Using a double-plicated posterior leaflet as an anchor for mitral valve replacement: a case of mitral annular calcification
© Taguchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 25 November 2012
Accepted: 26 March 2013
Published: 1 April 2013
We present a 62-year-old man with mitral regurgitation whose posterior annulus had severe calcification. Mitral valve replacement was performed by anchoring the cuff on a double-plicated posterior leaflet, and reinforcing with an equine pericardium. The patient is doing well 13 years after surgery with echocardiography showing no problems.
KeywordsMitral valve replacement Mitral regurgitation Mitral annular calcification Equine pericardium
Mitral regurgitation (MR) with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) forces surgeons into a difficult situation when deciding on a surgical method. Many authors have described specific mitral valve replacement (MVR) methods for MAC. Although managing a patient to prevent complications in the early postoperative phase is important, long-term stability without recurrence of MR is the bottom line for a patient’s quality of life, even with MAC. We were able to obtain good results 13 years after an atypical valve operation. This report evaluates the operation and the results.
Post-operative course was without significant problems. Since discharge, he has been followed-up for 13 years. He is enjoying a normal life without major symptoms. A recent transthoracic echocardiogram showed no perivalvular leakage (Figure 3B) and no problems around the pericardial patch.
This is a report on an operative technique for managing MAC, which emphasizes durability, and on long-term follow-up over a period of 13 years. The results of recent echocardiography around the prosthetic valve were excellent, and the patient is doing very well. Few reports of such a long-term follow-up after this type of surgery have been published.
MVR methods for MR with MAC can be divided into 2 types. One is a technique that attempts to resect MAC as much as possible, and the other leaves MAC intact by devising a method for suturing the prosthesis.
Surgery to resect MAC is often challenging because calcification is often deep, and there is a probable risk when excavating the area around the posterior atrio-ventricular groove of rupture, injury to circumflex artery, and thrombo-embolic events. To prevent these events, ultrasonic debridement is often used, and methods such as using autologous or equine pericardium, and transferring the anterior leaflet to the posterior area are adopted.
The best way to prevent these disadvantages when resecting MAC is to leave it intact, and to develop new methods of suturing the prosthetic valve. Many reports have been published on possible solutions such as: suturing the prosthesis to the LA itself, developing a collar for the prosthesis, using the leaflets to secure the prosthesis, plicating both mitral leaflets and the LA to create a new annulus, and using a Dacron graft between the LA and the prosthesis.
The advantages of our method are that folding the posterior leaflet twice creates a new annulus above the MAC, and using the equine pericardium reinforces the suture and acts as a preventive sheet to avoid perivalvular leakage. By preserving the posterior leaflet, the subvalvular apparatus is also maintained. Our method of suturing the prosthesis to the posterior leaflet is similar to that of Di Stefano et al., who plicated the mitral leaflets and the atrial wall to create a new annulus. Although we used only the equine pericardium-covered posterior leaflet as a new annulus, we plicated the leaflet twice. This made the leaflet more solid and suitable as an anchor for suturing the prosthesis. Equine pericardium was used to reinforce this anchor because the leaflet alone might not be structurally sufficient even if plicated twice.
Feindel et al. used pericardium to reconstruct the MAC resected area and to create a new annulus for MVR. Our usage of pericardium is similar to them in the aspect of being a part of the new annulus for MVR, but different from them in the aspect of constituting the new annulus together with the posterior leaflet.
We must mention that this operation was performed in only 1 patient. Although long-term durability of the procedure was proven in the presented case, multiple experiences using the procedure are needed for further evaluation.
In summary of the presented case, using the double-plicated posterior leaflet as an anchor in MVR and equine pericardium as a reinforcement resulted in an excellent long-term outcome for MR with MAC.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
- Atoui R, Lash V, Mohammadi S, Cecere R: Intra-atrial implantation of a mitral valve prosthesis in a heavily calcified mitral annulus. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009, 36: 776-778. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feindel CM, Tufail Z, David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S: Mitral valve surgery in patients with extensive calcification of the mitral annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003, 126: 777-782. 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00081-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casselman FP, Gillinov AM, McDonald ML, Cosgrove DM: Use of the anterior mitral leaflet to reinforce the posterior mitral annulus after debridement of calcium. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999, 68: 261-262. 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00337-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nataf P, Pavie A, Jault F, Bors V, Cabrol C, Gandjbakhch I: Intraatrial insertion of a mitral prosthesis in a destroyed or calcified mitral annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994, 58: 163-167. 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91092-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coselli JS, Crawford ES: Calcified mitral valve annulus: prosthesis insertion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988, 46: 584-586. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)64709-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Stefano S, Lopez J, Florez S, Rey J, Arevalo A, San Roman A: Building a new annulus: a technique for mitral valve replacement in heavily calcified annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 87: 1625-1627. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.