Biomechanical analysis of wrapping of the moderately dilated ascending aorta
© Plonek et al. 2015
Received: 23 March 2015
Accepted: 19 June 2015
Published: 1 August 2015
External wrapping is a surgical method performed to prevent the dilatation of the aorta and to decrease the risk of its dissection and rupture. However, it is also believed to cause degeneration of the aortic wall. A biomechanical analysis was thus performed to assess the stress of the aortic wall subjected to external wrapping.
A stress analysis using the finite elements method was carried out on three models: a non-dilated aorta, a moderately dilated aorta and a wrapped aorta. The models were subjected to a pulsatile flow (120/80 mmHg) and a systolic aortic annulus motion of 11 mm.
The finite elements analysis showed that the stress exerted on the outer surface of the ascending aorta in the wrapping model (0.05–0.8 MPa) was similar to that observed in the normal aorta (0.03–0.7 MPa) and was lower than in the model of a moderately dilated aorta (0.06–1.4 MPa). The stress on the inner surface of the ascending aorta ranged from 0.2 MPa to 0.4 MPa in the model of the normal aorta, from 0.3 to 1.3 MPa in the model of the dilated aorta and from 0.05 MPa to 0.4 MPa in the wrapping model.
The results of this study suggest that the aortic wall is subjected to similar stress following a wrapping procedure to the one present in the normal aorta.
KeywordsAneurysm Aorta Wrapping
The dilatation of the tubular part of the ascending aorta is often diagnosed in patients with aortic valve pathology. Some surgeons prefer the ”watch and wait” approach to a moderately dilated aorta accompanying aortic valve disease. However, this approach carries the risk of a reoperation in case of further aortic dilatation. Thus, most cardiac surgeons choose to replace the dilated tubular part of the ascending aorta or perform other surgical procedures like aortoplasty or wrapping.
There is some concern that placing an external corset which decreases the size of the dilated fragment of the aorta may increase the stress in the aortic wall and lead to a degeneration resembling the process observed in decubitus.
One way of verifying whether a decrease in the diameter of a moderately dilated ascending aorta with an external corset causes any stress increase in the aortic wall is a biomechanical analysis using the finite elements method. This is a computational method, which demonstrates an approximation of the exerted stress that can occur given the necessary entry data of the object and its surroundings (force, movement, material, shape).
The aim of this study was to assess the stress distribution in the aortic wall following a wrapping procedure. A biomechanical analysis comparing wrapping with a dilated and nondilated aorta using the finite elements method was performed.
Finite elements models
Three computational models were created for further analysis – models of the normal aorta and a moderately dilated aorta with and without wrapping. The mechanical properties of the aortic wall were established according to data available from other biomechanical studies [12–14]. Young’s modulus for the aortic wall was 6 MPa and Poisson’s ratio was 0.49. Afterwards, discrete models (divided into finite elements) were created and a sensitivity study of the finite elements’ mesh was carried out. Hexahedral finite elements were chosen for the discretization with a quadratic shape function. The discrete model of aortic wrapping is shown in Fig. 1.
In this study, the stress distribution on the outer and inner surface of the aorta was analyzed. It was assumed that the stress distribution on the inner surface might correlate with the potential risk of aortic dissection.
Boundary conditions (arterial pressure, aortic annulus dislocation) were identical in all the simulations. The dimensions of the analyzed models were the only variables. The simulations were carried out using Ansys software (Ansys, Inc.).
The highest values of stress in the aortic wall were observed at the end of the systole, when arterial pressure was at its peak and the heart muscle was completely contracted and maximally pulled the aortic annulus. All stress values presented in this study were recorded during the above mentioned phase of the heart cycle.
Aortic wrapping is considered to be a controversial surgical method. To date, the results of wrapping with and without concomitant aortoplasty have been promising [9, 15, 16, 10, 17–20, 3, 21–23, 5, 24, 25, 6, 7, 26, 8]. There are no papers, which report increased mortality and morbidity in patients after a wrapping procedure compared to those after a supracoronary graft operation. This surgical technique has the advantage of a shorter aortic cross clamping time, and thus, a potentially lower risk of intraoperative ischemic damage of the myocardium [18, 26, 15] However, there have been documented cases of complications after this procedure [9–11, 27]. The main concern among the adversaries of wrapping is that it may cause the degeneration of the wrapped portion of the aortic wall.
During an isolated wrapping procedure, the diameter of the vessel is decreased without excising its wall. Based on our observations, there are no “wrinkles” or plications of the aortic wall after an isolated wrapping procedure of a moderately dilated aorta. This could result from the residual elasticity of the moderately dilated aorta, which may return to its normal diameter when an external scaffold is applied. One possible explanation is that the arterial pressure pushes the aortic wall against the external scaffold and prevents it from being plicated.
To assess the potential unfavorable biomechanical characteristics of the aorta subjected to a wrapping procedure, the analysis of stress distribution in the aortic wall is needed. Such an analysis should then be compared to the values observed in a “healthy aorta”. One of the best methods of defining the stress distribution is a finite elements analysis (FEA). It involves dividing an analyzed object into numerous smaller elements and carrying out mechanical analyses of the model. The results are an approximation of the phenomena that may occur in the real object. This method is primarily used for engineering purposes. It allows the assessment of the distribution of stress and strain and the investigation of the critical regions within an analyzed object. The finite elements analysis has already been used in cardiovascular medicine [11–19] but there are no studies of stress analyses of the wrapping of the ascending aorta. In our simulations, the highest values of stress in all the analyzed models were observed around the attachments of the main branches of the aortic arch. The branches of the aortic arch had to be virtually suspended (Fig. 3). This implicated the highest stress in the angles between the surface of the aortic arch and its branches. In this study, the results from this area were not analyzed as they were clinically less relevant than the stress analysis in the aortic root and the tubular part of the ascending aorta.
The values of stress on the inner and outer surfaces of the aorta in the model of external wrapping were comparable to the values observed in the normal aorta. Moreover, the values of stress on the inner surface of the wrapped portion of the aorta were even lower than in the nondilated aorta. This means that from a biomechanical point of view, the inner surface of the wrapped aorta is subjected to lower stress than an unwrapped aorta and should be less likely to dissect.
According to the recent data, the aorta mainly dissects before reaching the threshold diameter, which qualifies it for replacement . Thus, a safe and reproducible method of dealing with a moderately dilated aorta would be very useful. Our results suggest that, from a biomechanical point of view, external wrapping may be a reasonable surgical option for dealing with a moderately dilated aorta. However, based on certain case reports, external load caused by the external wrap may cause aortic wall rarefaction and degeneration. Doyle et al. presented a case of a reoperation after aortic valve replacement with a concomitant wrapping procedure due to prosthetic valve dysfunction. The authors observed a rarefaction of the aorta under the Dacron prosthesis with spots where the vascular prosthesis completely replaced the aorta . The patient did not require replacement of the wrapped portion of the aorta as there were no signs of aortic dissection, and the surgeon did not encounter problems when closing the aortotomy. The other possible complication of external wrapping can occur following an improper placement of the external wrap (a vascular prosthesis that is too short or lack of anchoring sutures), which may lead to the dislocation of the prosthesis and subsequent aortic redilatation.
External wrapping of the moderately dilated aorta may be a useful procedure accompanying the aortic valve procedure. However, one should be aware of the possible complications associated with this technique. An improper placement of the prosthesis may cause wrap dislocation and aortic redilatation. Aortic wall degeneration has also been observed in several patients, but it did not lead to aortic dissection in any of the patients.
Due to technical limitations, the aortic annulus up-and-down motion was simulated without the additional twist that is observed during systole. The simulations were performed on simplified, theoretical models.
The results of this study suggest that after a wrapping procedure, the aortic wall is subjected to similar stress that occurs in the normal aorta and lower stress than in the nonwrapped, moderately dilated aorta. From a biomechanical point of view, the wrapped aorta is less likely to dissect than a dilated aorta.
- Robicsek F, Daugherty HK, Mullen DC, Harbold Jr NB, Hall DG, Jackson RD, et al. Long-range observations with external aortic grafts. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1976;17(3):195–201.Google Scholar
- Gill M, Dunning J. Is reduction aortoplasty (with or without external wrap) an acceptable alternative to replacement of the dilated ascending aorta? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(4):693–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen O, Odim J, De la Zerda D, Ukatu C, Vyas R, Vyas N, et al. Long-term experience of girdling the ascending aorta with Dacron mesh as definitive treatment for aneurysmal dilation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):S780–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SH, Kim JB, Kim DH, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, et al. Management of dilated ascending aorta during aortic valve replacement: valve replacement alone versus aorta wrapping versus aorta replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(4):802–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milgalter E, Laks H. Dacron mesh wrapping to support the aneurysmally dilated or friable ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52(4):874–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park JY, Shin JK, Chung JW, Kim JS, Chee HK, Song MG. Short-term Outcomes of Aortic Wrapping for Mild to Moderate Ascending Aorta Dilatation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;45(3):148–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tagarakis GI, Karangelis D, Baddour AJ, Daskalopoulos ME, Liouras VT, Papadopoulos D, et al. An alternate solution for the treatment of ascending aortic aneurysms: the wrapping technique. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Plonek T. A metaanalysis and systematic review of wrapping of the ascending aorta. J Card Surg. 2014;29(6):809–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akgun S, Atalan N, Fazliogullari O, Kunt AT, Basaran C, Arsan S. Aortic root aneurysm after off-pump reduction aortoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(5):e69–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer M, Grauhan O, Hetzer R. Dislocated wrap after previous reduction aortoplasty causes erosion of the ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(2):583–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dhillon JS, Randhawa GK, Straehley CJ, McNamara JJ. Late rupture after dacron wrapping of aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 1986;74(3 Pt 2):I11–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beller CJ, Labrosse MR, Thubrikar MJ, Szabo G, Robicsek F, Hagl S. Increased aortic wall stress in aortic insufficiency: clinical data and computer model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(2):270–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao F, Watanabe M, Matsuzawa T. Stress analysis in a layered aortic arch model under pulsatile blood flow. Biomed Eng Online. 2006;5:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto RJ, Wagenseil JE, DeLong WR, Peterson SJ, Kouchoukos NT, Sundt 3rd TM. Mechanical properties of dilated human ascending aorta. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30(5):624–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arsan S. Off-pump reduction aortoplasty and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(1):316–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arsan S, Akgun S, Kurtoglu N, Yildirim T, Tekinsoy B. Reduction aortoplasty and external wrapping for moderately sized tubular ascending aortic aneurysm with concomitant operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(3):858–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer M, Pasic M, Schaffarzyk R, Siniawski H, Knollmann F, Meyer R, et al. Reduction aortoplasty for dilatation of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(3):720–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Belov IV, Stepanenko AB, Gens AP, Savichev DD, Charchyan ER. Reduction aortoplasty for ascending aortic aneurysm: a 14-year experience. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009;17(2):162–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calcaterra D, Ueda K, Hashimi S, Brown T, Calva D. Repair of an ascending aortic aneurysm using reduction aortoplasty in a Jehovah’s Witness. J Card Surg. 2011;26(3):313–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrel T, von Segesser L, Jenni R, Gallino A, Egloff L, Bauer E, et al. Dealing with dilated ascending aorta during aortic valve replacement: advantages of conservative surgical approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;5(3):137–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feindt P, Litmathe J, Borgens A, Boeken U, Kurt M, Gams E. Is size-reducing ascending aortoplasty with external reinforcement an option in modern aortic surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31(4):614–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haddad R, Fagundes WV, Pinheiro BB. Reduction aortoplasty with external wrapping associated with aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009;24(2):194–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuralay E, Demirkilic U, Ozal E, Oz BS, Cingoz F, Gunay C, et al. Surgical approach to ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve. J Card Surg. 2003;18(2):173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niclauss L, Delay D, Ruchat P, von Segesser LK. Reduction aortoplasty: safe and durable treatment for borderline dilatation in selected patients. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21(5):584–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogus NT, Cicek S, Isik O. Selective management of high risk patients with an ascending aortic dilatation during aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002;43(5):609–15.Google Scholar
- Zhang H, Lu F, Qu D, Han L, Xu J, Ji G, et al. Treatment of fusiform ascending aortic aneurysms: a comparative study with 2 options. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(3):738–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doyle M, Peeceeyan S, Bonar F, Horton M. Rarefaction of the aorta under dacron wrap: a rare complication. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(2):341–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rylski B, Blanke P, Beyersdorf F, Desai ND, Milewski RK, Siepe M, et al. How does the ascending aorta geometry change when it dissects? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(13):1311–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.