Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of risk scores, surgical techniques performed and follow-up in patient populations

From: Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies

Author

Risk score

MV Repair (%)

MV replacement (%)

Associated TV repair (%)

Associated AF surgery (%)

Follow-up (years)

Grossi et al. [10]

NI

100

0

NI

NI

NI

Nasso et al. [11]

NI

100

0

NI

NI

3.2 ± 1.4

Nishi et al. [12]

NI

100

0

NI

NI

NI

Downs et al. [13]

1.75 ± 3.9a

77.9

22.1

NI

27.3

NI

Hawkins et al. [14]

NI

73.3

26.7

9.4

37.8

NI

Wang Q et al. [15]

3.17 ± 1.2b

100

0

70.1

23.9

2.8*

Grant et al. [16]

5.4 ± 5.7c

84.1

15.9

8.05

17.1

3.7*

Liu et al. [17]

1.34 ± 0.67d

0

100

93.8

NI

2.2 ± 1.1

Paparella et al. [18]

2.6 ± 2.96d

65.2

34.8

13.7

NI

NI

Cetinkaya et al. [19]

7.6 ± 10.3c

86.75

13.25

16.65

26.4

3

Pojar et al. [20]

2.78 ± 2.4d

83.8

16.2

49.3

46.7

3.6 ± 2.1

Olsthoorn et al. [21]

3b*

78.6

21.4

10.7

14.1

3.2 ± 2

Mihaljevic et al. [22]

NI

100

0

NI

NI

NI

Suri et al. [23]

NI

100

0

NI

NI

NI

Iyigun et al. [24]

NI

32.2

64.8

12.9

NI

NI

Hawkins et al. [25]

0.6a*

82.9

17.1

NI

NI

NI

Wang A et al. [26]

2 ± 2a

94.4

5.6

NI

NI

1.8 ± 1.2

Coyan et al. [27]

0.8a*

83.5

16.5

NI

NI

NI

  1. MV Mitral valve, TV Tricuspid valve, AF Atrial fibrillation, NI Not indicated
  2. *Median
  3. aSTS PROM score
  4. bEuroscore
  5. clogistic Euroscore
  6. dEuroscore 2