Peer Review reports
From: Five-year follow-up of angiographic disease progression after medicine, angioplasty, or surgery
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Farkouh |
| 22 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Chiquie Borges |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 27 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Farkouh |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1749-8090-5-91 |
You can find further information about peer review here.