100

61

39

25;14

19.2 ± 17.2 (0.02–72)

54.7 ± 40.4 (2.8–167)

Sarikouch et al. 2016 [34]

279

186

93

58;35

15.8 ± 10.2

 

Sievers et al. 2003 [52]

34

17

17

13;4

39.7 ± 9.7

 

Tavakkol et al. 2005 [53]

52

26

26

 

5.1 ± 5.4

20.5 ± 22.7

  1. Blank cells correspond with data points that were not reported in the respective article
  2. F female, kg kilogram, M male, SD standard deviation
  3. a These data relate to the decellularized heart valve patient population