Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of TAVR Approaches on Procedural and Clinical Efficiency

From: Safety and efficacy of transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a current-generation balloon-expandable valve

Variables

TF (n = 100)

TAx (n = 24)

TT (n = 20)

p value

TF vs. TAx

TAx vs. TT

TF vs. TT

Fluoroscopy time, min

21.0 ± 5.4

23.9 ± 9.3

12.4 ± 5.0

< 0.001

0.105

< 0.001

< 0.001

Contrast amount, mL

162.6 ± 62.5

155.4 ± 44.9

126.0 ± 45.4

0.039

0.850

0.217

0.029

Procedural time, min

112.0 ± 28.3

185.3 ± 36.9

156.5 ± 35.6

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.047

0.004

Post-procedural LOS, d

3 (2–4)

4 (3–6)

6 (4–7)

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.132

< 0.001

  1. Values are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range)
  2. LOS length of stay, TAx transaxillary, TF transfemoral, TT transthoracic