Skip to main content

Decision making of iatrogenic coronary embolism after SAVR: a case report

Abstract

Background

Acute coronary artery obstruction is a rare but lethal complication of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), which may be caused by embolization of resected native tissue such as calcium plaque, thrombus, or perivalvular aortic tissue like fat embolus. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are the main treatment modalities. PCI is less invasive, but it is difficult to determine its feasibility intraoperatively.

Case presentation

We report an 86-year-old woman who had asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. She had scleroderma with an intractable left leg ulcer and bilateral leg varices. Considering the possibility of the spread of infection from the leg wound, SAVR was performed via right anterior thoracotomy to avoid complications such as mediastinitis. Coronary artery occlusion was suspected after weaning of cardiopulmonary bypass in the operation room due to asynergy with ST elevation and new severe mitral regurgitation. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) helped diagnose coronary obstruction by embolus based on the degree of stenosis and the movement of the stenosis site. Percutaneous catheter intervention was performed successfully to restore coronary perfusion.

Conclusion

TEE facilitated the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis caused by an embolus and helped in determining the feasibility of percutaneous catheter intervention, thus allowing us to choose PCI over CABG as a less invasive surgery. This is especially invaluable in cases where obtaining a saphenous graft for CABG is difficult or where CABG would have required conversion from minimally invasive surgery (anterolateral approach) to median sternotomy.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Acute coronary artery obstruction is a rare but lethal complication of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) [1] caused by embolization of the resected native tissue such as calcium plaque, thrombus, or the perivalvular aortic tissue (fat embolus). We report a case of acute coronary artery obstruction post-SAVR caused by an embolus that was quickly diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The use of TEE helped avoid coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in this patient who had an intractable left leg ulcer and bilateral varices. Although TEE could not visualize the embolus directly, we were able to detect anomalies and indirectly predict the properties of the embolus.

Case presentation

The patient was an 86-year-old woman with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). She had scleroderma with intractable left leg ulcers, bilateral leg varices, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. She had been followed up for 2 years by plastic surgeons. Due to delayed wound healing in the lower extremities, plastic surgery consulted cardiology, who diagnosed very severe aortic valve stenosis. On preoperative echocardiogram, aortic valve peak velocity was 5.5 m/s, and the mean pressure gradient was 76 mmHg; the aortic valve area was 0.54 cm2 in planimetry and 0. 86 cm2 in the continuity equation. Left ventricular internal end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters were 45 and 27 mm, respectively; ejection fraction was 71%. There was mild mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation. Although her mean gradient was 76 mmHg, it is possible that the condition of the patient with scleroderma, leg ulcers, and chronic advanced venous insufficiency had an impact on the patient actual capacity and that she was asymptomatic. Despite being asymptomatic, surgery was planned because of very severe AS. Considering the possibility of the spread of infection from the lower extremity wound (Fig. 1), SAVR was performed via right anterior thoracotomy to avoid wound infection and mediastinitis. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established with cannulation of the right femoral vein and artery (FA). Through the right third intercostal thoracotomy, left internal mammary artery and vein were ligated, and the fourth rib was dissected at the costochondral site. Aortotomy was attempted at 2 cm above the sinotubular junction. The aortic valve was tricuspid and showed calcific degeneration. Denaturation of noncoronary cusp (NCC) and right coronary cusp was particularly notable. The valve cusps were resected, the annulus calcification was removed, and the left ventricle was washed. A 19 mm bioprosthetic valve (INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve, Edwards Lifesciences, California, United States of America) was placed in the supraannular position. After confirming the patency of the coronary ostia, the aortotomy was closed. The heart was de-aired from the aortic vent, and the aorta was declamped.

The patient was placed off-pump uneventfully with dobutamine (2 µg/kg/min). TEE showed that the right and left coronary arteries were patent (Fig. 2). However, 20 min after being placed off-pump, her blood pressure decreased; TEE indicated poor contraction of the anterior and lateral wall and moderate mitral regurgitation (Fig. 3). Moreover, the coronary flow was decreased, and there was loss of coronary artery flow in left main trunk (LMT), #6, 11 (Fig. 4). TEE ruled out coronary or aortic dissection and postoperative ischemia caused by a malpositioned prosthetic valve occluding the coronary ostium. However, color Doppler showed mean flow velocity of over 20 cm/s in the left coronary artery. Based on focal dysfunction, coronary artery ischemia was suspected. We switched arterial cannulation from FA to ascending aorta, and the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was inserted from FA. Under 1:1 IABP support, blood pressure and TEE showed improved contraction as well as flow velocity in the left coronary artery. Her vital signs stabilized after infusion of dobutamine (10 µg/kg/min) and adrenaline (1 µg/kg/min).

Stenosis caused by an embolus was suspected because the stenosis had moved slightly and no dissectional flap was observed. In addition, because high-intensity lesions such as calcification were not observed on ultrasound, a thrombus or fat embolism was suspected.

These findings suggested that catheter intervention was feasible. As the patient had scleroderma with an intractable ulcer on the left lower leg, we opted for PCI instead of bypass surgery, as transfer of the patient to the catheterization room for coronary angiography (CAG) was deemed to be safe.

CAG showed obstruction at the entrance of the left circumflex artery, suggesting the presence of an embolus (Fig. 5.b). Intravascular ultrasound showed a low echoic embolus. Attempted aspiration with Thrombaster III (KANEKA MEDICAL, Tokyo, Japan) was unsuccessful. The embolic material was displaced by wire insertion to the distal lesion (#13) (Fig. 5.c), and a balloon expander (AsahiNC Kamui 2.5 × 12 mm, ASAHI INTECC, Aichi, Japan) was used to dilate the lesion to 20 atm for 30 s. However, no morphological change was observed in the stenotic lesion. A drug-eluting stent 3.5 × 15 mm (XienceSkypoint, Abbott, Chicago, Illinois) was placed at #13 (Fig. 5.d). On postoperative day (POD) 1, an echocardiogram showed trivial central aortic regurgitation, and left ventricular internal end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters were 43 and 32 mm, respectively; ejection fraction was reduced to 49% without asynergy. Her vitals were stable on POD2, and IABP was removed. Postoperative lymphorrhoea in the right inguinal region was treated with direct lymphostasis by suture ligation, and the patient was discharged on POD21. A 1-month follow-up echocardiogram indicated no decline in ejection fraction (48%) without asynergy and no signs of surgical site infection, and the condition of her leg ulcers improved slightly.

Discussion

The reported incidence of coronary ostial stenosis after SAVR ranges between 0.1% and 5% [1, 2]. Ischemic symptoms typically present within 3–6 months after SAVR. Funada et al. [3] and Somopopolou et al. [4] suggested that the most likely pathophysiological mechanism of coronary artery stenosis in the late stage of SAVR is posttraumatic fibrous intimal proliferation caused by coronary ostia cannulation for direct cardioplegia during the operation. Other potential technical problems [1, 5] that lead to the obstruction of a given coronary osmium include inaccurate size, improper positioning of the prosthesis, and suture line. There are only a few case reports concerning coronary stenosis as an acute complication after SAVR due to calcium-like material [2, 6], thrombus [7], or unknown emboli [8].

In such cases, abnormal wall motion was detected using TEE, and coronary problems were suspected and diagnosed via coronary angiography.

TEE can provide pivotal information during cardiac valve replacement surgery, including prosthetic valve motion, pathological leaks, findings related to other valvular diseases, closely evaluate the new relationship between the bilateral coronary ostium and new prosthetic valve [7], and aortic event such as aortic dissection [9] as well as to cardiac wall mortion.

The uniqueness of this case is that repeated TEE confirmed the moving stenosis site, which revealed that the cause was an embolus and that it was not a calcified lesion based on the echo brightness. Furthermore, by adjusting the Doppler sensitivity, it was possible to detect a slight flow, diagnosing a partial occlusion rather than a complete occlusion implying that the wire may be able to pass through. This suggested the possibility of suctioning out the embolus with a catheter, or even placing a stent. Because ECG can facilitate fast diagnosis of coronary problems, we were able to find the cause and consider the best surgical approach for this patient through patient observation with TEE.

CABG and PCI are the main treatment modalities for coronary obstruction by debris. The advantage of CABG is that it can be completed in the operating room where CPB can be used, thus improving safety. However, it is more invasive due to the need for graft harvesting, and CABG is not always safe. It can result in perioperative infarction, a high operative mortality rate, or a poor long-term outcome [10] PCI is a minimally invasive procedure that allows direct aspiration of the embolic material [11] or stent placement, precluding the need for grafting. In fact, several reports have shown good early and late outcomes with PCI and stent implantation [4, 12].

However, PCI entails a risk of sudden hemodynamic collapse due to the need to transfer the patient to the hybrid room or catheter room; moreover, there is a possibility of PCI failure due to the failure of passage of wire or stent expansion.

The most common cause of this after valve surgery is a simple air embolism, which should resolve with time and adequate circulatory support. If not, coronary occlusion is the cause, and to diagnose it properly, diagnostic coronary angiography is the gold standard. In this diagnosis and management process, TEE not only detected and diagnosed coronary occlusion but also suggested the feasibility of wire passage and stent expansion based on Doppler flow and echo intensity, thus allowing the choice of percutaneous coronary intervention and providing more information for treatment strategies as a next step.

In fact, information from TEE was particularly helpful in this patient as obtaining a saphenous graft would have been challenging due to lower extremity ulcers and bilateral varices; moreover, CABG would have necessitated conversion from anterior lateral approach to median sternotomy. Considering the possibility that emboli may move to the proximal site because of the turbulent flow due to the retrograde flow resulting from CABG, we decided that it would be better to press against the wall with a stent. Thus, repeated and continuous TEE conferred a distinct advantage in helping us avoid CABG and the benefit of PCI. There are some limitations. First, TEE cannot characterize the nature of embolus. Second, sudden hemodynamic changes may occur during transfer to the catheterization room or hybrid operation room. In case of unstable vitals, patient may be transferred with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [2]. Third, even though SAVR was selected because the annulus size was small (19 mm) and calcification was quite severe, transcatheter aortic valve intervention could have been an appropriate treatment option [13]. Fourth, we could not remove the embolus and leave a possibility of embolism to another location. Fifth, intermammary artery harvesting can be done through anterior thoracotomy [14]; however, we could not perform it technically. Sixth, the long-term outcome of PCI in this patient is yet to be determined. Although it is not possible to arrive at a conclusion based on the experience of just one case, I hope that by reporting this case, knowledge will be gathered at many facilities and that a new monitoring method will be developed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a, b, c. Intractable left leg ulcer and varices of bilateral legs

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transesophageal echocardiogram findings just after de-clump. More than 56.2 cm/s flow was detected in the left main trunk (LMT)

Fig. 3
figure 3

a, b. Mitral valve regargitation with central jet. (a) Preoperative and (b) intraoperative echocardiography

Fig. 4
figure 4

a, b, c, d. Transesophageal echocardiogram findings after asynergy. The left main trunk blood flow became undetectable in the range of 38.5 cm/s; 30-degree scanning angle. (a), but was picked up by reducing the blood flow range to 19.3 cm/s; 30-degree scanning angle. (b). Proximal left anterior descending artery (#6) flow was narrowly detectable; 30-degree scanning angle. (c), and no distal circumflex artery (#11) flow was observed; 120-degree scanning angle. (d)

Fig. 5
figure 5

a, b, c, d. Preoperative coronary angiogram (a). Intraoperative coronary angiogram showing 90% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery (b) and the nonenhanced circumflex artery (c). After successful passage of the wire and balloon expansion, the circumflex artery (LCx) was opened, and the stent was placed (d)

Data availability

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.

References

  1. Farid S, Page A, Howell N, Goddard M, Abu-Omar Y, Jenkins DP, et al. Coronary ostial compromise in aortic valve replacement:an avoidable complication. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015;23(5):535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ono N, Sawai T, Ishii H. Coronary ostial stenosis detected by transesophageal echocardiography after aortic valve replacement: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2017;3(1):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Funada A, Mizuno S, Ohsato K, Murakami T, Moriuchi I, Misawa K, et al. Three cases of iatrogenic coronary ostial stenosis after aortic valve replacement. Circ J. 2006;70(10):1312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomopoulou S, Sfirakis P, Spargias K. Angioplasty, stenting and thrombectomy to correct left main coronary stem obstruction by a bioprosthetic aortic valve. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008;20(4):E124–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Habibian M, Batra R, Mengel C, Sweeny A, Walters D. Cardiologists beware: an unusual cause of myocardial infarction after aortic valve replacement. Heart Lung Circ 2016;25.

  6. Sanchez-Recalde A, Gonzalez-Obeso E, Oliver JM. Bilateral coronary artery occlusion after aortic valve replacement in a patient with porcelain ascending aorta. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(13):1553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadek M, Tammim M, Abdelazeem Mahmoud M, et al. Coronary artery occlusion; the night mare post AVR. Am J Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;4(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang MS, Choi JH, Han JH, Choi YI, Kim JM, Youn HC. Acute coronary artery obstruction after aortic valve replacement surgery and role of transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;12(4):348–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Orihashi K, Takasaki T, Ozawa M, Sueda T. Intraoperative occlusion of left coronary ostium after aortic repair detected by transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):e205–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chavanon O, Carrier M, Cartier R, Hebert Y, Pellerin M, Perrault LP. Early reoperation for iatrogenic left main stenosis after aortic valve replacement: a perilous situation. Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;10(3):256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simek M, Sluka M, Gwozdziewicz M. Percutaneous aspiration of calcium debris resulting in coronary artery occlusion after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(4):793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziakas AG, Economou FI, Charokopos NA, et al. Coronary ostial stenosis after aortic valve replacement. Treatment of 2 patients with drug-eluting stents. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(4):465–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyasaka M, Tada N, Taguri M, Kato S, Enta Y, Otomo T, Hata M, Watanabe Y, Naganuma T, Araki M, Yamanaka F, Shirai S, Ueno H, Mizutani K, Tabata M, Higashimori A, Takagi K, Yamamoto M, Hayashida K. OCEAN-TAVI investigators. Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Asian patients: the OCEAN-TAVI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(8):771–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Masroor M, Zhou K, Chen C, et al. All we need to know about internal thoracic artery harvesting and preparation for myocardial revascularization: a systematic review. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank ENAGO for English language editing.

Funding

This study received no funding from private, public, or not-for-profit agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AT wrote manuscript preparation, critical review, and editing. KO, YM and RS reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuyuki Mitsuishi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Statement of informed consent

The authors confirm that informed consent for the publication of this case report was obtained from the patient.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitsuishi, A., Orihashi, K., Miura, Y. et al. Decision making of iatrogenic coronary embolism after SAVR: a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 128 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02613-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02613-1

Keywords