Skip to main content

Advertisement

Is cardiac surgery training really hazardous?

Article metrics

  • 466 Accesses

Background

Most of the times patients, and sometimes surgeons (even trainees) may feel that cardiac surgery training isn’t very safe, and may affect the outcome.

Methods

  1. 1

    year retrospective post-operative analysis of 520 patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery based on morbidity and mortality. The patients were divided into: patients operated by consultants (C), 444 patients and patients operated upon by registrars under supervision (F); 76 patients.

Results

Our results showed highly significant difference in the registrars group compared to consultants for cumulative cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic cross clamp time; p <0.01. While there was significant difference concerning post operative chest infection, p<0.05 in the registrars group. There was no statistically significant difference in logistic euro score, in-hospital mortality, incidence of post operative infection, post operative renal impairment, post operative arrhythmias, ICU readmission, post operative stay, reopening or the need for inotropes.

Conclusion

Cardiac surgery training isn’t really a compromise on outcome of patients undergoing CABG.

Author information

Correspondence to M El Saegh.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • Aortic Cross Clamp
  • Chest Infection
  • Cross Clamp Time
  • Post Operative Infection
  • Aortic Cross Clamp Time