Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Felipe Mendes |
3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guilherme Veiga Guimaraes |
7 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - MARCELO BERALDO |
9 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Alston |
16 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victor Issa |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
16 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Vitor Carvalho |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Vitor Carvalho |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Vitor Carvalho |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
25 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Vitor Carvalho |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
25 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
5 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Vitor Carvalho |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
12 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1749-8090-6-70 |
You can find further information about peer review here.