Skip to main content

Table 4 Hospital/provider characteristics of study groups after propensity score matching

From: Clinical and economic outcomes after sternotomy for cardiac surgery with skin closure through 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape versus absorbable sutures plus waterproof wound dressings: a retrospective cohort study

 

2OPMT group

CSWWD group

Std. Diff.*

N

5,338

100%

5,338

100%

 

Urban Hospital, N/%

5,174

96.90%

5,176

97.00%

0.002

Teaching Hospital, N/%

3,113

58.30%

3,148

59.00%

0.013

Hospital Bed Size, N/%

 0–299

727

13.60%

733

13.70%

−0.003

 300–499

1,562

29.30%

1,512

28.30%

0.021

 500+

3,049

57.10%

3,093

57.90%

−0.017

Geographic region, N/%

 Midwest

763

14.30%

827

15.50%

−0.034

 Northeast

708

13.30%

662

12.40%

0.026

 South

3,322

62.20%

3,336

62.50%

−0.005

 West

545

10.20%

513

9.60%

0.020

Provider annual volume, N/%

 0–200

1,502

28.10%

1,506

28.20%

−0.002

 201–350

974

18.20%

989

18.50%

−0.007

 351–500

992

18.60%

1,045

19.60%

−0.025

 500+

1,870

35.00%

1,798

33.70%

0.028

Procedural physician specialty, N/%

 Cardiovascular/thoracic surgery

5,121

95.90%

5,152

96.50%

−0.030

 Internal medicine

16

0.30%

13

0.20%

0.011

 Other

201

3.80%

173

3.20%

0.029

 Cost-to-charge ratio**, N/%

1,384

25.90%

1,353

25.30%

0.013

  1. SD standard deviation; Std. Diff. standardized mean difference
  2. *A standardized mean difference with an absolute value ≤ 0.10 is considered to balanced
  3. **Hospital costs are derived from a cost-to-charge ratio versus procedural costing