- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Epicardial pacing wires, a five year, single centre experience
© Abbas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Published: 11 September 2013
- Pace Lead
- Pace Threshold
- Congenital Cardiac Defect
- Pace Wire
- Valve Pathology
Indications for epicardial pacemaker insertion in the adult population include; complex congenital cardiac defects, difficult venous access, tricuspid valve pathology and in patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgical procedures. It still remains unclear as to the best type of lead used for this.
Between February 2008 and October 2012, 103 epicardial pacing wires were implanted in 70 adult patients. Of these leads, 46 were included in the study. Information regarding the perioperative period and follow-up was analysed to determine the patient’s clinical course and the durability of the pacing wires.
On implantation the mean threshold of all the leads was 1.1+/-0.8V at a mean pulse width of 0.5+/-0.7ms. The mean impedance of the leads was 673.4+/-268.1 OH. There was no difference in the implant data between unipolar and bipolar or steroid eluting and non-steroid eluting leads. There was a significantly lower pacing threshold in the steroid eluting leads at latest follow up (p=0.031). Similarly the pacing thresholds were lower in the bipolar leads when compared to the unipolar leads (p=0.026). There was no difference in impedance.
Overall the epicardial pacing leads demonstrate satisfactory pacing thresholds and impedance trends in the follow-up time of this study. Bipolar leads were more durable than unipolar leads and leads which eluted steroid were favourable than those which didn’t.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.