From: The diagnostic value of D-dimer in acute aortic dissection: a meta-analysis
First author | Year | Country | Case (control) | Detection method | Cut-off value | TP | FP | FN | TN | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eggebrecht [20] | 2004 | Germany | 16 (80) | Latex-enhanced turbidimetric test | 0.626 µg/mL | 16 | 0 | 58 | 22 | 100 | 73 |
Akutsu [21] | 2005 | Japan | 30 (48) | Latex agglutination test | 0.5 µg/mL | 30 | 0 | 26 | 22 | 100 | 54 |
Hazui [22] | 2005 | Japan | 29 (49) | Latex agglutination test | 0.8 or 0.9 μg/ml | 27 | 2 | 45 | 4 | 93.1 | 91.8 |
Ohlmann [23] | 2006 | France | 94 (94) | Immunoturbidimetric assay | 400Â ng/mL | 93 | 1 | 32 | 62 | 99 | 34 |
Sbarouni [24] | 2007 | Greece | 18 (29) | ELISA | 700Â ng/ml | 17 | 1 | 17 | 12 | 94 | 59 |
Xue [25] | 2007 | China | 16 (27) | Immunoturbidimetric assay | 0.4 µg/mL | 16 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 100 | 66 |
Suzuki [26] | 2009 | Japan | 87 (133) | Triage D-dimer test | 500Â ng/mL | 84 | 3 | 62 | 71 | 96.6 | 46.6 |
Fan QK [27] | 2010 | China | 107 (153) | Immunoturbidimetric assay | 0.17 µg/mL | 106 | 1 | 47 | 106 | 99.2 | 30.9 |
Sakamoto [28] | 2011 | Japan | 35 (228) | Latex-enhanced turbidimetric test | 5 µg/mL | 24 | 11 | 206 | 22 | 68.4 | 90.3 |
Nazerian [29] | 2014 | Italy | 233 (802) | Latex agglutination test | 500Â ng/ml | 229 | 4 | 288 | 514 | 98.3 | 35.9 |
Peng [30] | 2015 | China | 35 (51) | ELISA | 2.11 µg/mL | 28 | 7 | 46 | 5 | 80 | 90.21 |
Yoshimuta [31] | 2015 | Japan | 9 (1227) | Latex agglutination test | 6.9 μg/ml | 9 | 0 | 1163 | 64 | 100 | 94.8 |
Gorla [32] | 2015 | Germany | 159 (72) | Microparticle-enhanced immunoassay | 0.5Â mg/L | 157 | 2 | 48 | 24 | 99 | 67 |
Sakamoto [16] | 2016 | Japan | 5 (235) | NR | 5.0 μg/ml | 5 | 0 | 215 | 20 | 100 | 91.7 |
Xiao [17] | 2016 | China | 60 (60) | Automatic coagulation instrument | 1.435Â mg/L | 56 | 4 | 41 | 19 | 93.33 | 68.33 |
Dong [18] | 2017 | China | 202 (150) | Immune nephelometry | NR | 139 | 63 | 91 | 59 | 68.8 | 60.9 |