Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical Data of Simultaneous Double-Device Occlusion in 22 Patients

From: Device closure of diverse layout of multi-hole secundum atrial septal defect: different techniques and long-term follow-up

Patient number

Age

(y)

Diameter of big CD (mm)

Device size of big CD (mm)

D value 1

(mm)

Diameter of small CD (mm)

Device size of small CD (mm)

D value 2

(mm)

Inter defects distance (mm)

Order of device closure

Types

RS

1

5

18

24

6

8

12

4

16

SB

LM

N

2

39

15

22

7

13

20

7

12

SB

LM

N

3

2

7

8

1

4

6

2

8

SB

Type C

N

4

30

11

18

7

6

12

6

14

BS

MM

N

5

2

7

10

3

3

6

3

14

SB

MS

N

6

13

10

10

0

5

8

3

20

BS

MM

N

7

8

20

24

4

12

16

4

9

SB

LM

N

8

3

13

16

3

3

6

3

9

SB

MS

N

9

4

10

12

2

5

8

3

11

SB

MS

Y

10

3

6

8

2

3

4

1

12

SB

MS

N

11

10

14

18

4

7

10

3

19

SB

MM

N

12

8

23

26

3

3

6

3

9

SB

LS

Y

13

36

9

14

5

6

8

2

12

BS

MM

N

14

49

21

28

7

9

12

3

16

SB

LM

Y

15

10

16

20

4

4

6

2

11

SB

LM

N

16

10

19

22

3

4

6

2

7

SB

LS

N

17

34

18

22

4

8

12

4

10

SB

LM

N

18

13

23

26

3

13

16

3

3

SB

LM

N

19

58

16

18

2

7

12

5

3

SB

LM

Y

20

56

28

36

8

8

PF3030

19

BS

LM

N

21

48

19

26

7

12

PF2525

3

BS

LM

N

22

64

16

22

6

13

16

3

2

SB

LM

N

Mean ± SD

20 ± 19

15 ± 6

19 ± 7

4 ± 2

7 ± 3

10 ± 4

3 ± 1

11 ± 5

  1. CD central defect, D value Difference between device and defect size, SB small-hole device closure first then the big hole, BS big-hole device closure first then the small hole, RS Residual shunt at 3 months follow-up, LM Large-Moderate, MS Moderate-Small, MM Moderate-Moderate