- Letters to the Editor
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Fixation artefact in an intra-operative frozen section: a potential cause of misinterpretation
© Thomson and Wallace; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 22 August 2007
- Accepted: 25 October 2007
- Published: 25 October 2007
The intra-operative histological assessment of fresh tissue can provide valuable diagnostic information and guide surgical management, however, even a limited exposure to standard fixation agents can potentially compromise analysis. Defined handling strategies should exist to facilitate the receipt of all specimens, in their optimal state, by the laboratory.
- Fresh Tissue
- Original Specimen
- Pleomorphic Nucleus
- Prominent Nucleolus
- Fixation Artefact
Sir: The intra-operative histological assessment of fresh tissue can provide valuable diagnostic information and guide surgical management [1–4]. However, the production of stained sections from frozen tissue is a technically demanding procedure which is associated with a variety of artefacts that limit interpretation and restrict subsequent clinical impact . As the following example illustrates, it is important that the tissue received by the laboratory is fresh and has not been inadvertently exposed to standard fixation agents prior to analysis.
We received a small biopsy, from an incidental lung lesion found in an 81-year-old male undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, with a request to perform an intra-operative frozen-section. The tissue had been placed in a standard specimen container to facilitate transport; as a consequence, upon arrival, it had been exposed to formalin-buffered saline for approximately 5–10 minutes. Following consultation with the surgical team, and in light of the limited period of exposure to fixative, it was decided to proceed with analysis.
This case illustrates that even transient tissue fixation can potentially compromise frozen-section analysis. Defined handling strategies should exist to facilitate the receipt of all specimens, in their optimal state, by the laboratory; when these protocols are not followed, extreme care should be taken in interpreting the histology.
- Shayan K, Langer JC, Smith C: Reliability of intraoperative frozen sections in the management of Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2004, 39: 1345-1348. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.05.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westra WH, Pritchett DD, Udelsman R: Intraoperative confirmation of parathyroid tissue during parathyroid exploration: a retrospective evaluation of the frozen section. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998, 22: 538-544. 10.1097/00000478-199805000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reyes MG, Homsi MF, McDonald LW, Glick RP: Imprints, smears, and frozen sections of brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 1991, 29: 575-579. 10.1097/00006123-199110000-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sienk A, Allen TC, Zander DS, Cagle PT: Frozen section of lung specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005, 129: 1602-1609.Google Scholar
- Desciak EB, Maloney ME: Artifacts in Frozen Section Preparation. Dermatol Surg. 2000, 26: 500-504. 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99246.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.