Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Main characteristics of included studies

Study	Year	Numbers of patients (HCR/CABG)	Study design	CABG	HCR strategy	Follow-up (months)
Kon [17]	2007	15/30	Non-RCT	OPCABG	Simultaneous	12
Zhao [11]	2008	112/254	Non-RCT	On-pump	Simultaneous	NR
Reicher [14]	2007	13/26	Non-RCT	OPCABG	Simultaneous	14
Vassiliades [12]	2009	91/4175	Non-RCT	OPCABG	PCI then MICABG	12
					6.6%
					MICABG then PCI
					93.4%
Delhaye [20]	2010	18/18	Non-RCT	On-pump	CABG then PCI	12
Delhaye [20]	2010	18/18	Non-RCT	On-pump	OPCABG then PCI	12
Hu [18]	2010	104/104	Non-RCT	OPCABG	Simultaneous	18 ± 7.9
Halkos [19]	2011	147/588	Non-RCT	OPCABG	Mainly staged	38.4 (median)
Bachinsky [21]	2012	25/27	Non-RCT	OPCABG	Simultaneous	1
Leacche [16]	2012	80/301	Non-RCT	OPCABG	NR	1
Popov [15]	Unpublished	18/30	RCT	On-pump	MICABG then PCI	1

Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; OPCABG, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; MICABG, minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting; NR: not reported.

ISSN: 1749-8090