- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Evaluation of endoscopic vein extraction on structural and functional viability of saphenous vein endothelium
© Hussaini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 29 March 2011
- Accepted: 10 June 2011
- Published: 10 June 2011
Endothelial injury during harvest influences graft patency post CABG. We have previously shown that endoscopic harvest causes structural and functional damage to the saphenous vein (SV) endothelium. However, causes of such injury may depend on the extraction technique. In order to assess this supposition, we evaluated the effect of VirtuoSaph endoscopic SV harvesting technique (VsEVH) on structural and functional viability of SV endothelium using multiphoton imaging, biochemical and immunofluorescence assays.
Nineteen patients scheduled for CABG were prospectively identified. Each underwent VsEVH for one portion and "No-touch" open SV harvesting (OSVH) for another portion of the SV. A two cm segment from each portion was immersed in GALA conduit preservation solution and transported overnight to our lab for processing. The segments were labeled with fluorescent markers to quantify cell viability, calcium mobilization and generation of nitric oxide. Morphology, expression, localization and stability of endothelial caveolin, eNOS, von Willebrand factor and cadherin were evaluated using immunofluorescence, Western blot and multiphoton microscopy (MPM).
Morphological, biochemical and immunofluorescence parameters of viability, structure and function were well preserved in VsEVH group as in OSVH group. However, tonic eNOS activity, agonist-dependent calcium mobilization and nitric oxide production were partially attenuated in the VsEVH group.
This study indicates that VirtuoSaph endoscopic SV harvesting technique preserves the structural and functional viability of SV endothelium, but may differentially attenuate the vasomotor function of the saphenous vein graft.
Endoscopic extraction preserved the structure and function, but attenuated the calcium mobilization and nitric oxide generation in human SV endothelium.
- CABG venous grafts
- Endoscopic procedures
- Nitric Oxide
- Vascular reactivity
The Saphenous Vein (SV) is the most commonly used autologous homograft in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Preserving viable endothelium of SV grafts harvested during coronary revascularization impacts the grafts patency rate [1–11]. The integrity of the endothelial lining is affected by many factors during harvest. Using epifluorescence multiphoton imaging techniques, we have previously shown that the pH, temperature, SV distention, and composition of storage solution can affect the endothelial viability and function [4, 12–15]. Similarly, surgical manipulation can also damage the endothelium of SV grafts, increasing the risk of vasospasm, thrombogenesis, occlusive intimal hyperplasia, and stenosis [4, 5, 10, 11].
Saphenous vein has traditionally been harvested using an open surgical technique with minimal manipulation of the vein . However, many centers have adapted to the minimally invasive surgical technique of endoscopic saphenous vein harvest (EVH) because of patient preference and decreased incidence of, lower extremity morbidity, related to cellulitis and wound infection, hematoma, seroma, edema, and saphenous neuropathy and neuralgia compared to the open technique [17–25]. The recently published secondary analysis of PREVENT-4 study compared outcomes after on-pump vs off-pump CABGs and reported SV graft occlusion rates of 46.7% at 12-18 months, far in excess of historical assumptions by cardiovascular surgeons. More concerning, they found EVH to be an independent predictor of decreased SV graft patency at one year, the cause of which was not defined, warranting further investigations . Likewise, a recently completed randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) trial has concluded that EVH was associated with lower SV graft patency at 1-year and higher rate of perioperative myocardial infarction and need for revascularization within 1-year compared to OSVH . Although both the PREVENT IV and ROOBY studies were not randomized with regard to the SV harvest technique, their findings are of great concern due to the large number of cases that were evaluated.
Although the EVH procedures utilizing the currently available technology follow a similar minimally invasive technique, differences still exist due to the unique properties of different devices as well as the experience of surgical operator. This study design evaluates viability of veins harvested by the VirtuoSaph endoscopic vein harvesting technique and OSVH methodology. The OSVH consisted of removing the saphenous vein with perivascular tissue in the traditional open fashion with "No-touch" technique. We compared the viability and functionality of SV endothelium between VsEVH, and OSVH as an internal control, using three independent techniques: 1) epifluorescence multiphoton microscopy (MPM); 2) immunofluorescence and; 3) biochemical assays.
Study Design and Experimental Protocol
This study was designed to be consistent with our earlier study . Patients, ages 56 - 82, (average 69.3 years), scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery at the Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta, were prospectively identified for the evaluation of VirtuoSaph endoscopic harvest instrumentation and technique. The vein samples were collected according to the protocol approved by the Human Studies Subcommittee, and after obtaining informed consent from the patients. Each patient underwent VsEVH for the proximal portion of the vein and OSVH for the distal portion of the vein. Endoscopic incision was located just below the knee, with "No touch" incision in the upper calf; samples were taken to include side branches in every instance. At no time was the vein insufflated with any solution, and the "experimental" endoscopic sample was obtained from the midportion of the thigh segment after exteriorization to accommodate prioritized patient requirements for a suitable bypass conduit. For the VsEVH portion, minimal CO2 insufflation using an open system was used for visualization and dissection of the tissues around the vein. Once the vein was mobilized, the side branches were simultaneously cut and cauterized with the bipolar V-cutter/cautery. The distance between the two sampling areas was (26.58 ± 3.84 cm).
Harvesting techniques were performed by two experienced physician's assistants with over 7 years EVH experience, and greater than 2000 cases performed, respectively. VsEVH was conducted according to Terumo guidelines and training, utilizing the VirtuoSaph Endoscopic Vein Harvesting System (MCVS550, Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan). A two centimeter portions of the VsEVH and OSVH vein were immersed in ice cold GALA, and transported overnight in a CoolPack by FedEx, from Atlanta to our laboratory in VABHS, Boston, MA. Transit time and temperature (20 ± 2.2 hours; 7 ± 2.3°C; respectively) were recorded in the laboratory.
Structural and Functional Assays
Cell Viability Assay
Structural and functional viability of saphenous vein endothelial and smooth muscle cells were assessed with a fluorescence-based Live-Dead (calcein AM/ethidium homodimer) assay and MPM as described [4, 12–14, 28, 29]. The SV segments were incubated with calcein AM and ethidium homodimer dyes (10 μM, final concentration) in 1.5 ml of Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS), pH 7.4, for 30 minutes at 21°C. After incubation, segments were washed three times with HBSS, mounted on the multiphoton microscope stage in an imaging chamber, and viable cells (green fluorescence) and damaged cells (red fluorescence) were imaged as described below.
Measurement of Esterase Activity
The conversion of calcein AM ester (nonfluorescent) to green fluorescent calcein by the esterases in living cells was used as a marker of esterase activity in the endothelial cells of the vein segments. Saphenous vein lumen and endothelial cell layer were identified by XYZ scanning using MPM. Specifically, five different regions of uniform size were marked on the endothelial cells in the lumen of each segment using image processing software (MetaMorph Imaging Series; Universal Imaging, Corp., West Chester, PA). Total integrated fluorescence intensity (photon counting) in the marked regions of the endothelium was measured as a function of esterase activity in the SV segments using MetaMorph [4, 12–14, 28, 29].
Intracellular Calcium Mobilization and Nitric Oxide Generation
Calcium mobilization and nitric oxide generation in the endothelial cells of the SV was measured using calcium sensitive calcium orange dye and nitric oxide specific diaminofluorescein (DAF) dye, as previously described [4, 12–14, 28, 29]. Resting calcium levels and basal/tonic activity of eNOS were measured in the absence of bradykinin stimulation. The segments were imaged using MPM, and bradykinin stimulated calcium mobilization and nitric oxide generation were assessed in real time over the course of 10 minutes and quantified as described below.
Quantitative Analysis of Calcium and Nitric Oxide
Calcium mobilization and nitric oxide generation were measured by recording changes in calcium orange and DAF fluorescence using MPM imaging, before and after bradykinin treatment as described [4, 12–14, 28, 29]. Typically, five specific regions were drawn along the endothelial region of the lumen for each vein segment using MetaMorph image processing software. Fluorescence intensity was integrated over all pixels within the boundary of each individually enclosed area and the quantum yield was measured in calcium and nitric oxide fluorescence channels, respectively. The fluorescence intensity from each image was normalized by values determined from a reference image recorded before bradykinin treatment [4, 12–14, 28, 29].
Vein frozen sections were labeled with primary caveolin 1, eNOS, Cadherin and von Willebrand factor (vWF) antibodies as described [28, 29]. After primary antibody labeling, sections were washed 3X with PBS and labeled with either fluorescein and/or texas red conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200 dilution) in PBS for 2 hours at 21°C. Labeled samples were washed 3X with PBS, mounted and imaged using MPM.
Imaging and fluorescence measurements in all samples were performed with a Zeiss LSM 710 Confocal-MaiTai multiphoton imaging system (Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Inc., Thornwood, NY; Spectra-Physics, Mountain View, CA) as described previously [4, 12–14, 28, 29] in transmission and epifluorescence mode. The 512 × 512 pixel images were collected in direct detection configuration at a pixel resolution of 0.484 μm. The endothelial cell layers were identified by XYZ scanning and imaged at depths of 50 μm away from the site of excision in transverse sections of the SV segments.
Protein extraction and electrophoresis were performed as described [28, 29]. All SV samples were processed at 4°C. Twenty milligrams of SV was cut into 300 small pieces and suspended in 200 ml of CelLytic MT Lysis/Extraction buffer (Sigma) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). The tissue was homogenized, centrifuged and the protein concentration in the supernatant was measured using the Bio-Rad protein assay. Equal amount of total proteins (50 mg) were resolved on 7.5%, 10% or 12% SDS-PAGE, and electro-blotted onto the nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad). Blots were incubated with anti- caveolin 1, eNOS, cadherin, and vWF antibodies (1:1000) and were subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies (1:8000; DAKO). Bound antibodies were detected using ECL (Amersham Biosciences, Sweden). The blots were imaged and analyzed using MetaMorph, [28, 29].
Different individuals in blinded fashion performed the imaging, data extraction and analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. The differences between the two groups (OSVH and VsEVH) were compared using Student's t-test. Statistical significance was accepted at the 95% confidence level (P < 0.05). The data was derived from n = 475 measurements for esterase activity, and from n = 95 for calcium and nitric oxide assays, respectively, for each group investigated. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9.2, SAS Institution, Gary, NC)
The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript as written. The funding agencies did not play any role in influencing data collection, extraction and interpretation.
Summary of Results
OSVH compared to VsEVH
Calcium Mobilization after BK stimulation
NO production after BK stimulation
Despite the widespread acceptance that arterial grafts are superior to venous conduits in coronary revascularization procedures, the desire to achieve complete revascularization and the relative ease of use of SV conduits has ensured their continued widespread usage. Most cardiovascular surgeons are well aware of the necessity to avoid over distension of the SV conduit during harvest and subsequent preparation, in preventing mechanical disruption of the endothelium. Despite our earlier communication that endovascular harvest techniques resulted in profound intimal injury relative to classic open harvest "No-touch" techniques , patient demand for improved cosmesis and quicker functional recovery has superseded concerns regarding endothelial integrity. Indeed, the mounting evidence that endoscopic saphenous vein harvest can reduce lower extremity morbidity, has led many surgeons to adopt this technique [20–26]. However, the endoscopic technique may result in increased mechanical traction on the vein, promotes possible thermal injury by the use of cautery to control side branches, and result in excessive exposure to an acidotic environment from high CO2 pressure, which may result in impaired endothelial function of the venous conduits. Therefore, development of both, adequate instrumentation and reproducible technique of endoscopic harvest to overcome these draw backs is of prime importance. We hope to continue to address these issues at the basic level, with our previous , current, and ongoing studies, to be able to provide informed choices for the cardiac surgeons in deciding open or endoscopic harvesting for improved conduit quality and long-term outcomes for the patients.
In this investigation, as the SVs from harvest to analysis involved substantial transit time, and cold, albeit, potentially variable temperature exposure, it was of primary concern to us that the vessels remain fully viable during this period. We have previously shown that GALA surgical conduit preservation solution, used in our hospital for CABG and peripheral vascular surgery, maintains the structural and functional viability of the blood vessel endothelium during short- and long-term (over 24 hour) storage . This coupled with excellent graft patency, and long-term outcomes in over 3000 patients treated with GALA in our VA hospital convinced us that GALA would be an ideal solution for preservation and transport of the SV samples to our laboratory. That, GALA indeed preserves the morphological and physiological viability of SV conduits during transit, was reconfirmed by the fact that the vein samples remained structurally and functionally intact, with no visible morphological change, membrane damage or loss of proteins, and with robust calcium mobility, eNOS activity and NO generation, Figures 1-6. Measured values of these samples were within the range for those of freshly harvested and analyzed SVs as reported by us [4, 12–14, 28, 29].
We have previously shown that the endothelium is substantially damaged during harvesting of SV using an endoscopic technique . The parameters of endothelial structure and function were altered significantly in the endoscopic samples, including the impairment of esterase activity, calcium mobilization and nitric oxide generation. Additionally, extensive stretching and disruption of membrane proteins, demonstrating damage to the endothelium and the smooth muscle cells were also observed . In contrast, in this study, harvesting of the SV using the VirtuoSaph did not reveal any structural and functional cellular damage. Morphological structure, esterase activity and endothelial viability were well maintained in the endoscopic samples (VsEVH), similar to those observed in the corresponding samples harvested by the "No touch" open technique (OSVH), Figures 1-4.
These findings were also confirmed by using two other independent assessment techniques. Immunofluorescence labeling of vessel samples demonstrated that expression, localization and distribution of caveolin, eNOS, vWF and cadharin were well preserved in VsEVH endothelium similar to those in OSVH samples, Figure 5. Equally, Western blot analysis demonstrated that the endothelial proteins were well conserved in samples from both groups, Figure 6. These results clearly demonstrate that unlike our previous observation , endoscopic harvesting of SV using VituoSaph does not cause structural damage to the endothelium and the smooth muscle.
Even though we did not observe any visible and measureable changes in caveolin and eNOS in the endothelium of VsEVH samples, the calcium mobilization and nitric oxide production appeared to be differentially altered. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, Bradykinin stimulated mobilization of calcium and eNOS mediated nitric oxide generation was deceased in VsEVH samples in comparison to the OSVH samples, indicating attenuation of endothelial function, confirming our earlier observation . Preservation of bypass conduit eNOS activity and nitric oxide generation has important implications on immediate graft function, long-term patency and patient outcomes. Because nitric oxide induces vasodilation, inhibits platelet and neutrophil adhesion and prevents atherosclerosis, the impaired ability of the endoscopically harvested SV endothelium to produce nitric oxide, may lead to attenuated vasomotor function with significant implications on graft patency and patient outcomes. It is not clear, however, that the impairment we observed in the endothelial response is permanent or of clinical significance. It is possible that this defect may reverse with time, especially as VsEVH samples do not demonstrate any membrane damage and alteration in the functional protein components, Figures 5 and 6, unlike our previous observations .
Multiphoton imaging in the transmission mode did not demonstrate any endothelial disruption in the VsEVH samples, Figure 1. Even though this observation may contradict our functional (calcium/nitric oxide) assays, it is not imperative to observe disrupted endothelium to observe attenuated function. Perhaps some stretching and/or manipulation of the vessel inherent in VsEVH technique were sufficient to temporarily impair endothelium function. There is also the possibility that cautery thermal effects and CO2 insufflation used in VsEVH techniques, though minimal with VirtuoSaph, could potentially be harmful to the vein and may be responsible for our observations. We are currently in the process of evaluating the effects of CO2 on vein structure and function to eliminate one possibility.
The principal findings of this investigation is that unlike in our previous endoscopic harvesting study , extraction of the SV using the VirtuoSaph lends to preservation of morphological structure and biochemical function in the conduit. These results imply that it is not the EVH technique per se that causes conduit damage and eventual graft failures [26, 27] but other pertinent factors may contribute to this problem. However, comparative studies are required to examine not only graft patency rates at one year postoperatively, but also patient outcomes with respect to the technique used to harvest the SV conduits. Irrespective of method of endoscopic harvest used, proper instrumentation, procedural training and technical expertise of the personnel involved in the process is of crucial importance to preserve the saphenous vein as a truly viable bypass conduit.
We thank Holly Smith, PA-C and E. Allen Morgan Jr., PA, Robert Langford, PA, (Terumo) for their expertise and for they're help in collecting the saphenous vein samples. We thank Aditi Thatte for her encouragement and support. This work was supported by VA Merit Review grant, Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC (HST), and Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI (HST).
- Clowes AW, Redy MA, Clowes MM: Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. Lab Invest. 1983, 49: 208-215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fingerle J, Au YP, Clowes AW, Reidy MA: Intimal lesion formation in rat carotid arteries after endothelial denudation in absence of medial injury. Arteriosclerosis. 1990, 10: 1082-1087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stenerman MB, Spaet TH, Pitlick F, Cintron J, Lejnieks I, Tiell ML: Intimal healing: The pattern of reendothelialization and intimal thickening. Am J Pathol. 1977, 87: 125-142.Google Scholar
- Thatte HS, Khuri SF: The coronary artery bypass conduit: Intraoperative endothelial injury and its implication on graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001, 72S2245-S2252.Google Scholar
- LoGerfo FW, Quist WC, Cantelmo NL, Haudenschild CC: Integrity of vein grafts as a function of intitial intimal and medial preservation. Circulation. 1983, 68 (3, Pt.2): II117-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mills NL, Everson CT: Vein graft failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1995, 10 (6): 562-568. 10.1097/00001573-199511000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boncheck LI: Prevention of endothelial damage during preparation of spahenous veins for bypass grafting. J Thorac CArdiovasc Surg. 1980, 79 (6): 911-915.Google Scholar
- Lawrie GM: Endothelial preservation in human saphenous veins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990, 100 (1): 149-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sellke FW, Boyle EM, Verrier ED: Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: The pathophysiology of vasomotor dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996, 62 (4): 1222-1228. 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00538-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Angelini GD, Breckenridge IM, Butchart EG, Armistead SH, Middleton KM, Henderson AH, Newby AC: Metabolic damage to human saphenous vein during preparation for coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiovasc Res. 1985, 19: 326-330. 10.1093/cvr/19.6.326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Catinell FP, Cuningham JN, Srungaram MD, Baumann FG, Nathan IM, Glassman EA, Knopp EA, Spencer FC: The factors influencing early patency of coronary artery bypass vein grafts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982, 83: 686-700.Google Scholar
- Dygert JH, Thatte HS, Khumbhani DJ, Najjar SF, Treanor PR, Khuri SF: Intracoronary shunt-induced endothelial cell damage in porcine heart. J Surg Res. 2006, 131: 168-174. 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biswas KS, Thatte HS, Najjar SF, Rhee JH, Birjiniuk V, Crittenden MD, Michel T, Khuri SF: Multi-photon microscopy in the evaluation of human saphenous vein. J Surg Res. 2001, 95: 37-43. 10.1006/jsre.2000.6019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thatte HS, Biswas KS, Najjar SF, McGarry T, Birjiniuk V, Crittenden MD, Michel T, Khuri SF: Multi-photon microscopic evaluation of sapenous vein endothelium and its preservation with a new solution, GALA. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003, 75: 1145-1152. 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04705-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solberg S, Larsen T, Jorgensen L, Sorlie D: Cold-induced endothelial cell detachment in human saphenous vein grafts. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1987, 28: 571-575.Google Scholar
- Gottlob R: The preservation of the venous endothelium by "dissecting without touching" and by a traumatic technique of vascular anastomosis. Min Chir. 1977, 32: 693-700.Google Scholar
- Jordan WD, Voellinger DC, Schroeder PT, McDowell HA: Video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: the evolution of a new technique. J Vasc Surgery. 1997, 26: 405-414. 10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70033-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voellinger DC, Jordan WD: Video-assisted vein harvest: a single institution experience of 103 peripheral bypass cases. Vasc Surg. 1998, 32: 545-557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lumsden AB, Eaves FF, Ofenloch JC, Jordan WD: Subcutaneous, video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: report of the first 30 cases. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996, 4: 771-776. 10.1016/S0967-2109(96)00055-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis Z, Jacobs HK, Zhang M, Thomas C, Castellanos Y: Endoscopic vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: technique and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998, 116: 228-235. 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70121-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Matheny RG, Schier JJ, Fitzgerald EB, Shaar CJ: Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998, 66: 26-32. 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00392-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puskas JD, Wright CE, Miller PK, Anderson TE, Gott JP, Brown WM, Guyton RA: A randomized trial of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest in coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999, 68: 1509-1512. 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00952-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crouch JD, O'Hair DP, Keuler JP, Barragry TP, Werner PH, Kleinman LH: Open versus endoscopic vein harvesting: wound complications vein quality. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999, 69: 1513-1516.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayward TZ, Hey LA, Newman LL, Duhaylongsod FG, Hayward KA, Lowe JE, Smith PK: Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: the effect on postoperative outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999, 68: 2107-2111. 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01181-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carpino PA, Khabbaz KR, Bojar RM, Rastegar H, Warner KG, Murphy RE, Payne DD: Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000, 119: 69-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, Freguson TB, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, Mehta RH, Gibson CM, Mack MJ, Kouchoukos NT, Califf RM, Alexander JH: Endoscopic versus Open Vein-Graft Harvesting in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 235-244. 10.1056/NEJMoa0900708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zenati MA, Shroyer AL, Collins JF, Hattler B, Ota T, Almassi GH, Amidi M, Novitzky D, Grover FL, Sonel AF: Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous graft harvest technique upon CABG patient outcomes in the randomized ROOBY trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011, 141: 338-344. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rousou L, Taylor K, Lu XG, Crittenden M, Haime M, Khuri SF, Thatte HS: Saphenous Vein Conduits harvested by Endoscopic Technique Exhibit Structural and Functional Damage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 87: 62-70. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thatte HS, Rousou L, Hussaini BE, Lu XG, Treanor PR, Khuri SF: Development and Evaluation of a Novel solution, Somah, for the Procurement and Preservation of Beating and Non-beating Donor Hearts for Transplantation. Circulation. 2009, 120: 1704-1713. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808907.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.