Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Included Studies

From: The prognostic significance of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia in cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Study ID

Study Design

Sample Size (N) Case mix

PH incidence % (n)

% Male and age (mean (SD))

Bilirubin threshold (mg/dL)

Minimum monitoring period (days)

Number of units of blood transfused in PH group (mean (SD))

Number of units of blood transfused in non-PH group (mean (SD))

CPB Time (mins)

Cross Clamp time (mins)

Outcomes reported

Collins [24]

Prospective (single centre)

N = 248

20% (50)

NR

3

7

10.1 (7.5)

5.3 (3.5)

91.96

NR

In-hospital mortality

7% TV

60% MV

39% AV

38% CABG

Wang [33]

Prospective (single centre)

N = 302

35% (106)

57% Male

3

7

NR

NR

121.2

70.3

In-hospital mortality

30% CABG

51.87 (0.8)

ICU LOS

32% Valve

24% Redo

6% CHD

7% Complex

Chandra [34]

Prospective (single centre)

N = 77

26% (20)

70% Male

2

7

NR

NR

93.5

46.3

In-hospital mortality

26% CABG

32.1% (16.4)

ICU LOS

38% first time valve

Hospital LOS

4% valve reoperation

27% congenital repair

50% reconstructive procedure

Hosotsubo [27]

Retrospective (single centre)

N = 133

51% (68)

59% Male

2

14

6.85 (0.88)

4.0 (0.52)

NR

NR

In-hospital mortality

38% CABG

60 (1.3)

ICU LOS

48% valvular

14% Aneurysm

An [23]

Prospective

N = 386

25% (96)

47% Male

3

7

3.56 (0.02)

2.15 (0.03)

116.8

70.6

In-hospital mortality

(single centre)

57% valve cases

46.3 (1.14)

ICU LOS

36% CHD cases

Ventilation Time

4% combined cases

0% CABG

Leacche [29]

Retrospective (single centre)

N = 136

NR

37% Male

2

5

NR

NR

154

99

In-hospital mortality

40% CABG/valve

67(12)

29% CABG only

15% valve only

9% transplant

Kraev [28]

Retrospective (single centre)

N = 826

9% (74)

71% Male

2.8

7

8.0 (10.0)

2.49 (2.77)

143

106

In-hospital mortality

62% CABG

65 (13)

Hospital LOS

6% Valve

Long-term Mortality

32% other

 

Vidal [32]

Prospective

N = 73

23% (16)

68% Male

3

NR

NR

NR

106

65

In-hospital mortality

(single centre)

23% valve replacement

71 (11)

22% CABG

52% Combined

3% Other

Nishi [30]

Prospective

N = 334

19% (63.46)

60% Male

3

7

NR

NR

183

NR

In-hospital mortality

(single centre)

49% aortic valve

64.3 (14.9)

51% mitral valve

22% tricuspid

0% CABG

Sharma [31]

Prospective

N = 476

25% (119)

NR

2

7

3.95 (0.68)

2.29 (0.67)

103.77

74.06

In-hospital mortality

(single centre)

42% CABG

ICU LOS

34% valve repair

Hospital LOS

17% congenital

Ventilation Time

6% Valve + CABG

Diab [25]

Retrospective

N = 285

25% (71)

71% Male

3

2

NR

NR

135

NR

In-hospital mortality

(single centre)

44% single aortic valve IE

62 (14.1)

Long-term mortality

28% single mitral valve IE

27% both valves

21% prosthetic valve IE

0% CABG

Golitaleb [26]

Prospective (single centre)

N = 600

25% (150)

55% Male

3

7

NR

NR

105

81.67

In-hospital mortality

33% CABG

63.8 (8.94)

ICU LOS

33% AVR + CABG

Hospital LOS

33% MVR + CABG

  1. AV aortic valve, AVR aortic valve replacement, CABG coronary artery bypass grafts, CHD congenital heart disease, IE infective endocarditis, MV mitral valve, MVR mitral valve replacement, NR Not reported, TV tricuspid