Skip to main content

Table 2 TTFM values of different bypass grafting technique in SVG

From: Transit time flow measurement predicts graft patency in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting upon 5-year angiographic follow-up

Variable Grafting technique MGF PI DF
DIAG Individual grafting 23.9 ± 15.4 (8, 70) 1.8 ± 0.7 (1, 3) 71.5 ± 8.4 (55, 87)
  Sequential grafting 31.8 ± 21.0 (5, 89) 2.5 ± 0.9 (1.6) 71.6 ± 10.1 (41, 97)
OM Individual grafting 28.8 ± 20.5 (6, 71) 2.8 ± 1.9 (1, 9) 66.1 ± 11.7 (47, 87)
  Sequential grafting 31.5 ± 21.4 (4, 125) 2.5 ± 1.2 (1, 11) 69.6 ± 9.9 (48, 92)
PDA Individual grafting 26.5 ± 17.7 (9, 74) 2.7 ± 1.3 (1, 7) 62.1 ± 12.2 (27, 76)
  Sequential grafting 27.4 ± 21.1 (3, 86) 2.6 ± 1.7 (1, 10) 65.1 ± 9.7 (43, 85)
PLA Individual grafting 26.3 ± 10.6 (10, 41) 2.2 ± 0.7 (1, 4) 70 ± 11.2 (58, 82)
  Sequential grafting 28.2 ± 15.8 (7, 73) 2.2 ± 1.2 (1, 6) 66.4 ± 12.5 (42, 98)
  1. DIAG, diagonal artery; OM, obtuse marginal branch of circumflex artery; PDA, posterior descending artery; PLA, left posterior artery; MGF, mean graft flow; PI, pulsatile index; DF, diastolic filtration