Table 2 Techniques used
Technique | Group A(n = 33) | Group F(n = 29) | Total(n = 62) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total arch replacement | 31(93.94%) | 20(68.97%) | 51(82.26% | 0.010 |
Hemiarch repair | 0 | 6(20.69%) | 6(9.68%) | 0.008 |
Aortic debranching | 2(6.06%) | 1(3.45%) | 3(4.83%) | 1.000 |
Ascending aorta replacement | 33(100%) | 29(100%) | 62(100%) | – |
Elephant trunk | 33(100%) | 19(65.52%) | 52(83.87%) | 0.001 |
Aortic valve replacement | 15(45.45%) | 13(44.83%) | 28(45.16%) | 0.961 |
Aortic valve plastic | 15(45.45%) | 7(24.14%) | 22(35.48%) | 0.080 |
Coronary artery bypass | 2(6.06%) | 1(3.45%) | 3(4.83%) | 1.000 |
Mitral valve plastic | 3(9.09%) | 1(3.45%) | 4(6.45%) | 0.616 |
Tricuspid valve plastic | 2(6.06%) | 3(10.34%) | 5(8.06%) | 0.658 |
Repair of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm | 0 | 1(3.45%) | 1(1.61%) | 0.468 |
Left vertebral artery reconstruction | 0 | 1(3.45%) | 1(1.61%) | 0.468 |
Repair of auricular septal defect | 1(3.03%) | 0 | 1(1.61%) | 1.000 |