Skip to main content

Table 2 Aortic, Mitral/tricuspid, and MEMO 4D substudy endpoints

From: The MANTRA study: a new umbrella concept prospectively applied to assess implantable medical devices for heart valve procedures

 

Aortic substudy (n = 1650)

Mitral/tricuspid substudy (n = 300)

MEMO 4D substudy (n = 200)

Primary endpoint

Device success at 30 days (+ 14 days) adapted from VARC-3 guidelines:

  Technical success

  Freedom from mortality

  Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication

  Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient < 20 mmHg and less than moderate aortic regurgitation)

Device success at 30 days (+ 14 days), adapted from MVARC guidelines:

  Procedural mortality or stroke; AND

  Proper placement and positioning of the device; AND

  Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure; AND

  Continued intended safety and performance of the device

Device success at 30 days (+ 14 days), adapted from MVARC guidelines:

  Procedural mortality or stroke; AND

  Proper placement and positioning of the device; AND

  Freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure; AND

  Continued intended safety and performance of the device

Secondary endpoints

  Safety and performance assessments at 30 days, 12 months, and annually after implant

  Collection of procedural and hospitalization information

  Patient outcomes

  Safety and performance assessments at 30 days, 12 months, and annually after implant

  Collection of procedural and hospitalization information

  Patient outcomes

  Safety and performance assessments at 30 days, 12 months, and annually after implant

  Collection of procedural and hospitalization information

  Patient outcomes