Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical Data of Simultaneous Double-Device Occlusion in 22 Patients

From: Device closure of diverse layout of multi-hole secundum atrial septal defect: different techniques and long-term follow-up

Patient number Age
(y)
Diameter of big CD (mm) Device size of big CD (mm) D value 1
(mm)
Diameter of small CD (mm) Device size of small CD (mm) D value 2
(mm)
Inter defects distance (mm) Order of device closure Types RS
1 5 18 24 6 8 12 4 16 SB LM N
2 39 15 22 7 13 20 7 12 SB LM N
3 2 7 8 1 4 6 2 8 SB Type C N
4 30 11 18 7 6 12 6 14 BS MM N
5 2 7 10 3 3 6 3 14 SB MS N
6 13 10 10 0 5 8 3 20 BS MM N
7 8 20 24 4 12 16 4 9 SB LM N
8 3 13 16 3 3 6 3 9 SB MS N
9 4 10 12 2 5 8 3 11 SB MS Y
10 3 6 8 2 3 4 1 12 SB MS N
11 10 14 18 4 7 10 3 19 SB MM N
12 8 23 26 3 3 6 3 9 SB LS Y
13 36 9 14 5 6 8 2 12 BS MM N
14 49 21 28 7 9 12 3 16 SB LM Y
15 10 16 20 4 4 6 2 11 SB LM N
16 10 19 22 3 4 6 2 7 SB LS N
17 34 18 22 4 8 12 4 10 SB LM N
18 13 23 26 3 13 16 3 3 SB LM N
19 58 16 18 2 7 12 5 3 SB LM Y
20 56 28 36 8 8 PF3030 19 BS LM N
21 48 19 26 7 12 PF2525 3 BS LM N
22 64 16 22 6 13 16 3 2 SB LM N
Mean ± SD 20 ± 19 15 ± 6 19 ± 7 4 ± 2 7 ± 3 10 ± 4 3 ± 1 11 ± 5
  1. CD central defect, D value Difference between device and defect size, SB small-hole device closure first then the big hole, BS big-hole device closure first then the small hole, RS Residual shunt at 3 months follow-up, LM Large-Moderate, MS Moderate-Small, MM Moderate-Moderate