Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis

Original Submission
2 May 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Oct 2015 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2015 Article published 10.1186/s13019-015-0361-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

ISSN: 1749-8090

Contact us