Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery – the effects of age, preoperative conditions and postoperative complications

  • Vojtěch Kurfirst1Email author,
  • Aleš Mokráček1,
  • Martina Krupauerová2,
  • Júlia Čanádyová1,
  • Alan Bulava3, 4,
  • Ladislav Pešl3 and
  • Věra Adámková4, 5
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery20149:46

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-46

Received: 12 September 2013

Accepted: 4 February 2014

Published: 11 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Factors influencing the postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after cardiac surgery have not been well described yet, mainly in the older people. The study’s aim was to explore differences in clinical conditions and HRQOL of patients before and after cardiac surgery taking into account the influence of age and to describe factors influencing changes of HRQOL in the postoperative period.

Methods

This was a prospective consecutive observational study with two measurements using the SF-36 questionnaire before surgery and 1 year after surgery. It considered main clinical characteristics of participants prior to surgery as well as postoperative complications.

Results

At baseline assessment the study considered 310 patients, predominantly male (69%). Mean age was 65 (SD 10.4) years and 101 patients (33%), who were older than 70, constituted the older group. This older group showed greater comorbidity, higher cardiac operative risk and lower HRQOL in the preoperative period as well as a higher prevalence of postoperative complications than the younger group. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% in the younger group and 6.9% in the older group (p < 0.001). One year mortality was 3.3% in the younger group and 10.9% in the older group (p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in all 8 health domains of the SF-36 questionnaire (p < 0.001) in the overall sample. There was no significant difference in change in a majority of HRQOL domains between the younger and the older group (p > 0.05). Logistic multivariate analysis identified a higher values of preoperative PCS (Physical component summary) scores (OR 1.03, CI 1.00 – 1.05, p = 0.0187) and MCS (Mental component summary) scores (OR 1.02, CI 0.997 – 1.00, p = 0.0846) as the only risk factors for potential non-improvement of HRQOL after cardiac surgery after correction for age, gender and type of surgery.

Conclusions

Older patients with higher operative risk have lower preoperative HRQOL but show a similar improvement in a majority of HRQOL domains after cardiac surgery as compared with younger patients. The multivariate analysis has shown the higher preoperative HRQOL status as a only significant factor of potential non-improvement of postoperative HRQOL.

Keywords

Health-related quality of life Postoperative complications Older patients Cardiac surgery

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an increasingly important aspect in assessing the outcome of any surgical intervention [1]. Simultaneously life expectancy has increased, particularly in recent decades, thus leading to an increase in the numbers of an aging population undergoing cardiac surgery [2]. Age is an independent factor in calculating the risk of death during cardiac surgery [3, 4]. Because older patients usually suffer from comorbidities which can make the course of an operation significantly longer [5], and also because they have lower functional reserves [6], there is a higher prevalence of postoperative complications or death. Studies concerning the influence of age on postoperative HRQOL have produced differing conclusions. While some have presented better postoperative HRQOL outcomes for younger patients [7], others have found the opposite [8]. The influence of age on HRQOL has not yet been definitively demonstrated.

In the postoperative period, the most frequent complications has been described as supraventricular arrhythmia, infection, cognitive impairment, as well as respiratory and renal insufficiency [9]. Older patients are also given more units of red blood cell transfusion, which corresponds to a higher incidence of preoperative anemia, smaller capacity of the hematopoietic system, and a lower tolerance of postoperative hypohemoglobinaemia [10]. Providing a greater number of red cell units has been identified as an independent factor in postoperative mortality [11]. Although these complications have been well described, there is still not enough information about the impact of postoperative complications on HRQOL.

The SF-36 questionnaire is often used as a tool for assessing the quality of life in various medical fields, where it is valued especially for its ability to capture the social dimensions of life [12]. In cardiology, for example, it has been used in patients with ischaemic heart disease [13], in the course of heart failure [14], or in the presence of atrial fibrillation [15]. In cardiac surgery, an assessment of HRQOL by means of the SF-36 questionnaire has been used in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization [16], after surgery on heart valves [17, 18] or the thoracic aorta [19], and after interventions for cardiac arrhythmias [20]. It also has proven effective in patients after valve replacement with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis which when closing produces a clicking sound [21].

The aim of this study was to assess the HRQOL of two groups of patients (age ≤70 and >70 years) by using the SF-36 questionnaire and to compare clinical data from the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods experienced by these groups. A second aim was to identify a group of patients who do not benefit from the surgery (non-improvers) and to find potential risk factors for unimproved quality of life after cardiac surgery.

Methods

The study was carried out with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Hospital of České Budějovice. In the period from January 2008 to June 2009, 873 patients were operated on in the Cardiac Surgery Department of Hospital České Budějovice. All patients included in this study were operated on by a single surgeon, and the total number of patients was 310. All procedures were performed in a standard manner using extracorporeal circulation and during heart arrest. No off-pump procedures were used in the study population. The grafts used during revascularization procedures were LIMA (left internal mammary artery) and vein grafts. The inclusion criteria were: elective cardiac surgery, agreement with participation in the study, and written informed consent. Patients undergoing urgent cardiac surgery and patients who refused to participate in the study were excluded. SF-36 questionnaires were completed before surgery and 1 year after discharge from the hospital. All patients participating in the study had agreed to do so, and written informed consent was obtained.

The SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate HRQOL of patients included in this study. Evaluation of HRQOL using the SF-36 is based on 8 domains covering the physical, mental, and social life of the individual. These domains are as follow: Physical functioning, Role physical, Role emotional, Social functioning, Bodily pain, Mental health, Vitality and General health. Questions are related to the period 4 weeks before completion of the questionnaire, and therefore the evaluation is not influenced by transitory changes in status. Answers are then converted to 0-100 scale for each health domain where higher values indicate better health status. A standardized procedure is used for interpreting responses given to the SF-36 questionnaire [22, 23].

Clinical data from the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative period were collected from medical records. All clinical variables and events were defined according to standard European Society of Cardiology definitions.

The differences between the preoperative and postoperative HRQOL were assessed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. The total number of patients was divided into two groups (age ≤70 and >70 years) and an HRQOL assessment was performed 1 year after surgery, after which we analyzed and compared the two groups of patients. We also compared HRQOL between survivors and non-survivors. The differences between subgroups were compared by unpaired t-test and χ2 test.

For all subgroups, p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to examine the association between preoperative variables (preoperative PCS and MCS, age, gender, type of surgery) and postoperative HRQOL improvement. Improvement was defined as a positive increase in postoperative SF-36 subscales.

Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were used for the multivariate analysis. The PCS and MCS scores are two meta-scores of the SF-36 calculated from the SF-36 questionnaire and reflect a patient’s overall physical and mental health status. PCS is consisted of these domains of SF-36 questionnaire: Physical functioning, Role physical, Bodily pain, Vitality and General health. MCS is consisted of these domains: Role emotional, Social functioning and Mental health. These summary scales were used in this study as the primary health-related HRQOL variable for the multivariate analysis. Non-improvers were defined as patients with difference ≤ 0 between preoperative and postoperative quality of life in both PCS and MCS scores. Improvers were defined as patients with difference > 0 between preoperative and postoperative quality of life in PCS or MCS or both scores.

Patients’ risk scores were obtained via the EuroSCORE calculator, which is free accessible at the web site http://www.euroscore.org. The mortality data were obtained via the registry of the Czech Society of Cardiovascular Surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA 10 [24] and XLSTAT version 2011 [25].

Results

Preoperative characteristics of the 310 patients are summarized in Table 1. Men accounted for 69% of the patients, and the mean age was 65 ± 10.4 years. In the preoperative period, the older group showed a higher prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.026), atrial arrhythmia (p < 0.001), renal dysfunction (p = 0.008), cerebrovascular disease (p = 0.045), and anemia (p = 0.027). Their collective EuroSCORE was also higher (p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in the durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp, or anesthesia times between the two groups of patients (Table 2).
Table 1

Preoperative clinical characteristics of all patients

 

Age ≤70 years

Age >70 years

p

Variables

No.

Mean

%

No.

Mean

%

 

Total

209

 

67.4

101

 

32.6

 

Male

156

 

74.6

56

 

55.4

0.001

Age (years)

 

59.9

  

75.4

 

<0.001

Reoperation

11

 

5.3

4

 

4.0

0.617

Prior PCI

35

 

16.7

11

 

10.9

0.174

History of MI

31

 

14.8

12

 

12.9

0.771

Hypertension

126

 

60.3

80

 

79.2

0.001

Diabetes mellitus

53

 

25.4

38

 

37.6

0.026

Supraventricular arrhythmia

26

 

12.4

33

 

32.7

<0.001

COPD

27

 

12.9

8

 

7.9

0.192

Renal dysfunction

25

 

12.0

24

 

23.8

0.008

Cerebral vascular disease

15

 

7.2

14

 

13.9

0.058

History of CVA

10

 

4.8

11

 

10.9

0.045

PAD

8

 

3.8

4

 

4.0

0.100

Anemia

9

 

4.3

11

 

10.9

0.027

EuroSCORE

 

4.3

  

10.5

 

<0.001

LVEF (%)

 

59.6

  

60.9

 

0.372

Age of patients not included in the QoL assessment

 

61.1

  

76.3

 

<0.001

EuroSCORE of patients not included in the QoL assessment

 

3.8

  

11.2

 

<0.001

No. – number, Reoperation – previous cardiac operation, PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, MI – myocardial infarction, Diabetes mellitus – treated by subcutaneous insulin or by oral antidiabetics, Supraventricular arrhythmia – atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Renal dysfunction – serum creatinine ≥ 120 umol/l, Cerebral vascular disease – stenosis of carotid artery >70%, CVA – cerebrovascular accident, PAD – peripheral artery disease, Anemia – serum hemoglobin < 12 g/dL (women) or < 13 g/dL (men), LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction.

Table 2

Perioperative clinical characteristics of the studied patients

Variables

Age ≤70 years

Age >70 years

p

 

No.

Mean

%

SD

No.

Mean

%

SD

 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

73

 

34.9

 

39

 

38.6

 

<0.001

Valve procedures

75

 

35.9

 

25

 

24.8

 

<0.001

Combined procedures

61

 

29.2

 

37

 

36.6

 

0.038

Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min)

 

87.2

 

41.5

 

88.4

 

30.1

0.795

Aortic cross-clamp time (min)

 

62.0

 

35.9

 

59.3

 

22.4

0.495

Anesthesia time (min)

 

255.2

 

55.4

 

259.7

 

51.9

0.505

In the postoperative period, the prevalences of cerebrovascular events (p = 0.001), renal failure (p = 0.018), infection (p = 0.005), and cognitive impairment (p = 0.006) were also higher in the older group (Table 3). The number of packed red blood cell units given in the postoperative period was higher in the older group (p = 0.012). Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% (3 patients) in the younger group and 6.9% (7 patients) in the older group (p < 0.001). One year mortality was 3.3% (7 patients) in the younger group and 10.9% (11 patients) in the older group (p < 0.001). The median length of ICU/hospital stay was 2/7 days in the younger group and 2/8 days in the older group.
Table 3

Postoperative complications and additionally assessed variables

 

Age ≤70 years

Age >70 years

p

Variables

No.

Mean

%

No.

Mean

%

 

Inotropic drug support required

81

 

38.9

44

 

43.4

0.446

MI

4

 

1.9

1

 

1.0

0.543

CVA

10

 

0.5

7

 

6.9

0.001

Supraventricular arrhythmia

88

 

42.1

51

 

50.5

0.164

Ventricular arrhythmia

7

 

3.3

2

 

2.0

0.502

Renal failure

7

 

3.3

10

 

9.9

0.018

Infection

21

 

10.0

22

 

21.8

0.005

Reexploration for bleeding

7

 

3.3

3

 

3.0

0.862

Cognitive impairment

17

 

8.1

19

 

18.8

0.006

Ventilation problems

10

 

4.8

8

 

7.9

0.269

Sternal wound infection

8

 

3.8

4

 

4.0

1.000

Packed red blood cells (units)

 

2.1

  

3.1

 

0.012

Platelets (units)

 

0.3

  

0.2

 

0.731

Fresh frozen plasma (units)

 

1.6

  

2.4

 

0.090

Median ICU stay time (days)

2 (1 – 27)

  

2 (1 – 32)

  

0.095

Median hospital stay time (days)

7 (4 – 41)

  

8 (4 – 44)

  

0.661

MI – myocardial infarction, CVA – cerebrovascular accident, Supraventricular arrhythmia – atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, Ventricular arrhythmia – ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, Renal failure – increase of serum creatinine > 80 mmol/l with or without need for temporary dialysis, Infection – infection of respiratory or urinary system, Cognitive impairment – psychomotor agitation with the necessity of therapeutic intervention, Ventilation problems – symptoms of partial and/or global respiratory failure with or without need for reintubation, ICU – intensive care unit.

Completed SF-36 questionnaires 1 year after surgery were obtained from 260 patients (84%) and used for the statistical assessment. Incomplete SF-36 questionnaires from 19 patients as well as unreturned questionnaires from another 31 patients (18 patients died in the study period, 13 patients did not return the questionnaire) were not considered in the statistical assessment. The characteristics of the patients returning incomplete SF-36 questionnaires or not returning the questionnaire are given in Table 1. The results of changes in preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores are presented in Table 4. Postoperative SF-36 scores of the study group significantly improved in all 8 health domains: Physical functioning, Role physical, Bodily pain, General health, Vitality, Social functioning, Role emotional, and Mental health. Next, patients were divided into two groups according to their age (age ≤70 years and >70 years). The preoperative SF-36 scores for HRQOL were relatively higher for the younger group (Table 5), and we found relatively greater differences between preoperative and postoperative HRQOL domains in the group age >70 years. The only statistically significant difference between the younger and the older groups, however, was in the perception of bodily pain domain(p = 0.03), which improved more in the older group of patients. Comparison of postoperative SF-36 results between these two groups is presented in Table 6.
Table 4

SF-36 scores of the study population before and one year after cardiac surgery

 

Before surgery

One year after surgery

p

 

n = 260

n = 260

 

Sub-score

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

 

PF

48.2

28.1

65.5

24.1

<0.001

RP

28.8

37.3

51.1

38.8

<0.001

BP

59.1

25.9

73.9

23.4

<0.001

GH

46.9

17.2

51.8

17.9

<0.001

VT

48.3

19.9

57.4

18.9

<0.001

SF

66.1

22.1

73.6

22.7

<0.001

RE

42.6

42.3

67.9

35.3

<0.001

MH

59.7

20.3

70.6

16.5

<0.001

PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health.

Table 5

SF-36 scores of patient groups age ≤70 and >70 years before cardiac surgery

 

Age ≤70 years

Age >70 years

p

 

n = 179

n = 81

 

Sub-score

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

 

PF

54.2

28.1

35.1

25.4

<0.001

RP

34.2

39.3

16.7

29.6

<0.001

BP

62.7

26.6

51.3

22.8

<0.001

GH

48.6

17.8

43.1

15.4

<0.001

VT

50.6

21.0

43.1

16.5

<0.001

SF

68.3

22.4

61.3

21.0

<0.001

RE

48.2

43.3

30.0

37.1

<0.001

MH

62.3

20.4

54.9

19.4

<0.001

PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health.

Table 6

Differences in SF-36 scores before and 1 year after cardiac surgery between patient groups age ≤70 years and >70 years

 

Age ≤70 years

Age >70 years

p

 

n = 179

n = 81

 

Sub-score

Difference

SD

Difference

SD

 

PF

15.4

29.2

21.2

27.4

0.13

RP

20.7

47.6

25.9

48.8

0.41

BP

11.9

31.4

21.2

32.7

0.03

GH

4.2

22.1

6.4

17.6

0.43

VT

8.4

23.5

10.8

22.1

0.43

SF

6.2

27.3

10.2

26.3

0.27

RE

22.9

50.3

30.9

47.7

0.23

MH

9.7

21.7

13.7

21.7

0.17

PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health.

When comparing the subgroups of survivors and non-survivors, we found significant differences in all 8 HRQOL domains of the preoperative SF-36 questionnaire (Figure 1). There were 16% of non-improvers, 10% of patients improved only in PCS scores, 9.5% of patients improved only in MCS scores and 64% of patients in our group improved in both PCS and MCS scores of HRQOL. The characteristics of improvers and non-improvers are listed in Table 7. The results from multivariate analysis demonstrate that among the preoperative variables only preoperative HRQOL status was a significant factor associated with potential non-improvement in postoperative quality of life (Table 8). The highest risk of non-improvement was found in those patients having higher preoperative PCS and MCS scores.
Figure 1

SF-36 differences in preoperative HRQOL between survivors and non-survivors.

Table 7

Characteristics of improvers and non-improvers group

 

Improvers

Non-improvers

 
 

n = 218

n = 42

 

Variables

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

p-value

Ejection fraction (%)

61.0

11.4

61.2

11.5

0.93

Age

65.6

9.5

63.3

10.0

0.17

BMI

29.3

4.6

30.0

5.2

0.4

ICU stay time (days)

3.2

2.8

3.3

1.9

0.75

Hospital stay time (days)

9.1

5.4

11.5

8.8

0.09

Preoperative PCS

40.9

23.6

66.5

23.7

<0.001

Postoperative PCS

66.5

23.3

46.2

20.2

<0.001

Preoperative MCS

52.1

23.2

74.9

20.0

<0.001

Postoperative MCS

73.9

18.8

54.1

22.4

<0.001

BMI – Body mass index, ICU – Intensive care unit, PCS – Physical component summary, MCS – Mental component summary.

Table 8

Multivariate analysis of influence of preoperative PCS and MCS scores on postoperative quality of life improvement

Variable

Regression coefficient

Odds ratio

Confidence interval (95%)

P value

Gender

   

0.3155

Age >70 years

   

0.1103

Type of surgery

   

0.1931

Preoperative PCS

0.026

1.03

1.00 – 1.05

0.0187

Preoperative MCS

0.022

1.02

0.997 – 1.00

0.0846

Constant

- 4.415

   

PCS – Preoperative physical component summary, MCS – Preoperative physical component summary; in brackets are P values for preoperative MCS status.

Discussion

The main finding of our study is coming up from the multivariate analysis, where the given variables (age, gender, type of surgery, preoperative PCS and MCS) were tested on their influence on potential non-improvement of HRQOL after cardiac surgery. The multivariate analysis has demonstrated, that only the preoperative PCS and MCS status has influence on postoperative change in HRQOL after cardiac surgery. The highest risk of non-improvement in postoperative quality of life was found in patients with higher preoperative PCS and MCS scores. We have also found that non-survivors showed a significantly lower preoperative HRQOL than survivors. Rumsfeld et al. analyzed a set of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization and compared two components of the SF-36 questionnaire (mental and physical) in patients who survived and did not survive the first 6 months after surgery [26]. The results indicate that the preoperative health status was significantly different in the HRQOL of survivors and was the major determinant of change in quality of life following surgery. Factors presented as being associated with failure to achieve a better HRQOL outcome in the postoperative period include the following: one or more preoperative comorbidities and postoperative low cardiac output [27], low preoperative ejection fraction [28], preoperative ICU stay or perioperative complications [29], a higher dyspnea classification, experiencing a new cardiac arrhythmia during or after the surgery, higher pulmonary pressure, previous cardiac surgery, previous myocardial infarction, and manual occupation [14, 30]. Based on these results we can conclude, that patients with distinctly low preoperative HRQOL status are also in very poor clinical conditions and the risk of death is increased. On the other hand, patients with high pre-surgical HRQOL don´t have much room for improvement and their surgery is more preventive in nature.

The most frequent postoperative complications in the group of older patients were previously described as heart failure, dysrhythmia, postoperative bleeding, ventilation problems, neurophysical disorders, myocardial dysfunction, and renal failure [6]. In our study, there were also higher incidences of respiratory and urinary tract infections and higher numbers of red cell units given in the group of patients age >70 years. Engoren et al. describe the same situation between groups of septuagenarians and octogenarians, and they also report hospital costs 35% higher for the octogenarians because of postoperative complications [11]. In another study, Dumbor et al. take into account the economic dimension and refer to several factors which increase hospital costs: high preoperative risk as determined by scoring systems, unintended procedures, the total red cell units used, invasive monitoring, prolonged postoperative ventilation, length of stay in ICU, incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and infection, and overall length of hospital stay. According to their calculations, the costs of treatment for patients age >70 years are 91% higher than are those for patients age ≤70 years [31]. Frelich et al. mention 15% higher hospital costs in patients age >70 years [6]. In the present situation, when the economic view on medical care is projecting more and more into everyday practice, our efforts should be oriented toward these high-risk patients because most of the complications are related to preoperative status and can be reduced through careful preoperative conditioning, gentle operating techniques, and appropriate postoperative care. In cardiac surgery, as in other fields, there continue to be developed new operating methods (e.g., minimally invasive) that are directed to older patients and which decrease the risk of postoperative complications and mortality while also reducing economic costs [32].

The HRQOL improves early after cardiac operations an remains relatively constant in the long term even after three years [33], what makes the period of one year after surgery sufficient for HRQOL observation. Despite the higher incidence of complications in the older group, we have found no difference in postoperative HRQOL between the groups age ≤70 years and >70 years except Bodily pain, which improved more in the older group. Same result was also described by the group of Gjeilo [34]. We observed relatively higher values of preoperative SF-36 scores for HRQOL in younger patients, but the differences between preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores were greater in the older group. This could lead to the conclusion that older patients obtain relatively greater benefit from cardiac surgery than do younger patients in the period of one year after surgery, when most of the postoperative complications have been resolved.

Some of the earlier studies using the SF-36 questionnaire have presented only summaries of the SF-36 scores. For example, they report changes in physical health status (derived from physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health) and mental health status (derived from vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health) [28, 29]. In contrast, we have identified the changes in each of the 8 domains of HRQOL and have thus been able to give a more detailed view of the patient’s quality of life. We have used summaries of the SF-36 only in the multivariate analysis, which, in our opinion, is a better and more convenient tool for use as a predictor of postoperative course.

We should comment also on the limitations of this study. These are mainly attributable to the size of the study population (310 patients) and the follow-up period (1 year). Nevertheless, we believe that this study can be the basis for additional research which could prove our conclusions and provide a stronger tool for identifying older people who are likely to experience HRQOL improvement after cardiac surgery. During the study period none of the operative techniques were changed, and that could probably have reduced the potential bias of our longitudinal sample.

Conclusions

In our opinion, the preoperative HRQOL assessment should be an important part of the preoperative examination, especially in the high-risk patients. Our findings lead us to conclude that older patients with relatively higher cardiac operative risk have lower preoperative HRQOL, but they are more likely to exhibit significant improvement in HRQOL postoperatively. The group of patients age >70 years had more preoperative comorbidities and higher prevalence of postoperative complications, but there was no significant difference in HRQOL in comparison with the younger group of patients 1 year after surgery (except bodily pain domain, which improved more in the older group), which was the main finding of this study. If we are able to offer these patients more gentle operative techniques and appropriate postoperative care, then we can achieve not only significant reduction in the number of postoperative complications and mortality but also improvement in their HRQOL.

Authors’ information

The authors are interested in issues of senior-age care in cardiac surgery. In their everyday practice they are striving to improve preoperative conditioning, surgical techniques and postoperative care in order to minimize operative risk for older patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Abbreviations

HRQOL: 

Health-related quality of life

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

SF-36: 

Short form 36

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

PCS: 

Physical component summary

MCS: 

Mental component summary.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are due to Vit Benda, MSc. for statistical analysis of the acquired data.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Faculty of Health and Social Studies, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (BOV 2012_001).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cardiac Surgery Department, Boženy Němcové str. 54, Hospital České Budějovice
(2)
KardioECHO Cardiology Outpatients Department
(3)
Department of Cardiology, Hospital České Budějovice
(4)
Faculty of Health and Social Studies, University of South Bohemia
(5)
Preventive Cardiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

References

  1. Noyez L, de Jager MJ, Markou ALP: Quality of life after cardiac surgery: underresearch research. Interactiv Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011, 5: 511-515.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Huber CH, Goeber V, Berdat P, Carrel T, Eckstein F: Benefits of cardiac surgery in octogenarians – a postoperative quality of life assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007, 31: 1099-1105. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Frigiola A, Pelissero G: Accuracy, calibration and clinical performance of the EuroSCORE: can we reduce the number of variables?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010, 37: 724-729. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.08.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kolh P, Kerzmann A, Lahaye L, Gerard P, Limet R: Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: perioperative outcome and long-term results. Eur Heart J. 2001, 22: 1235-1243. 10.1053/euhj.2000.2443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Naunheim KS, Dean PA, Fiore AC, McBride LR, Pennington DG, Kaiser GC, Barner HB: Cardiac surgery in the octogenarian. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990, 3: 130-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Frélich M, Štětka F, Pokorný P, Útrata P, Bedáňová H, Ondrášek J, Pavlík P, Wagner R, Černý J: Cardiac surgery in elderly patients. Scripta Medica. 2003, 6: 341-346.Google Scholar
  7. Chocron S, Rude N, Dussaucy A: Quality of life after open-heart surgery in patients over 75 years old. Age Ageing. 1995, 25: 8-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shan L, Saxena A, McMahon R, Wilson A, Newcomb A: A systematic review on the quality of life benefits after aortic valve replacement in the elderly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013, 5: 1173-1189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Engoren M, Arslanian-Engoren C, Steckel D, Neihardt J, Fenn-Buderer N: Cost, outcome, and functional status in octogenarians and septuagenarians after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2002, 4: 1309-1315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Beghé C, Wilson A, Ershler WB: Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in geriatrics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004, 7: 3-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ko W, Krieger KH, Lazenby WD, Shin YT, Goldstein M, Lazzaro R, Isom OW: Isolated coronary artery bypass in one hundred consecutive octogenarian patients. J Thorac Cardiovas Sur. 1991, 102: 532-538.Google Scholar
  12. Petr P, Vurm V, Soukupova A: Czech version of the SF – 36 questionnaire. Kontakt. 2002, 1 (Suppl): 10-15.Google Scholar
  13. Marquis P, Fayol C, Joire JE: Clinical validation of a quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patiens. Eur Heart J. 1995, 11: 1554-1560.Google Scholar
  14. Zuluaga MC, Guallar-Castilón P, Lopéz-García E, Banegas JR, Conde-Herrera M, Olcoz-Chiva M, Rodriguez-Pascual C, Rodriguez-Artaleho F: Generic and disease-specific quality of life as a predictor of long-term mortality in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010, 12: 1372-1378. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van den Berg MP, Hassink RJ, Tuinenburg AE, van Sonderen EFLP, Lefrandt JD, de Kam PJ, van Gelder IC, Smit AJ, Sanderman R, Crijns HJGM: Quality of life in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and its predictors: importance of the autonomic nervous system. Eur Heart J. 2001, 3: 247-253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen BÖ, Hughes P, Rassmusen LS, Pendersen PU, Steinbruchel DA: Health-related quality of life following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly moderate to high-risk patients: a randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006, 8: 294-299.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldsmith IRA, Gregory YHL, Ramesh LP: A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001, 11: 949-955.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen L, Winkel S, Kuhr J, Bader R, Bleese N, Riess FC: Factors influencing survival and postoperative quality of life after mitral valve reconstruction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010, 3: 635-644.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Santini F, Montalbano G, Messina A, D'Onofrio A, Casali G, Viscardi F, Luciani GB, Mazzucco A: Survival and quality of life after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older justify intervention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006, 3: 386-391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lönnerholm S, Blomström P, Nilsson L, Blomström-Lundqvist C: A high quality of life is maintained late after Maze III surgery for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009, 9: 558-562.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Koertke H, Hoffmann-Koch A, Boethig D, Minami K, Breymann T, El-Arousy M, Seifert D, Koerfer R: Does the noise of mechanical heart valve prostheses affect quality of life as measured by the SF-36® questionnaire?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003, 7: 52-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ware JE: SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000, 24: 3130-3139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ware JE, Kosinsky M: Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response. Qual Life Res. 2001, 5: 405-413.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Statistica 10 software Czech version. Web: http://www.statsoft.com
  25. XLSTAT version. 2011, Web: http://www.xlstat.com, software
  26. Rumsfeld JS, Magid DJ, O´Brien M: Changes in health related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001, 72: 2026-2032. 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03213-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Glower D, Christopher T, Milano C, White WD, Smith LR, Jones RH, Sabiston DC: Performance status and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in persons aged 80 to 93 years. Am J Cardiol. 1992, 6: 567-571.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mullany CH, Darling GE, Pluth JR, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Iistrup DM, Gersh BJ: Early and late results after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in 159 patients aged 80 years and older. Circulation. 1990, 82 (Suppl IV): 229-236.Google Scholar
  29. Khan JH, McElhinney DB, Hall TS, Merrick SH: Cardiac valve surgery in octogenarians. Arch Surg. 1998, 8: 887-893.Google Scholar
  30. Le Grand MR, Elliot PC, Murphy BM, Worcester MUC, Higgins RO, Ernest CS, Goble AJ: Health related quality of life trajectories and predictors following coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006, 4: 1-13. 10.1186/1477-7525-4-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dumbor LN, Britchford G, Cale ARJ: The influence of an ageing population on care and clinical resource utilisation in cardiac surgery. Br J Cardiol. 2011, 6: 28-32.Google Scholar
  32. Lee J, Govindan S, Celi LA, Khabbaz KR, Subramaniam B: Cusomized prediction of short length of stay following elective cardiac surgery in elderly patients using a genetic algorithm. World J Cardiovasc Surg. 2013, 3: 163-170. 10.4236/wjcs.2013.35034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Grady KL, Lee R, Subacius H, Malaisrie SC, McGee EC, Kruse J, Goldberger JJ, McCarthy PM: Improvements in healt-related quality of life before and after isolated cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011, 91: 777-783. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gjeilo KH, Wahba A, Klepstad P, Lydersen S, Stenseth R: Health-related quality of life three years after coronary surgery: a comparison with the general population. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006, 1: 29-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kurfirst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.