Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of continuous renal replacement therapy on intestinal mucosal barrier function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a porcine model

  • Changsheng He1, 2,
  • Shuofei Yang1, 3,
  • Wenkui Yu1, 3,
  • Qiyi Chen1, 3,
  • Juanhong Shen1, 3,
  • Yimin Hu3,
  • Jialiang Shi1, 3,
  • Xingjiang Wu1, 3,
  • Jieshou Li1, 3 and
  • Ning Li1, 3Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery20149:72

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-72

Received: 14 November 2013

Accepted: 7 April 2014

Published: 23 April 2014

Abstract

Backgrounds

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been recommended for treatment of acute, potentially reversible, life-threatening respiratory failure unresponsive to conventional therapy. Intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction is one of the most critical pathophysiological disorders during ECMO. This study aimed to determine whether combination with CRRT could alleviate damage of intestinal mucosal barrier function during VV ECMO in a porcine model.

Methods

Twenty-four piglets were randomly divided into control(C), sham(S), ECMO(E) and ECMO + CRRT(EC) group. The animals were treated with ECMO or ECMO + CRRT for 24 hours. After the experiments, piglets were sacrificed. Jejunum, ileum and colon were harvested for morphologic examination of mucosal injury and ultrastructural distortion. Histological scoring was assessed according to Chiu’s scoring standard. Blood samples were taken from the animals at -1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h during experiment. Blood, liver, spleen, kidney and mesenteric lymphnode were collected for bacterial culture. Serum concentrations of diamine oxidase (DAO) and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) were tested as markers to assess intestinal epithelial function and permeability. DAO levels were determined by spectrophotometry and I-FABP levels by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

Microscopy findings showed that ECMO-induced intestinal microvillus shedding and edema, morphological distortion of tight junction between intestinal mucous epithelium and loose cell-cell junctions were significantly improved with combination of CRRT. No significance was detected on positive rate of serum bacterial culture. The elevated colonies of bacterial culture in liver and mesenteric lymphnode in E group reduced significantly in EC group (p < 0.05). Compared with E group, EC group showed significantly decreased level of serum DAO and I-FABP (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

CRRT can alleviate the intestinal mucosal dysfunction and bacterial translocation during VV ECMO, which may extenuate the ECMO-associated SIRS and raise the clinical effect and safety.

Keywords

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Continuous renal replacement treatment (CRRT) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) Intestinal mucosal barrier function

Background

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been considered as an effective means of treatment to unresponsive pulmonary hypertension, respiratory failure, sepsis, and emergency temporary cardiac support for almost 60 years [1, 2]. With superiority for moribund patients, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is recommended to support patients with severe but potentially reversible respiratory failure refractory to conventional therapy [36]. The encouraging results in the CESAR trial and remarkable effect of ECMO in 2009 H1N1 and 2013 H7N9 pandemichas brought it into the spotlight worldwide [710]. However, direct circulation of blood across synthetic surfaces escalates a pro-inflammatory response, further exacerbating a disease process that is already associated with the activation of the inflammatory cascade [11]. With much wider range of use, concerns remain about the near-universal occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) during ECMO associated with considerable morbidity [1217]. Intestine is the central part of systemic SIRS and a motor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [18]. Rapid rise of plasma concentrations of inflammatory cytokines during ECMO-related SIRS is due to the release of pre-formed stores in the intestine [19]. Breakdown of mucosal barrier during ECMO increases intestinal permeability and allows translocation of intraluminal bacteria across the mucosa leading to distant organ injury [15]. Strategies to protect gut barrier function and thereby prevent bacterial translocation during ECMO merit comprehensive and further explorations.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) shows remarkable advantages in eliminating inflammatory mediators, dampening inflammatory response, preserving organ function and maintaining optimal fluid status during ECMO with well clinical tolerance in a hemodynamically unstable condition [2022]. ECMO-associated organ lesion of myocardium and kidney was proven to be extenuated with CRRT [23]. As far as we know, this is the first study designed to investigate whether CRRT could alleviate the gut mucosal dysfunction and intestinal epithelial barrier loss in a swine model so as to provide an approach to improve the clinical effect and relieve the risk of VV ECMO therapy.

Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jingling Hospital in Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. Experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines on the use of laboratory animals.

Experimental protocol

The 24 piglets weight of 27.46 ± 4.45 Kg (25-32 Kg) of either sex were randomly allocated to 4 groups: control group (C group), sham group (S group, to verify whether the required ECMO operative procedure affected the results), VV-ECMO group (E group), VV-ECMO combined with CRRT group (EC group). All piglets were fasted for 24 h before experiments. Each animal received lactated Ringer’s solution at a rate of 3 mL*kg−1*h−1 and bolus fluid was provided as required to maintain MAP above 60 mmHg. Temperature, serum pH, glucose, and ionized calcium concentration were monitored and maintained normally. All animals were monitored for 24 h. After heparin (150 U/kg IV) was given as a bolus to the sham, ECMO and ECMO + CRRT groups, placement of cannula was performed and confirmed by ultrasonograph. The control group got no operation and treatment. In sham group, the vascular venous cannula was occluded at 0 hour. In ECMO group, ECMO was instituted with cannulae insertion. In ECMO + CRRT group, ECMO and CRRT were initiated at the same time upon cannulae insertion. The blood and tissue samples were collected 1 h before and 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after experiment. At the end of experiments, piglets were euthanized with a bolus injection of potassium chloride (40 mL, 0.1 g/mL).

Surgical procedure

Anesthesia was induced with ketamine (20 mg/kg), diazepam (8 mg/kg), and atropine (0.1 mg/kg) intramuscularly and then maintained with ketamine (10–20 mg*kg−1*h−1) and diazepam (8 mg*kg−1*h−1) intravenously. The animals were intubated through a cervical tracheotomy and then mechanical ventilation (TBird VELA, USA) was established using volume-controlled mode with FiO2 of 21% and a positive end-expiratory pressure set at 5 mmHg throughout the experimental period. Tidal volumes were adjusted to 5-8 mL/kg. Respiratory rate was set at 15/min. Internal jugular vein and femoral vein catheters were placed for intravenous access, sample collection and connected to a medical monitor (Model90207, Spacelabs, USA).

VV-ECMO proceduce

After a 150 U/kg intravenous bolus of heparin, ECMO cannulae (15-Fr, Medtronic, USA) were placed in the superior vena cava through the internal jugular vein and inferior vena cava through the femoral vein. Placement of cannulae was confirmed under guidance of ultrasonograph. Heparin was continuously infused to keep the activated clotting time (ACT) at 180 to 220 s during the process of ECMO. The ECMO system consisted of a membrane oxygenator and tubing (Quadrox PLS, Maquet, Germany), a centrifugal pump (Rotaflow Console, Maquet, Germany), and a heat exchange maintaining temperature at 37°C (Heater–Cooler Unit HCU 30, Maquet, Germany). The circuit was primed with 500 mL hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and 200-300 mL Ringer’s lactate. Blood in circuit was drained from the femoral vein cannulae and infused into the internal jugular vein cannulae at a flow rate of 50 mL*kg−1*min−1. Sweep gas was 100% oxygen at a flow rate equal to the blood flow rate.

CRRT setting

CRRT was performed in a pre-dilution mode using a polysulfone membrane (1.4 m2 AV 600 s, ultraflux, Germany) connected to a continuous blood pump (Baxter BM 25, Baxter SAN Germany). CRRT was performed with zero-balanced continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) at a blood flow of 160-180 mL/min and an ultrafiltration rate of 35 mL*kg−1*h−1. A lactate-buffered replacement fluid (deploy Jingling prescription, China) was administered in a post-dilutional fashion.

Connecting manner

The inlet (arterial) line of the CRRT circuit was connected after oxygenator by a three-way tap and the outlet (venous) line was connected to the circuit at another tap on infusing cannula. The filters were unchanged during 24 hours each time.

Histopathological examination

  1. 1.

    Histology examination and score

    Tissue samples from the jejunum, ileum and colon were fixed and dehydrated with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, cutted into sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E staining), and observed in 100-times by an optical microscopy (CX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Four distinct sections of each sample are observed and scored according to Chiu’s scoring standard by two independent pathologist blinded to the grouping [24].

     
  2. 2.

    Ultrastructure detection

    Fresh intestinal tissues from the jejunum, ileum and colon were flushed with phosphate-buffered saline, cut into pieces (1*1*1 mm), fixed with 2.5% cold glutaraldehyde for 2 h, flushed with phosphate-buffered saline again, fixed with 1% perosmic acid, and dehydrated with acetone. Ultrathin sections were placed on 200-mesh copper grids and double stained with 4% uranyl acetate and 0.2% lead citrate. Sections were examined under transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-1200, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Ultrastructure of tight junction was observed in 10,000-times magnification. The histology and ultrastructure were examined by two independent pathologist blinded to the grouping.

     

Measurement of intestinal barrier function

  1. 1.

    Bacterial translocation

     
  2. a)

    Blood bacterial culture: blood samples were placed in agarose-gel plates to aerobic and anaerobic bacterial culture for 24 h for bacterial identification.

     
  3. b)

    Tissue bacterial culture: after animals were euthanized, the liver, spleen, kidney and mesenteric lymphnode were collected by stringent aseptic operation for tissue bacterial culture at 37°C for 24 h (measured by clonal formation unit/gram, CFU/g).

     
  4. 2.

    Concentrations of Diamine Oxidase (DAO) and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP)

     

Concentrations of DAO and I-FABP were used as the markers for the assessment of intestinal epithelial function. Serum and filtrate DAO levels were determined using a spectrophotometry kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute,China). Serum and filtrate I-FABP level were tested by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Wuhan EIAab Science Co., Ltd, China). Spectrophotometry and ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were defined as means ± standard deviation if they were normally distributed,Colonies of tissue bacterial culture were computed by log10. Comparisons between groups for pathological score, colonies of tissue bacterial culture, DAO and I-FABP levels in filtrate were performed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In case of statistical significance, post hoc comparisons were made by unpaired samples t-test. Fisher’s exact test was used in blood culture positive rate. Repeated-measures ANOVA were used to analyze DAO and I-FABP variables over time between four groups followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc testing. Statistical comparisons among the groups were performed using two-way ANOVA, followed by unpaired t-tests with Bonferroni’s correction. Statistical significance was accepted for a P-value of 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical package (version17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

No significant differences were detected in body weight and other characteristics among groups.

Histology and ultrastructure examination

In histology examination, jejunal and ileal mucosa was normal in C group. Jejunal and ileal mucosal structure distortion, villous collapse and edema, and epithelial shedding were observed in S and E groups. These damages were attenuated in EC group with slight mucosal injury and villi shedding (Figure 1A-H). Normal morphology of colonic mucosa was demolished in E group and slight structural disorder with epithelial atrophy was found in S group. Mucosal damages were relieved back to smooth and integral in EC group similar to C group (Figure 1I-L). Significant difference of pathologic scores was detected among four groups (P < 0.01). Socres of S and E group were markedly higher than C group, disclosing the impairment on intestinal mucosa by invasive manipulation and ECMO therapy (P < 0.01). Score was slightly elevated in E group when compared with S group. Score of EC group was significantly lower than S and E group, but higher than C group (P < 0.01). It revealed that CRRT could alleviate the ECMO-related morphological distortion of intestial mucosa (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Histology examination of jejunal, ileal and colonic mucosa with H and E staining under optical microscopy (magnification*100). A-D: jejunal mucosa of C, S, E, EC group; E-H: ileal mucosa of C, S, E, EC group; I-L: colonic mucosa of C, S, E, EC group. Normal mucosa was viewed in C group. Mucosal structure distortion, villous collapse and edema, and epithelial shedding were observed in S and E groups. These damages were significantly attenuated in EC group.

Figure 2

Pathological score of jejunal, ileal and colonic mucosa injury. Socres of S and E group were markedly higher than C group (P < 0.01). Score of EC group was significantly lower than S and E group, but higher than C group (P < 0.01). (Compared to control group, *P < 0.01, P < 0.05; compared to S group, P < 0.01; compared to E group, #P < 0.01).

Under TEM, almost the same in jejunum, ileum and colon, structural integrity and solid connection of epithelial tight junction and desmosome with smooth microvillus were indicated in C group. Loose epithelial tight junction and sparse villi were found in S group. The morphological distortion of tight junction between intestinal mucous epithelium became blurred with loose cell-cell gaps, disappearance of desmosomes and mitochondrial swelling in E group. All damages were significantly improved in EC group with solid epithelial tight junction, dense desmosome and tidy villi (Figure 3A-H, J-M). Bacterial invasion into ileal mucosa was clearly observed suggesting a significant increase of intestinal mucosal barrier permeability (Figure 3I).
Figure 3

Ultrastructural detection of jejunal, ileal and colonic mucosa under transmission electron microscopy (magnification*10,000). A-D: jejunal mucosa of C, S, E, EC group; E-H: ileal mucosa of C, S, E, EC group; I: bacterial invasion into ileal mucosa; J-M: colonic mucosa of C, S, E, EC group. The morphological distortion of tight junction between intestinal mucous epithelium became blurred with loose cell-cell gaps, disappearance of desmosomes and mitochondrial swelling in E group were significantly improved in EC group.

Bacterial translocation

Blood bacterial culture was negative in all groups. At 24 h after experiment, positive rate of blood bacterial culture was highest in E group (33.33%), lower in S and EC group (16.67%) and none in C group. No statistical difference was detected by Fisher’s exact test (Table 1). There was significant difference in bacterial culture of liver and mesenteric lymphnode among four groups (P < 0.05), but none in kidney and spleen (P > 0.05). VV ECMO therapy (E group) induced a significant increase of colonies of liver and mesenteric lymphnode bacterial culture than C group (P < 0.01) which was attenuated significantly in liver (P < 0.01) and partially in mesenteric lymphnode after combination with CRRT therapy (EC group). Colonies of mesenteric lymphnode bacterial culture rose notably in E group (vs S group, P < 0.05) and EC group (vs C group, P < 0.01). Colonies of liver bacterial culture increased mildly in E group (vs S group, P = 0.06) and EC group (vs C group, P = 0.15) (Figure 4).
Table 1

Serum bacterial culture

Group

Before experiment (%)

24 h after experiment (%)

Control

0/6 (0)

0/6 (0)

Sham

0/6 (0)

1/6 (16.66)

ECMO

0/6 (0)

2/6 (33.33)

EC + CR

0/6 (0)

1/6 (16.66)

Figure 4

Colonies of bacterial culture in liver, spleen, kidney and mesenteric lymphnode. VV ECMO therapy (E group) induced a significant increase of colonies of bacterial culture in liver and mesenteric lymphnode than C group (P < 0.01), which was attenuated significantly in liver (P < 0.01) and partially in mesenteric lymphnode after combination with CRRT therapy (EC group). (Compared to control group, *P < 0.01; compared to S group, P < 0.05; compared to E group, #P < 0.05).

Injury of intestinal epithelial barrier

Serum DAO and I-FABP levels did not change over time significantly among 4 groups (P > 0.05). But they differed significantly between groups at the same time point (P < 0.05). Compared with constant low level in C group, S and E group demonstrated notable increase of serum DAO and I-FABP level (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). In EC group, despite initial high level, after 2 h of CRRT serum DAO and I-FABP levels decreased gradually to same level as C group at 24 h, significantly lower than E group (P < 0.01) (Figures 5 and 6). The filtrate DAO and I-FABP levels remained relatively constant throughout the study period, which demonstrated that decreased serum DAO and I-FABP levels in EC group was not due to clearance of CRRT (Figure 7A, B). All the results suggested that the VV ECMO-induced intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction could be relieved notably with combination of CRRT.
Figure 5

Serum DAO levels in 4 groups. Serum DAO levels did not change significantly over time (P > 0.05). Compared with notable increase of serum DAO level in E group, it was significantly lower after CRRT for 12 h (P < 0.01). (Compared to control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; compared to S group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01; compared to E group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01).

Figure 6

Serum I-FABP levels in 4 groups. Serum I-FABP levels did not change significantly over time (P > 0.05). Compared with high serum I-FABP level in E group, it showed significant decrease after CRRT for 12 h (P < 0.05). (Compared to control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; compared to S group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01; compared to E group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01).

Figure 7

Filtrate DAO and I-FABP level over time. A: Filtrate DAO and I-FABP level over time; B: Filtrate DAO and I-FABP level over time. The filtrate DAO and I-FABP level remained relatively constant throughout the experiment period. (Compared to -1 h, *P < 0.05).

Discussion

To date, our findings are the first in vivo animal experiment in an VV ECMO model to demonstrate the protective effect of CRRT on intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction secondary to ECMO-induced SIRS. During ECMO, huge disparity between the patient’s circulating blood volume and circuit volumes, often 200–300% greater than patient’s circulating blood volume, increases the activation of various blood components upon long exposure to the artificial material surface of the ECMO circuit leading to changes of blood constituent and SIRS [15, 25]. This inflammatory response usually manifests within the first few hours of ECMO with hypotension, decreased urine output and lung compliance, anasarca and liver dysfunction [26]. These changes often persist for several days with delayed recovery and prolonged ECMO therapy. A reciprocal causation is found between intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction and inflammatory cytokine storm. Rapid rise of inflammatory cytokines during ECMO-related SIRS was due to the release of pre-formed stores in the intestine [19]. On the other side, loss of intestinal epithelial barrier secondary to ECMO-indeced SIRS has been demonstrated in previous study and similar changes were detected in this study as well [15]. In the present study, bacterial translocation was detected after the initiation of ECMO. Similarly, Hirthler et al. [27] found increased plasma LPS levels in neonates after initiation of ECMO for 36 h. Bacterial translocation due to the increase of gut mucosal permeability in human neonates receiving ECMO has also been noted by Piena et al. [28]. Bacterial products play an important role in initiating and amplifying all the major inflammatory pathways involved in ECMO-related SIRS [29]. Since the early development of intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction and bacterial translocation on initiation of ECMO, it is more likely that intestinal epithelial barrier injury acts as a primary initiator or amplifier of ECMO-related SIRS rather than an epiphenomenon reflecting loss of mucosal integrity.

Concentrations of DAO and I-FABP were used as quantitative method to assess the intestinal epithelial function in this study. DAO is a kind of highly-active enzyme weight of 250 kD existed only in intestinal epithelium. About 95% of DAO locates in the intestinal villi of human and other mammals. It will transfer into peripheral blood in a stable state upon intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction. I-FABP is low-molecular-weight protein specifically located in epithelial cells of small bowel mucosa which is rapidly released into the circulation after injury of intestinal mucosal barrier due to mesenteric ischemia and bowel necrosis [30]. DAO and I-FABP are excellent early marker for evaluating the severity of acute intestinal mucosa injury [31]. In 2004, Nobuo Tsunooka et al. [32] evaluated bacterial translocation secondary to small intestinal mucosal ischemia during cardiopulmonary bypass by serum level of DAO and peptidoglycan. DAO was used as an index of beneficial effect of continuous blood purification (CBP) on gut barrier dysfunction in another study [33]. In our study, after 2 h of CRRT, the intestine mucosal dysfunction indicated by significantly elevated serum level of DAO and I-FABP in E group declined and returned to almost the same level with C group at 24 h. Since the DAO and I-FABP level in filtrate did not elevate as CRRT continued, perhaps reaching a saturation limit, decrease of serum DAO and I-FABP level were due to improvement of intestine mucosal function instead of the clean-up effect.

Because of the inherent characteristics of ECMO circuit to activate inflammatory pathways, elucidation of inflammatory pathways by CRRT is a critical step in the development of effective strategy to ECMO-related SIRS [34]. But the definitive mechanism of the protective effects of CRRT to ECMO-induced injury of intestinal epithelial barrier is not yet clear. Intestinal mucosal edema with epithelial swelling, cell-cell gap expanding, tight junction and desmosome loosening was clearly observed during ECMO. Optimal fluid status maintained by CRRT can effectively reduce the high permeability secondary to intestinal mucosal edema. Additionally, direct cytotoxic effects of massive inflammatory cells or cytokines and their role in the development of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial dysfunction may be another main reason for ECMO-associated intestinal epithelial barrier injury [23]. CRRT operates with the ability of inflammatory mediator elimination via several ways, including absorption, diffusion, and convection, dampening inflammatory response to preserve organ function [35, 36]. Moreover, CRRT could ameliorate the gut barrier dysfunction by way of attenuating breakdown and reorganization of tight junction protein, such as occludin and zonula occludens-1, with increase of the inflammation-induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA levels and nitric oxide (NO) production which are implicated as factors contributing to cytoskeletal instability and injury [33, 37]. Phosphodiesterase inhibition is another possible mechanism of CRRT-mediated attenuation of gut barrier injury [38, 39]. Further studies are warrented to identify specific mediators and pathways of the protective effects of CRRT on intestinal epithelial barrier during ECMO.

A high prevalence of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy in patients treated with ECMO has been observed [40, 41]. Expanding CRRT to non-renal indications, such as cardopulmonary bypass and sepsis, based on elimination of inflammatory mediators has been suggested [42]. Our study provides an additional evidence to initiate CRRT during VV ECMO before renal dysfunction. However, there are some underlying matters and limitations of this study. Similar to other studies, our experimental timeline spanned only 24 h and may limit its applicability in clinical practice where ECMO therapy lasts for days to weeks. The effect of longterm consequences of this strategy on enterogenic infection, general intestinal function, hemodynamic alteration and oxygen utilization warrant further study. The differences between patient populations (human vs. porcine) as well as the influence of underlying disease processes or pathological factors on intestinal mucosal barrier function are suspected in respect that health animals were used in this study.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of our study indicated that damage of intestinal mucosal barrier function with loss of epithelial tight junction leading to bacterial translocation is induced during VV ECMO therapy. The combined use of VV ECMO and CRRT can alleviate levels of intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction and related bacterial translocation, which may extenuate the ECMO-associated SIRS and raise the effect and safety of VV ECMO.

Authors’ information

Changsheng He, Shuofei Yang and Wenkui Yu are the co-first authors.

Notes

Abbreviations

ECMO: 

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

CRRT: 

Continuous renal replacement therapies

VV ECMO: 

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

DAO: 

Diamine oxidase

I-FABP: 

Fatty acid binding protein

MODS: 

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

ACT: 

Activated clotting time

CBP: 

Continuous blood purification

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

iNOS: 

Induced nitric oxide synthase

NO: 

Nitric oxide

SIRS: 

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Qiurong Li and Shifeng Yu for their help in measurement of indices and sample collection. This study was supported by 12th five-year Major Program of Army Grants (NO. AWS11J03; NO. AWS12J001); Jiangsu Province’s Special Project of Science and Techonology in Medicine (BL2012006); Jiangsu Province’s Key Medical Talent Program (RC2011128).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Surgery, Jinling hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University
(2)
Clinical School of Second Military Medical University
(3)
Clinical School of Nanjing University

References

  1. MacLaren G, Combes A, Bartlett RH: Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: life support in the new era. Intensive Care Med. 2012, 38 (2): 210-220. 10.1007/s00134-011-2439-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fortenberry JD, Paden ML: Extracorporeal therapies in the treatment of sepsis: experience and promise. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006, 17 (2): 72-79. 10.1053/j.spid.2006.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chalwin RP, Moran JL, Graham PL: The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of the adult respiratory distress syndrome: review and quantitative analysis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008, 36 (2): 152-161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schmid C, Philipp A, Hilker M, Rupprecht L, Arlt M, Keyser A, Lubnow M, Muller T: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute lung failure in adults. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012, 31 (1): 9-15. 10.1016/j.healun.2011.07.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nehra D, Goldstein AM, Doody DP, Ryan DP, Chang Y, Masiakos PT: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for nonneonatal acute respiratory failure: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience from 1990 to 2008. Arch Surg. 2009, 144 (5): 427-432. 10.1001/archsurg.2009.45. discussion 432View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brogan TV, Thiagarajan RR, Rycus PT, Bartlett RH, Bratton SL: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with severe respiratory failure: a multi-center database. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 35 (12): 2105-2114. 10.1007/s00134-009-1661-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, Hibbert CL, Truesdale A, Clemens F, Cooper N, Firmin RK, Elbourne D, collaboration Ct: Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009, 374 (9698): 1351-1363. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61069-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, Beca J, Bellomo R, Blackwell N, Forrest P, Gattas D, Granger E, Herkes R, Jackson A, McGuinness S, Nair P, Pellegrino V, Pettila V, Plunkett B, Pye R, Torzillo P, Webb S, Wilson M, Ziegenfuss M, Australia, New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Influenza I: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2009, 30 (17): 1888-1895.Google Scholar
  9. Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R, Cook DJ, Marshall J, Lacroix J, Stelfox T, Bagshaw S, Choong K, Lamontagne F, Turgeon AF, Lapinsky S, Ahern SP, Smith O, Siddiqui F, Jouvet P, Khwaja K, McIntyre L, Menon K, Hutchison J, Hornstein D, Joffe A, Lauzier F, Singh J, Karachi T, Wiebe K, Olafson K, Ramsey C, Sharma S, Dodek P: Canadian Critical Care Trials Group HNC. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA. 2009, 302 (17): 1872-1879. 10.1001/jama.2009.1496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Y, Lu S, Song Z, Wang W, Hao P, Li J, Zhang X, Yen HL, Shi B, Li T, Guan W, Xu L, Liu Y, Wang S, Zhang X, Tian D, Zhu Z, He J, Huang K, Chen H, Zheng L, Li X, Ping J, Kang B, Xi X, Zha L, Li Y, Zhang Z, Peiris M, Yuan Z: Association between adverse clinical outcome in human disease caused by novel influenza A H7N9 virus and sustained viral shedding and emergence of antiviral resistance. Lancet. 2013, 381 (9885): 2273-2279. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61125-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mildner RJ, Taub N, Vyas JR, Killer HM, Firmin RK, Field DJ, Kotecha S: Cytokine imbalance in infants receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure. Biol Neonate. 2005, 88 (4): 321-327. 10.1159/000087630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Q, Yu W, Shi J, Shen J, Hu Y, Gao T, Zhang J, Xi F, Gong J, Li J, Li N: The effect of venovenous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy on immune inflammatory response of cerebral tissues in porcine model. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013, 8 (1): 186-10.1186/1749-8090-8-186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Shen J, Yu W, Shi J, Chen Q, Hu Y, Zhang J, Gao T, Xi F, Gong J, He C, Li N, Li J: Effect of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on the heart in a healthy piglet model. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013, 8 (1): 163-10.1186/1749-8090-8-163.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Yimin H, Wenkui Y, Jialiang S, Qiyi C, Juanhong S, Zhiliang L, Changsheng H, Ning L, Jieshou L: Effects of continuous renal replacement therapy on renal inflammatory cytokines during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a porcine model. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013, 8 (1): 113-10.1186/1749-8090-8-113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurundkar AR, Killingsworth CR, McIlwain RB, Timpa JG, Hartman YE, He D, Karnatak RK, Neel ML, Clancy JP, Anantharamaiah GM, Maheshwari A: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation causes loss of intestinal epithelial barrier in the newborn piglet. Pediatr Res. 2010, 68 (2): 128-133. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181e4c9f8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Adrian K, Mellgren K, Skogby M, Friberg LG, Mellgren G, Wadenvik H: Cytokine release during long-term extracorporeal circulation in an experimental model. Artif Organs. 1998, 22 (10): 859-863. 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1998.06121.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fortenberry JD, Bhardwaj V, Niemer P, Cornish JD, Wright JA, Bland L: Neutrophil and cytokine activation with neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 1996, 128 (5 Pt 1): 670-678.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Leaphart CL, Tepas JJ: The gut is a motor of organ system dysfunction. Surgery. 2007, 141 (5): 563-569. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.01.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mc IRB, Timpa JG, Kurundkar AR, Holt DW, Kelly DR, Hartman YE, Neel ML, Karnatak RK, Schelonka RL, Anantharamaiah GM, Killingsworth CR, Maheshwari A: Plasma concentrations of inflammatory cytokines rise rapidly during ECMO-related SIRS due to the release of preformed stores in the intestine. Lab Invest. 2010, 90 (1): 128-139. 10.1038/labinvest.2009.119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Skogby M, Adrian K, Friberg LG, Mellgren G, Mellgren K: Influence of hemofiltration on plasma cytokine levels and platelet activation during extra corporeal membrane oxygenation. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2000, 34 (3): 315-320. 10.1080/713783129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mu TS, Palmer EG, Batts SG, Lentz-Kapua SL, Uyehara-Lock JH, Uyehara CF: Continuous renal replacement therapy to reduce inflammation in a piglet hemorrhage-reperfusion extracorporeal membrane oxygenation model. Pediatr Res. 2012, 72 (3): 249-255. 10.1038/pr.2012.69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsuda K, Hirasawa H, Oda S, Shiga H, Nakanishi K: Current topics on cytokine removal technologies. Ther Apher. 2001, 5 (4): 306-314. 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2001.00361.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen J, Yu W, Chen Q, Shi J, Hu Y, Zhang J, Gao T, Xi F, He C, Gong J, Li N, Li J: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) Attenuates Myocardial Inflammation and Mitochondrial Injury Induced by Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) in a Healthy Piglet Model. Inflammation. 2013, 36 (5): 1186-1193. 10.1007/s10753-013-9654-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chiu CJ, McArdle AH, Brown R, Scott HJ, Gurd FN: Intestinal mucosal lesion in low-flow states. I. A morphological, hemodynamic, and metabolic reappraisal. Arch Surg. 1970, 101 (4): 478-483. 10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340280030009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ko WJ, Lin CY, Chen RJ, Wang SS, Lin FY, Chen YS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for adult postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002, 73 (2): 538-545. 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03330-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmid C, Philipp A, Mueller T, Hilker M: Extracorporeal life support - systems, indications, and limitations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009, 57 (8): 449-454. 10.1055/s-0029-1186149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirthler M, Simoni J, Dickson M: Elevated levels of endotoxin, oxygen-derived free radicals, and cytokines during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 1992, 27 (9): 1199-1202. 10.1016/0022-3468(92)90787-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Piena M, Albers MJ, Van Haard PM, Gischler S, Tibboel D: Introduction of enteral feeding in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after evaluation of intestinal permeability changes. J Pediatr Surg. 1998, 33 (1): 30-34. 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90355-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gatt M, Reddy BS, MacFie J: Review article: bacterial translocation in the critically ill–evidence and methods of prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 25 (7): 741-757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Funaoka H, Kanda T, Kajiura S, Ohkaru Y, Fujii H: Development of a high-specificity sandwich ELISA system for the quantification of human intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) concentrations. Immunol Invest. 2011, 40 (3): 223-242. 10.3109/08820139.2010.534216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Laws EG, Freeman DE: Effects of heparin, venous strangulation obstruction of the small intestine, and reperfusion of the small intestine on plasma diamine oxidase activity in horses. Am J Vet Res. 1994, 55 (2): 185-191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsunooka N, Maeyama K, Hamada Y, Imagawa H, Takano S, Watanabe Y, Kawachi K: Bacterial translocation secondary to small intestinal mucosal ischemia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Measurement by diamine oxidase and peptidoglycan. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004, 25 (2): 275-280. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.11.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang JB, Du XG, Zhang H, Li ML, Xiao G, Wu J, Gan H: Breakdown of the gut barrier in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is attenuated by continuous blood purification: effects on tight junction structural proteins. Int J Artif Organs. 2010, 33 (1): 5-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hennessy VL, Hicks RE, Niewiarowski S, Edmunds LH, Colman RW: Function of human platelets during extracorporeal circulation. Am J Physiol. 1977, 232 (6): H622-H628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Oda S, Sadahiro T, Hirayama Y, Nakamura M, Watanabe E, Tateishi Y, Hirasawa H: Non-renal indications for continuous renal replacement therapy: current status in Japan. Contrib Nephrol. 2010, 166: 47-53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. De Vriese AS, Vanholder RC, Pascual M, Lameire NH, Colardyn FA: Can inflammatory cytokines be removed efficiently by continuous renal replacement therapies?. Intensive Care Med. 1999, 25 (9): 903-910. 10.1007/s001340050981.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Banan A, Fields JZ, Zhang Y, Keshavarzian A: iNOS upregulation mediates oxidant-induced disruption of F-actin and barrier of intestinal monolayers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001, 280 (6): G1234-G1246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Costantini TW, Loomis WH, Putnam JG, Drusinsky D, Deree J, Choi S, Wolf P, Baird A, Eliceiri B, Bansal V, Coimbra R: Burn-induced gut barrier injury is attenuated by phosphodiesterase inhibition: effects on tight junction structural proteins. Shock. 2009, 31 (4): 416-422. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181863080.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Costantini TW, Deree J, Loomis W, Putnam JG, Choi S, Baird A, Eliceiri BP, Bansal V, Coimbra R: Phosphodiesterase inhibition attenuates alterations to the tight junction proteins occludin and ZO-1 in immunostimulated Caco-2 intestinal monolayers. Life Sci. 2009, 84 (1–2): 18-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Askenazi DJ, Selewski DT, Paden ML, Cooper DS, Bridges BC, Zappitelli M, Fleming GM: Renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012, 7 (8): 1328-1336. 10.2215/CJN.12731211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith AH, Hardison DC, Worden CR, Fleming GM, Taylor MB: Acute renal failure during extracorporeal support in the pediatric cardiac patient. ASAIO J. 2009, 55 (4): 412-416. 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31819ca3d0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirasawa H: Indications for blood purification in critical care. Contrib Nephrol. 2010, 166: 21-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© He et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.