Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Abnormal origin of internal thoracic artery from the thyrocervical trunk: surgical considerations

  • George Paraskevas1Email author,
  • Konstantinos Natsis1,
  • Maria Tzika1,
  • Orestis Ioannidis1 and
  • Panagiotis Kitsoulis2
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery20127:63

DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-63

Received: 10 March 2012

Accepted: 29 June 2012

Published: 29 June 2012

Abstract

An unusual case of left internal thoracic artery (ITA) origin from the thyrocervical trunk (TCT) was detected during routine cadaver dissection. The variability of origin and course of ITA has less or more frequently been documented in the literature. However, the ITA origin from the TCT on the left side has been detected less commonly, making its dissection and preparation during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery more difficult. We discuss the ITA origin and course variability as well as clinical significance of the present variant, reviewing the relative literature. The objective of our study is to exhibit a rare ITA origin in order to provide a more accurate knowledge of such variations.

Keywords

Internal thoracic artery Internal mammary artery Thyrocervical trunk Anomalous origin Graft

Background

Internal thoracic artery (ITA) is a trait of important anatomical variability and clinical significance. It is widely utilized for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The ITA’s anatomic characteristics, such as distinct intrathoracic course and anatomical vicinity with the heart[1], its long-term patency[14], the long-term survival rate[2, 4] and post-operative quality of life[5] render it as an excellent arterial graft for myocardial revascularization.

Anomalous origin of the ITA has continually been reported in the literature. Unilateral[4, 6, 7] or bilateral[8] ITA origin from the lateral part of the subclavian artery (SCA) has been mentioned in less than 1 % of the studied cases[6], while the possible common origin of the ITA and branches of the thyrocervical trunk (TCT) is clinically underestimated in general. Does the ITA common origin from the TCT affect the implant’s suitability and survival? The variability in ITA origin gives birth to intense interest and extensive research in order to avoid surgical complications and clinical discomfort. We study the anatomic relationship of common ITA and TCT origin, as well as its possible consequences intra- and post-operatively.

Case report

An unusual case of common origin of ITA and TCT was encountered during routine gross anatomy dissection undertaken for education and research purposes in a formalin-fixed 79-year-old female cadaver. By means of typical methods of anatomic dissection and preparation, we dissected carefully the main branches of the aortic arch with their ramifications. Both SCAs were dissected preserving their branches and neighboring structures, while the ITA throughout its course was bilaterally exposed. Whereas on the right side ITA exhibited no variations, on the left side we came across an unusual origin of ITA from the TCT, the latter one being composed of a common trunk for the inferior thyroid and suprascapular artery, with the ascending cervical artery arising from the inferior thyroid artery. Left ITA after originating from TCT directed arcuately downwards passing anterior to SCA following afterwards its usual course and providing its normal branching pattern (Figure1). The cause of specimen’s death was unrelated to the present study. The documented vascular variation was not accompanied by other abnormalities of the neck and thorax regions. Furthermore, no evidence of previous surgical procedures, traumatic injuries or pathologic processes was present. The precise morphology and topography of the detected variational anatomy was documented by photographs.
Figure 1

Common origin of the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) and thyrocervical trunk (TCT). The ITA arises from the subclavian artery (SCA) as a common trunk with the inferior thyroid (IThA) and suprascapular (SSA) arteries. CCA: common carotid artery, ASM: anterior scalene muscle, L: left lung.

Discussion

Internal thoracic or mammary artery is the commonly used term for the vessel description, although sternal or parasternal[9] and Vineberg artery[10] constitute alternative denomination proposed in the literature. The artery was initially called “internal mammary artery” by Basle Nomina Anatomica in 1895[11], whilst later as official term was utilized the “internal thoracic artery” by Paris Nomina Anatomica in 1955[12]. ITA arises from the anteroinferior aspect of the SCA at about the similar level as the TCT. The artery passes inferomedially into the thorax with the cervical part providing no branches. It enters the thorax behind the cartilage of the first rib and usually behind the sixth cartilage it divides into its two terminal branches, the musculophrenic and the superior epigastric arteries. Inside the thorax, ITA provides mediastinal, sternal, pericardial, perforating and anterior intercostals branches[1315]. Although the termination level ranges between the third and seventh rib[3], ITA commonly terminates at the level of the sixth intercostal space, dividing into its terminal branches[1, 3, 16]. Henriquez-Pino et al.[16] encountered the presence of a third terminal, diaphragmatic ITA branch in 7 % of the cases, whereas trifurcation of the artery was also found in 12.5 %[17]- 61.3 %[18], including a xiphoid branch. There has also been reported a stepladder anastomosis pattern of a bifurcated right ITA[19].

Complicating the arterial anatomy, a lateral ITA branch called “lateral costal branch” or “accessory ITA” may also originate from the existing ITA[20, 21] and after an oblique course in the inner surface of the anterolateral thoracic wall anastomoses with the neighboring intercostal arteries. That accessory ITA may originate in an incidence of 4.54 %[21], 10.8 %[20] or 15 %[16]. The ITA’s parietal branches, thus the anterior intercostal, sternal, perforating and mediastinal arteries may arise separately or from a common trunk and the branching patterns have been classified into four types for the case of common trunk and four types for the separate branches[2]. The average artery length varies from 18.07 cm[18] to 20.4 cm[16]. A longer vessel course is detected in left sides and in male population[3, 16] presumably due to differences in thoracic dimensions. ITA lies in close proximity to the phrenic nerve risking partial iatrogenic paralysis of the diaphragm during ITA harvesting for CABG[1].

Nizanowski et al.[22] mentioned that in 11.4 % of the cases studied the ITA was found abnormal or absent, while cases of hypoplastic arteries have also been reported in the literature[23]. Anomalous unilateral[4, 6] or bilateral[8] ITA origin from the third portion of the SCA has also been encountered in the literature in less than 1 % of the cases, thus 0.78 %[24], 0.5 %[25], 0.83 %[6], increasing the vessel injury risk during percutaneous subsclavian catheterization[8]. The graft patency may also be reduced in case the ITA used for CABG surgery arises from the third SCA portion due to vessel traction[4].

It has been documented that in more than 79 % of the cases the ITA arises from the first part of the SCA[1, 16, 24]. It has been particularly indicated that in 2.6 %[24] or 16 %[16] the left ITA originated in common with the suprascapular artery, in 5 % in common with the suprascapular and transverse cervical arteries[16], in 0.5 % with the transverse cervical alone[24], also in 0.5 % with the inferior thyroid artery[24], in 4 % with the ascending cervical and inferior thyroid arteries[16], whereas only in 0.1 % the artery has a common origin with the transverse cervical and suprascapular arteries[24]. Furthermore, the left ITA had a common origin with the suprascapular and inferior thyroid arteries in 2 %[16], with the ascending cervical and suprascapular arteries in 1 %[16], in another 1 % left ITA co-originated with the ascending cervical artery[16] and in 1 %[16] or 7.4 %[24] the left ITA originated in common with the four TCT branches. Daseler et al. have noticed that the left ITA originated from the second portion of SCA, the axillary artery and the superior intercostal artery in 2.9 %, 0.3 % and 0.3 %, respectively[24]. Moreover, Henriquez-Pino et al. found that the right ITA originated as a single trunk from the SCA in 95 % of total cases[16]. Lischka et al. (1982)[26] mentioned that in a considerable incidence of 10 % the left ITA originated from the TCT, while the right ITA had the same origin only in 2 %. They also highlighted that in some cases ITA may give off branches usually classified as TCT branches. Puri et al.[1] reported that the right ITA arose in common with the TCT in 4 % and Wisniewski et al.[3] in 6.2. Uemura et al.[27] additionally noticed that the ITA originated from the TCT in 11.8 % of the 110 cases in which the SCA passed posteriorly to the anterior scalene muscle, as normal.

The ITA is found to be an artery with elastic properties[28, 29] that is resistant to atherosclerosis[30, 31], although cases of diseased arteries have been reported in the literature[32, 33]. This anatomically medium-sized artery receives sympathetic fibers in its adventitia[28] and has routinely been harvested as a suitable conduit for the myocardium ischaemia relief, showing an increased patency compared to the saphenous vein grafts[34]. During CABG surgery it is important to reassure the conduit length, course, and mobility within the surrounding structures in order to prevent traction and angulation[4].

The curved direction of the ITA-TCT common trunk makes the implant particularly vulnerable to traction and kinking, risking blood flow blockage and congestion. The usual CABG technique includes the free implant placing into an artificial tunnel in the myocardium[35]. Presumably, our curved ITA cannot be easily placed into the artificial tunnel, causing technical problems to the surgeon. The skeletonization technique, that has arisen debate in the literature[36, 37], could be proven suitable in our case as it involves the separation of the artery from any surrounding tissue[37], providing a longer conduit[38, 39] and possibly avoiding the intra-operative traction. Both pedicled and skeletonized left ITAs provide optimal patency[40], while the advantages of this new technique include decreased postoperative pain and dysesthesia[37].

Anatomic factors, such as the co-origin of other arteries together with the ITA that is utilized as a CABG graft, could be responsible for blood flow diversion and may lead to symptomatic coronary steal phenomenon (Figure2). The syndrome has been mentioned to originate from existent mammary side branches[41], proximal SCA stenosis[42] and ITA-TCT common trunk[43]. As a result, post-operative pain or even the need for re-operation may arise, as the implant may not be able to meet the myocardium oxygen demands[43]. The phenomenon co-exists with an unexpected blood flow inversion from the muscular regions that are normally supplied by the TCT branches. The number of the TCT branches originating in common with the ITA, may influence the patient’s symptomatology. An insufficient blood flow could ultimately lead to muscle palsy and joint movement limitations. It has been mentioned that in a patient underwent CABG intervention, the common origin of the ITA, inferior thyroid and suprascapular arteries, as it occurs in our case, is capable of causing pain and significant discomfort during shoulder movements. Manual exercise testing and angiographic results may prove the diagnosis postoperatively and vessels’ ligation could provide solution[43].
Figure 2

Schematic representation of the blood steal phenomenon. Both myocardium and shoulder area may present blood supply deficiency, as the internal thoracic artery (ITA) and the suprascapular artery arise from a common trunk and receive a limited amount of blood. CCA: Common Carotid Artery, SCA: Subclavian Artery, ASM: Anterior Scalene Muscle.

The anatomy, patency and ramification pattern of ITA can be visualized during routine pre-operative angiography, although its safety and necessity is debatable[4]. The risk of the procedure is not neglectable and some authors insist on its avoidance[43]. Based on our review of the literature and the frequency of the anatomical variation studied, we suggest preoperative selective angiographic evaluation involving the SCA-ITA junction, except from the cases in which serious contraindications are present. In cases where such an evaluation indicates the presence of common ITA-TCT trunk, another implant option or surgical approach could be preferred.

Conclusions

It is obvious that the presence of a common ITA-TCT trunk may complicate the surgical grafting procedure. The ITA is widely utilized as a great conduit for myocardial revascularization and its origin variability is of great surgical significance. The common origin of the left ITA and TCT branches could be undetected intra-operatively, although angiography could appear helpful. The awareness of such ITA’s anatomical variations, potentially causing surgical complications, is essential for thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons in order to avoid post-operative discomfort.

Abbreviations

ITA: 

Internal thoracic artery

TCT: 

Thyrocervical trunk

SCA: 

Subclavian artery

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Dr. Athanasios Raikos for his thoughtful comments and suggestions on the potential surgical significance of the presented variant.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anatomy, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
(2)
Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Ioannina

References

  1. Puri N, Gupta , Mahant TS, Puri D: Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting; anatomical variations to be considered. Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007, 23: 192-196. 10.1007/s12055-007-0036-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pietrasik K, Bakon L, Zdunek P, Wojda-Gradowska U, Dobosz P, Kolesnik A: Clinical anatomy of internal thoracic artery branches. Clin Anat. 1999, 12 (5): 307-314. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:5<307::AID-CA1>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wiśniewski M, Krakowiak-Sarnowska E, Szpinda M, Sarnowski J: The internal thoracic artery in human foetuses. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2004, 63 (1): 19-23.Google Scholar
  4. Yoshida K, Ohshima H, Murakami F, Tomida Y, Matsuura A, Hibi M, Kawamura M, Notoya A: Lateral origin of the right internal thoracic artery: report of a case. Surg Today. 1997, 27 (7): 664-665. 10.1007/BF02388227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC: Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986, 314 (1): 1-6. 10.1056/NEJM198601023140101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vorster W, du Plooy PT, Meiring JH: Abnormal origin of internal thoracic and vertebral arteries. Clin Anat. 1998, 11 (1): 33-37. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1998)11:1<33::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreou AY, Iakovou I, Vasiliadis I, Psathas C, Prokovas E, Pavlides G: Aberrant left internal thoracic artery origin from the extrascalenic part of the subclavian artery. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011, 16 (2): 62-64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Omar Y, Lachman N, Satyapal KS: Bilateral origin of the internal thoracic artery from the third part of the subclavian artery: A case report. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001, 23: 127-129. 10.1007/s00276-001-0127-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kakadellis J: A proper name for the internal mammary artery?. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996, 62 (6): 1889-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Salerno TA: A proper name for the internal mammary artery?. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997, 64 (4): 1218-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Basle Nomina Anatomica: Anatomische Nomenklatur. 1985, Verlag von Veit: Leipzig: von Wilhelm HisGoogle Scholar
  12. Paris Nomina Anatomica: Privately circulated, printed by Spottis-Woode. 1955, London: Ballatyne and CoGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosse C, Gaddum-Rose P: Hollinshead’s Textbook of Anatomy. 1997, Philadelphia: Lippincott- Raven, 432-5Google Scholar
  14. Williams P: Gray’s Anatomy. 1995, Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone, 1534-1535. 38Google Scholar
  15. Moore K, Dalley AF: Clinically oriented Anatomy. 1999, Lippincott: Williams and Wilkins, 1027-4Google Scholar
  16. Henriquez-Pino JA, Gomes WJ, Prates JC, Buffolo E: Surgical anatomy of the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997, 64: 1041-1045. 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00720-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Arnold M: The surgical anatomy of sternal blood supply. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1972, 64: 596-610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lachman N, Satyapal KS: Origin and incidence of xiphoid branch of the internal thoracic artery. Surg Radiol Ana. 1999, 21 (5): 351-354. 10.1007/BF01631338.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rao KPS, Dutta S, Narayana K: A rare variant of the internal thoracic (mammary) artery. Eur J Anat. 2004, 8 (1): 35-37.Google Scholar
  20. Nathan H, Rubinstein Z, Bogart B: Accessory internal thoracic artery. Anat Clin. 1982, 3: 333-337.Google Scholar
  21. Paraskevas G, Papaziogas B, Natsis K, Ioannidis O, Martoglou S, Economou D, Kitsoulis P: Accessory internal thoracic artery and its clinical significance. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2010, 105 (5): 709-711.Google Scholar
  22. Nizanowski C, Noczyński L, Suder E: Variability of the origin of ramifications of the subclavian artery in humans (studies on the Polish population). Folia Morphol (Warsz). 1982, 41 (3): 281-294.Google Scholar
  23. Sajja L, Mannam G: Rare variants of internal thoracic artery in patients with coronary artery disease. Ind J of Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009, 25 (2): 68-70. 10.1007/s12055-009-0035-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Daseler EH, Anson BJ: Surgical anatomy of the subclavian artery and its branches. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959, 108 (2): 149-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Krechowiecki A, Daniel B, Wiechowski S: Variation of the internal thoracic artery. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 1973, 32 (2): 173-184.Google Scholar
  26. Lischka MF, Krammer EB, Rath T, Riedl M, Ellböck E: The human thyrocervical trunk: configuration and variability reinvestigated. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1982, 163 (4): 389-401. 10.1007/BF00305554.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Uemura M, Takemura A, Ehara D, Yasumitsu H, Ohnishi Y, Suwa F: Comparative study of the ramification patterns of the subclavian branches as the subclavian artery passes in front or behind the scalenus anterior muscle. Anat Sci In. 2010, 85 (3): 160-166. 10.1007/s12565-010-0072-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddy S, Kumar P, Prasad K: Histomorphometric and sympathetic innervation of the human internal thoracic artery. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011, 66 (1): 131-136. 10.1590/S1807-59322011000100023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Barry MM, Foulon P, Touati G, Ledoux B, Sevestre H, Carmi D, Laude M: Comparative histological and biometric study of the coronary, radial and left internal thoracic arteries. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003, 25 (3–4): 284-289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heggtveit HA, Lobo FV: Atherosclerosis in internal mammary arteries selected for coronary artery bypass grafting. Can J Cardiol. 1992, 8 (1): 50-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Marx R, Clahsen H, Schneider R, Sons H, Klein RM, Gülker H: Histomorphological studies of the distal internal thoracic artery which support its use for coronary artery bypass grafting. Atherosclerosis. 2001, 159 (1): 43-48. 10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00483-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen RH, Reul GJ, Cooley DA: Severe internal mammary artery atherosclerosis after correction of coarctation of the aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995, 59 (5): 1228-1230. 10.1016/0003-4975(94)00967-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Darwazah AK, Shehadeh SM, Sharabati B, Abu Sham'a RA: Left internal mammary artery atherosclerosis: twenty-three years after repair of aortic coarctation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008, 86 (6): 1991-1994. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gansera B, Schmidtler F, Angelis I, Kiask T, Kemkes BM, Botzenhardt F: Patency of internal thoracic artery compared to vein grafts - postoperative angiographic findings in 1189 symptomatic patients in 12 years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007, 55 (7): 412-417. 10.1055/s-2007-965372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vineberg A, McMillan GC: The fate of the internal mammary artery implant in the ischaemic human heart. Dis Ches. 1958, 33 (1): 64-85. 10.1378/chest.33.1.64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Cunningham JM, Gharavi MA, Fardin R, Meek RA: Considerations in the skeletonization technique of internal thoracic artery dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992, 54 (5): 947-950. 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90656-O.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Boodhwani M, Lam BK, Nathan HJ, Mesana TG, Ruel M, Zeng W, Sellke FW, Rubens FD: Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison. Circulation. 2006, 114 (8): 766-773. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Keeley SB: The skeletonized internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987, 44 (3): 324-325. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62088-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nezic D, Knezevic A, Jovic M, Cirkovic M: Pericardial-strip technique to avoid traction on the pedicled left internal thoracic artery graft. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009, 36 (4): 364-365. author reply.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Ali E, Saso S, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T: Does a skeletonized or pedicled left internal thoracic artery give the best graft patency?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010, 10 (1): 97-104. 10.1510/icvts.2009.221242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaudino M, Serricchio M, Glieca F, Bruno P, Tondi P, Giordano A, Trani C, Calcagni ML, Pola P, Possati G: Steal phenomenon from mammary side branches: when does it occur?. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998, 66 (6): 2056-2062. 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00979-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Migliorato A, Andò G, Micari A, Baldari S, Arrigo F: Coronary-subclavian steal phenomenon late after coronary artery bypass grafting: an underappreciated cause of myocardial ischemia?. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009, 10 (7): 578-580. 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832c1f83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Tartini R, Steinbrunn W, Kappenberger L, Goebel N, Turina M: Anomalous origin of the left thyrocervical trunk as a cause of residual pain after myocardial revascularization with internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985, 40 (3): 302-304. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60048-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Paraskevas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement