Long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement in patients weighing less than 10 kg

Table 1 Patients list

NO.	Sex	Age	Weight	Diagnosis	Procedure	VALVE (SIZE)	Ratio	Redo	Clamping	Bypass	Ventilation time	ICU Stay	PG 1 week post	Death
1	F	9	9	MR, Post CAVSD Repair	SSMVR	19	2.11	N	173	285	66	3.3	8	N
2	M	3	5.5	MR, VSD	SMVR	19	3.45	Y	125	185	336	14		Y
3	F	3	4.7	MS, MR	SSMVR	19	4.0	N	104	121	124	10	12	N
4	F	1	3.8	Post MVP, MR	MVR	19	5	N	160	209	48	2		Y
5	F	12	7	IE, MR, Post PAVSD Repair	MVR	21	3	N	56	95	504	89		Y
6	F	21	9	MR, PDA	MVR	25	2.7	N	33	57	19	1.8	12	N
7	M	2	4	MS, MR	SSMVR	16	4	N	124	171	384	20	12	N
8	F	32	9.5	MR, Post PAVSD Repair	MVR	25	2.6	N	104	155	72	7	10	N
9	M	24	9	MR, CoA	MVR	25	2.7	N	56	111	120	8	9	N

Age (months), Clamping and Bypass (minute), Ventilation time (hour), ICU Stay (day), Weight (kg), Size (mm), PG (mmHg), F Female, M Male, N NO, Y Yes, Ratio Valve size/weight, Redo Reintervention after initial MVR, MR Mitral valve regurgition, MS Mitral valve stenosis, VSD Ventricular septal defect, PDA Patent duct arteriol, IE Infective endocardiatis, PAVSD Partial artroventricular septal defect, CAVSD Complete artroventricular septal defect, CoA Coarctation, MVP Mitral valve repairment, MVR Mitral valve replacement, SMVR Supra-annul mitral valve replacement, SSMVR Skirt supra-annul mitral valve replacement, PG Pressure gradient

ISSN: 1749-8090