This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Combined ablation of atrial fibrillation and minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a case report
© Izutani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 28 July 2010
Accepted: 11 October 2010
Published: 11 October 2010
A partial lower inverted J sternotomy and an extended transseptal incision provide excellent exposure for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. However, the extended trasnsseptal incision causes dividing the sinus node artery, which may result in conduction system disturbance and need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Therefore, there is a challenge in the patient who requires concomitant ablation for atrial fibrillation because of possible conduction system disturbance caused by extended transseptal incision. We describe a new strategy for combined ablation of atrial fibrillation with minimally invasive cardiac surgery by a transseptal approach to the mitral valve through a partial lower sternotomy incision. Cryoablation was performed using a T-shaped cryoprobe with a lesion set of pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of the left and right isthmus in performing mitral annuloplasty, tricuspid annuloplasty, and atrial septal defect closure through a limited sternotomy incision. This technique might minimize possible conduction system disturbance and provide good surgical result for the patients who undergo mitral valve surgery and ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery with partial sternotomy for valvular heart disease has been performed for more than a decade. A partial lower sternotomy and an extended transseptal incision provide excellent exposure for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery [1, 2]. We have experienced sixty minimally invasive surgeries with partial sternotomy since 2004. This approach provides excellent results in less pain, less blood loss, lower rate of wound complications, shorter length of hospital stay, and excellent cosmetics. However, there is a challenge in the patient who requires combined ablation of atrial fibrillation because of possible conduction system disturbance caused by the extended transseptal approach. We carried out cryoablation in three patients for chronic atrial fibrillation with good clinical results using a T-shaped cryoprobe with a lesion set of pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of the left and right isthmus in performing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. We describe our technique for a creation of a lesion set for ablation of atrial fibrillation using the transseptal approach to the mitral valve through a partial lower sternotomy incision.
Several studies suggest that the extended transseptal approach carries an increased risk of early postoperative arrhythmias compared with the standard left atrial incision. The extended trasnseptal incision causes dividing the sinus node artery, which may result in conduction system disturbance and need for permanent pacemaker implantation . Kumar and colleagues reported early postoperative prevalence of junctional rhythm in 38% of the patients who underwent the transseptal approach, with resolution of sinus rhythm in a certain proportion of patients . Lukac and colleagues demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of permanent pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome between patients undergoing the transseptal approach and left atriotomy through the interatrial groove (6% versus 2.3%, respectively) . On the other hand, Légaré and colleagues showed that there was no difference in the prevalence of postoperative arrhythmias and permanent pacemaker insertion among the approaches through left atrial dome, interatrial groove, and atrial septum in 131 patients . We performed minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using the transseptal approach in 35 patients with preoperative sinus rhythm. Six patients developed junctional rhythm with or without bradycardia postoperatively, but there was no patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. The distribution of the sinus node artery was checked preoperatively by coronary angiography. We carefully extend the incision toward the dome of the left atrium to avoid injury of the sinus node artery in performing transseptal approach.
Gillinov and colleagues described a new technique for creation of a lesion set for atrial fibrillation ablation using the transseptal approach to the mitral valve through the minimally invasive partial sternotomy . They successfully did ablation using a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermy. We made a lesion set of ablation of atrial fibrillation which was different from that of Gillinov's technique. Our technique consists of a combination of pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of the left and right atrial isthmus using cryothermy. It is based on a technique described by Sueda and colleagues . They reported mid-term results of pulmonary vein isolation for the elimination of chronic atrial fibrillation. They showed excellent early results with the cumulative elimination rate of 70.2%. They commented that a requirement for a permanent pacemaker implantation was less frequent than that of standard MAZE procedure. They concluded that pulmonary vein isolation was effective and safe for surgical treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation.
Our technique of a minimally invasive approach with a 7-cm skin incision and partial lower sternotomy can be used to perform mitral valve, tricuspid valve procedure, atrial septal defect closure, and atrial fibrillation ablation. Three patients underwent ablation of atrial fibrillation in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with favorable results. Preoperatively, the present patient had chronic atrial fibrillation, and the other two had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and mitral regurgitation without atrial septal defect. They maintained sinus rhythm at least six months postoperatively. However continued careful follow-up should be mandatory for confirming the usefulness of this technique.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Krishnaswamy G, Jin U, Gillinov AM, Griffin B, Navia JL, Mihaljevic T, Lytle BW: Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010, 139: 926-32. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson LG: Minimally invasive surgery with a partial sternotomy "J" approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007, 19: 299-303. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2007.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berdajs D, Patonay L, Turina MI: The clinical anatomy of the sinus node artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003, 76: 732-5. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00660-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar N, Saad E, Prabhakar G, De Vol E, Duran CM: Extended transseptal versus conventional left atriotomy: early postoperative study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995, 60: 426-30. 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00449-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lukac P, Hjortdal VE, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Jensen HK, Hansen PS: Superior transseptal approach to mitral valve is associated with a higher need for pacemaker implantation than the left atrial approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007, 83: 77-82. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Légaré JF, Buth KJ, Arora RC, Murphy DA, Sullivan JA, Hirsch GM: The dome of the left atrium: an alternative approach for mitral valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003, 23: 272-6. 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00751-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillinov AM, Svensson LG: Ablation of atrial fibrillation with minimally invasive mitral surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007, 84: 1041-2. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sueda T, Imai K, Orihashi K, Okada K, Ban K, Hamamoto M: Midterm results of pulmonary vein isolation for the elimination of chronic atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 79: 521-5. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.