Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included studies

From: Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials

Fist author (year)

Country

Sample size (n)

BMSC group (n)

CABG group (n)

Follow-up (months)

Age (years)

Sex, (male/female)

Type of stem cells

Dose of stem cells

Route of cell administration

Treatment of control group

Method for determining outcome measure

BMSC Group

CABG Group

BMSC Group

CABG Group

Patel et al. (2005)

Argentina

20

10

10

6

64.8 ± 3.9

63.6 ± 4.9

8/2

8/2

CD 34 + 

22.0 × 10^6(median)

IM

off-pump CABG-only

ECHO

Hendrikx et al. (2006)

Belgium

20

10

10

4

63.2 ± 8.5

66.8 ± 9.2

10/0

7/3

BMC

60.25 ± 31.35 × 10^6

IM

CABG-only

MRI

Stamm et al. (2007)

Germany

40

20

20

12

62 ± 10.2

63.5 ± 8.4

15/5

16/4

CD 133 + 

5.80 ± 10^6(median)(range 1.08 × 10^6 to 8.35 × 10^7)

IM

CABG-only

ECHO

Ang et al. (2008)

UK

62

21/21a

20

6

64.7 ± 8.7/62.1 ± 8.7

61.3 ± 8.3

15/6,19/2

18/2

BMC

84 ± 56 × 10^6/115 ± 73 × 10^6

IM/IC

CABG-only

MRI

Zhao et al. (2008)

China

36

18

18

6

60.3 ± 10.4

59.1 ± 15.7

15/3

15/3

BMMNC

6.59 ± 5.12 × 10^8

IM

CABG + placebo

ECHO

Hu et al. (2011)

China

60

31

29

6

56.61 ± 9.72

58.27 ± 8.86

NA

NA

BMMNC

13.17 ± 10.66 × 10^7

IC

CABG + placebo

MRI

Maureira et al. (2012)

France

14

7

7

6

58 ± 10

57 ± 10

7/0

6/1

BMMNC

NA

IM

CABG only

MRI

Lu et al. (2013)

China

50

25

25

12

58.0 ± 7.8

57.0 ± 8.3

22/3

24/1

BMMNC

13.38 ± 8.14 × 10^7

IC

CABG + placebo

MRI

Nasseri et al. (2014)

Germany

60

30

30

6

61.9 ± 7.3

62.7 ± 10.6

28/2

29/1

CD 133 + 

5.1 ± 1.017 × 10^6(median)(IQR 3.0 × 10^6 to 9.1 × 10^6)

IM

CABG + placebo

MRI

Pätilä et al. (2014)

Finland

39

20

19

12

65(57–73)(median)

64(58–70)(median)

19/1

18/1

BMMNC

8.4 × 10^8(median)(IQR 5.2 × 10^8 to 13.5 × 10^8)

IM

CABG + placebo

MRI

Trifunović et al. (2015)

Serbia

30

15

15

60(median)

53.8 ± 10.1

60 ± 6.8

14/1

14/1

BMMNC

70.7 ± 32.4 × 10^6

IM

CABG-only

ECHO

Wang et al. (2015)

China

90

45

45

6

61.4 ± 7.45

62.9 ± 6.93

37/8

35/10

BMC

5.21 ± 0.44 × 10^8

IM

CABG + placebo

ECHO

Noiseux et al. (2016)

Canada

33

19

14

6

66.4 ± 6.5

63.1 ± 7.2

17/2

13/1

CD 133 + 

6.5 ± 3.1 × 10^6

IM

CABG + placebo

MRI

Wang et al. (2016)

China

33

17

16

24

65.6 ± 3.97

65.5 ± 5.6

NA

NA

BMMNC

98.5 ± 48.3 × 10^6

IM

CABG-only

ECHO

Lu et al. (2017)

China

40

20

20

24

51.7 ± 2.5

52.6 ± 3.8

8/12

12/8

CD 34 + 

NA

IM

CABG-only

ECHO

Steinhoff et al. (2017)

Germany

58

28

30

6

64.0 ± 7.20

63.6 ± 7.75

26/2

26/4

CD 133 + 

2.29 ± 1.42 × 10^6

IM

CABG + placebo

MRI

Laguna et al. (2018)

Spain

17

8

9

9

62.63 ± 8.35

64.78 ± 11.48

7/1

8/1

BMMNC

NA

IM

CABG + placebo

ECHO

Naseri et al. (2018)

Iran

77

21/30b

26

18

53.14 ± 8.56/51.45 ± 7.49

55.50 ± 8.54

19/2,27/3

23/3

MNC/CD 133 + 

8.19 ± 4.26 × 10^6/564.63 ± 69.35 × 10^6

IM

CABG + placebo

SPECT

Qi et al. (2018)

China

42

24

18

12

57.88 ± 8.52

56.56 ± 9.09

23/1

17/1

BMMNC

13.28 ± 9.41 × 10^7

IC

CABG + placebo

MRI

Mann et al. (2019)

Netherlands

39

19

20

12

65 ± 7

65 ± 8

19/0

18/2

BMMNC

100 × 10^6

IM

CABG + placebo

SPECT

Soetisna et al. (2020)

Indonesia

26

13

13

6

54.61 ± 8.07

57.46 ± 6.33

12/1

12/1

CD133 + 

NA

IM

CABG-only

MRI

Ulus et al. (2020)

Turkey

28

12

16

12

56.9 ± 1.5(SE)

65.3 ± 1.7(SE)

12/0

16/0

BMMNC

70 × 10^7

IM

CABG-only

MRI

  1. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation
  2. aThree arms for the study: IM BMSC injection vs IC BMSC injection vs CABG alone
  3. bThree arms for the study: MNC injection vs CD 133 + injection vs CABG alone