Skip to main content

Table 2 Details of LNM and TNM stage

From: Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

 

0

(30, %)

I

(193, %)

II

(715, %)

III

(507, %)

IV (76, %)

Total

P value

LNM in thorax

      

<  0.001

 No

30 (100.0)

193 (100.0)

706 (98.7)

147 (29.0)

9 (11.8)

1085

 

 Yes

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

9 (1.3)

360 (71.0)

67 (88.2)

436

 

LNM in upper abdomen

      

<  0.001

 No

30 (100.0)

193 (100.0)

700 (97.9)

234 (46.2)

16 (21.1)

1173

 

 Yes

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

15 (2.1)

273 (53.8)

60 (78.9)

348

 

LNM cervical

      

<  0.001

 No

30 (100.0)

193 (100.0)

714 (99.9)

488 (96.3)

68 (89.5)

1456

 

 Yes

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.1)

19 (3.7)

8 (10.5)

23

 

Subcarinal LN metastasis

      

< 0.001

 No

30 (100.0)

193 (100.0)

714 (99.9)

429 (84.6)

43 (56.6)

1409

 

 Yes

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.1)

78 (15.4)

33 (43.4)

112

 

Recurrent laryngeal nerve LN metastasis

      

< 0.001

 No

25 (100.0)

171 (100.0)

708 (99.0)

417 (82.2)

56 (73.7)

1404

 

 Yes

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

7 (1.0)

90 (17.8)

20 (26.3)

117

 

Left gastric artery LN metastasis

      

< 0.001

 No

25 (100.0)

171 (100.0)

701 (98.0)

315 (62.1)

26 (34.2)

1265

 

 Yes

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

14 (2.0)

37.9 (41.1)

50 (65.8)

256

 
  1. Displayed the different pattern of LNM in different N stage, and the significance was conducted with Fisher’s exact test.