From: Quality of life following surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review
Study | HR-QOL measurement | Patient Cohort | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Adam et al. [13] | SF12 | Age by decade | PCS scores were significantly lower than the norm in the > 70 cohort. PCS scores decline with increasing age |
 |  |  | MCS scores were not significantly lower in the > 70 cohort compared to a normative sample |
Endlich et al. [14] | SF36 | Age by decade | PCS scores were significantly lower than the norm for > 70 cohort (36 vs 41.8 P = 0.015) |
 |  |  | MCS scores were significantly lower than the norm for > 70 (38.9 vs 52.1, P = 0.001) |
 |  |  | The younger the patient, the lower the MCS score |
Bojko et al. [15] | SF36 | Octogenarians vs septuagenarians | There were no significant differences in the distribution of responses between octogenarians and septuagenarians for any of the 36 questions |
Santini et al. [18] | SF 36 | Patients > 75Y | There were no significant differences between the SF36 domains between the study group and the general Italian population > 75 years |
Jussli-Melchers et al. [19] | EQ5D | Patients > 70Y vs patients < 70Y | There were no significant differences between the younger and older groups across all domains |
Tang et al. [20] | SF36 | Patients > 80Y vs patients < 80Y | Physical functioning was significantly worse in the older group (43 vs 62, P < 0.05), whereas role limitations due to emotional health were less frequent in the older group (87 vs 66 P < 0.05) |
 |  |  | Other parameters were similar between groups |
Van Huyse et al. [24] | WHO performance scale | Patients > 80 | Six patients were able to return home postoperatively (40%). Every patient had a decrease in performance status level postoperatively |
Tashima et al. [29] | Barthel index | Patients > 70Y vs patients < 70Y | There was a significant difference in the Barthel index at discharge between the over 70/under 70 cohorts (84.7 vs 74.5 respectively) |