From: Does the “obesity paradox” exist after transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95%CI | p | HR | 95%CI | p | |
BMI (categorical) | ||||||
Middle versus Low | 1.662 | 0.365–6.985 | 0.438 | 1.124 | 0.866–1.974 | 0.500 |
High versus Low | 0.887 | 0.368–0.935 | 0.029 | 1.231 | 0.920–1.995 | 0.738 |
BMIa (kg/m2) | 0.959 | 0.922–0.968 | 0.032 | |||
Age (years) | 3.119 | 1.192–5.106 | 0.043 | 1.168 | 0.993–1.867 | 0.323 |
Male | 1.032 | 0.988–1.996 | 0.788 | 0.855 | 0.733–1.457 | 0.534 |
Diabetes mellitus | 0.932 | 0.329–2.503 | 0.779 | 3.930 | 1.995–4.885 | 0.034 |
Chronic lung disease | 1.986 | 0.392–2.831 | 0.409 | 1.306 | 0.156–1.887 | 0.460 |
CAD | 1.988 | 0.959–2.887 | 0.569 | 1.004 | 0.566–1.661 | 0.660 |
Previous MI | 0.925 | 0.780–2.944 | 0.099 | |||
Previous CABG or valve surgery | 0.317 | 0.102–0.980 | 0.328 | |||
Previous stroke/TIA | 0.878 | 0.884–1.488 | 0.587 | |||
GFR (mL/min/m2) | 0.898 | 0.877–1.219 | < 0.001 | 3.006 | 1.876–3.301 | 0.046 |
Atrial fibrillation | 1.318 | 1.259–2.916 | 0.04 | 1.558 | 0.885–2.432 | 0.120 |
Frailty | 3.125 | 2.035–3.152 | < 0.001 | 3.825 | 1.968–4.730 | 0.003 |
Ejection fraction | 0.958 | 0.881–0.976 | 0.01 | 1.678 | 0.807–1.806 | 0.063 |
Aortic valve mean gradient (mm Hg) | 1.798 | 1.195–1.989 | 0.004 | 1.806 | 1.606–1.965 | 0.122 |
Aortic valve area (cm2) | 1.006 | 0.625–1.986 | 0.763 | |||
Valve type: VitaFlow®/J-Valve | 1.160 | 0.914–1.246 | 0.108 | 1.803 | 0.875–1.954 | 0.098 |
Alternative access: Transfemoral/Transapical | 2.940 | 1.338–2.957 | < 0.001 | 1.551 | 1.022–1.997 | 0.088 |