Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: The effect of diabetes on surgical versus percutaneous left main revascularization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Years

Number of DES/CABG patients

Number of DM/non-DM patients

Age* (years)

Follow-up (years)

ACS (%)

Coronary artery disease severity

Entry criteria

Stent type

Primary outcome

Adjusting method

Risk of bias

Randomized controlled trials

Morice et al.

2014

346/322

150/518

65.5 (9.9)

5 (mean)

29.8

Mean SYNTAX score (core-lab): 29.6 DES/30.2 CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis

Silent ischemia or stable/unstable angina

Paclitaxel

Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, MI, or repeat revascularization at 5-year follow-up

Randomization

Some concern

Milojevic et al.

2019

948/956

554/1350

65.9 (9.6)

3 (mean)

39.2

Mean SYNTAX score (core-lab): 26.9 DES/26 CABG

 ≥ 70% ULMCA visual stenosis, 50–70% stenosis if significant by invasive or non-invasive testing, SYNTAX ≤ 32

Silent ischemia, angina, or ACS

Everolimus

Composite of all-cause mortality, MI, or stroke at median 3-year follow-up

Randomization

Some concern

Holm et al.

2020

592/592

184/1000

66.4 (9.7)

4.9 (median)

17.4

Mean SYNTAX score (core-lab): 22.5 DES/22.4 CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis or FFR ≤ 0.8

Angina, ACS

 ≤ 3 additional non-complex lesions

Biolimus

Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, non-index treatment-related MI or unplanned revascularization at 5 years or until 275 events

Randomization

Some concern

Park et al.

2020

300/300

192/408

62.3 (9.8)

11.3 (median)

50.5

Mean SYNTAX score (core-lab): 22.4 DES/25.8 CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis

Silent ischemia, angina, NSTEACS

Sirolimus

Composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 10-year follow-up

Randomization

Some concern

Observational studies

Zhao et al.

2011

56/116

172/0

61 (N/A)

2.4 (median)

98.3

LMCAD + 3-vessel disease: 46.4% DES/73.3% CABG

ULMCAD (severity unspecified)

Medically treated DM patients

Sirolimus (94.6%),

Zotarolimus (5.4%)

All-cause mortality

Multivariable outcome regression

Serious

Meliga et al.

2013

520/306

826/0

66.9 (9.7)

4.0 (mean)

66.8

LMCAD + 3-vessel disease: 38.1% DES/72.9% CABG

ULMCAD (severity unspecified)

Medically treated DM patients

Sirolimus (57.9%),

Paclitaxel (40.0%),

Zotarolimus (0.2%),

Everolimus (1.9%)

Composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke

Propensity score with outcome regression

Moderate

Yu et al.

2015

465/457

274/648

62.8 (N/A)

7.1 (median)

81.0

LMCAD + 3-vessel disease: 35.3% DES/67.2% CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis

DES unspecified

Composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke

Multivariable outcome regression

Serious

Zheng et al.

2016

1442/2604

1154/2892

61.4 (98)

3 (mean)

52.3

LMCAD + 3-vessel disease: 34.5% DES/78.7% CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis

DES unspecified

All-cause mortality at 3-years

Propensity score with outcome regression

Moderate

Lee et al.

2017

950/950

736/1164

64.6 (9.8)

4.7 (median)

58.0

LMCAD + 3-vessel disease: 60.9% DES/61.4% CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis

DES unspecified

Composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke

PSM

Moderate

Lee et al.

2020

804/690

507/987

62.1 (10.6)

12 (median)

72.1

LMCAD + 3-vessel disease: 34.0% DES/94.1% CABG

 ≥ 50% ULMCA visual stenosis

DES unspecified

All-cause mortality

IPTW

Moderate

  1. ACS, Acute coronary syndrome; CABG, Coronary artery bypass surgery; DES, Drug-eluting stents; DM, Diabetes mellitus; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; NSTEACS, Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; PSM, propensity score matching; ULMCA, Unprotected left main coronary artery; ULMCAD, Unprotected left main coronary artery disease
  2. *Age converted from median into means using the method described by Wan et al. when appropriate [24]