- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Frozen elephant trunk reconstruction for right-sided aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and aneurysm of the descending aorta: a case report
© Kokotsakis et al. 2016
- Received: 17 November 2015
- Accepted: 2 May 2016
- Published: 5 May 2016
A 59-year old man being investigated for back pain was found to have aneurysmal dilatation of a right-sided aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta together with an aberrant left subclavian artery.
He underwent repair of this utilising the frozen elephant trunk technique, which dealt with all three pathologies in one-stage. He made an unremarkable recovery and was discharged home on the 8th post-operative day.
This case report further demonstrates the flexibility and safety of the frozen elephant trunk in dealing with complex aortic pathology as a single-stage procedure.
- Aortic arch
- Endovascular procedures
A right-sided aortic arch is an uncommon congenital lesion occurring in 0.05–0.10 % of the population. It is often associated with an aberrant left subclavian artery, and patients are particularly prone to developing aneurysm and dissection . The optimal approach to this condition requires meticulous planning and depends on the extent of aneurysm formation. We report the successful single stage repair of this vascular anomaly using the frozen elephant trunk technique.
After induction of anaesthesia, arterial lines were placed in the left femoral and both radial arteries. A lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drain was placed in order to manipulate cord perfusion pressure. A soft guidewire was placed in the right femoral artery (RFA) and advanced in to the arch. A median sternotomy was performed with left supraclavicular extension in order to expose the distal LSA. The right axillary artery (RAA) was exposed with an infraclavicular incision. After heparinization, a 8 mm graft was anastomosed to the RAA through this incision on the underside of the artery. The other end of the graft was tunnelled through the right pleural space in to the pericardial cavity and the arterial line (bifurcated) of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit was connected to this end. Examination of the aorta revealed no evidence of dissection or rupture.
After going on to CPB a right superior pulmonary vein vent was placed and the patient was cooled to 25 °C. During cooling the head and neck vessels were dissected out, and upon fibrillation the ascending aorta was clamped and transected just above the sinotubular junction. The heart was arrested using direct cold crystalloid cardioplegia. Subsequent shots were delivered retrogradely every 20 min. Once the target temperature was reached, CPB was arrested and the ascending aorta and part of the arch (up to 2 cm before the origin of the RSA) were resected. The LCCA and RCCA were transected 1 cm distal to their origin and the RSA was ligated at its origin from the aortic arch. Perfusion catheters were inserted in to the LCCA, the RCCA, and together with the RAA cannula already in place, continuous bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) was started.
At this point the soft guidewire in the RFA was exchanged for a stiff one. A hybrid stent-graft (E-vita OPEN PLUS 40 × 160 mm, Jotec Inc., Hechingen, Germany) was advanced in to the DTA in an antegrade fashion. The proximal landmark for stent deployment was just distal to the origin of the RSA. The incorporated polyester graft was cut back and sutured to the transected distal arch with interrupted horizontal mattress sutures (3-0 Prolene, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) reinforced with a strip of Teflon. A sterilized bronchoscope enabled the distal part of the stent graft to be checked under direct vision.
After complete rewarming the patient was separated from CPB uneventfully. The bypass times were as follows: CPB (160 mins), SACP (90 mins) and, distal ischaemic time (50mins). Following haemostasis, the synthetic grafts were covered with a strip of pericardium to exclude them from the sternal wound prior to routine closure. The patient was extubated 6 h following the operation and discharged on the 8th post-operative day at which point he was mobile and neurologically intact. Twelve-month follow-up with CTA confirmed satisfactory appearance of the reconstruction with absence of endoleak.
Right-sided aortic arch with ALSA is a rare congenital abnormality frequently associated with aneurysm and dissection. Whilst appropriate surgical indications are not yet clearly established, intervention in the asymptomatic is usually recommended for aneurysms over 3 cm . Meticulous pre-operative imaging and planning are essential. Current treatment options are tailored to the anatomical features (e.g., type I or II right-sided arch and the degree of aneurysm formation) of each case and include: right (or left) thoracotomy with replacement of the descending thoracic aorta and/or reconstruction of the ALSA, sternotomy and debranching of the arch vessels with subsequent thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), sternotomy and total arch replacement with insertion of elephant trunk and subsequent TEVAR, total arch replacement with subsequent thoracotomy for DTA replacement, arch replacement and DTA replacement through the clamshell approach, and left carotid to left subclavian artery bypass with ligation or coiling at the origin of the ALSA .
In this case we utilised the frozen elephant trunk technique in one-stage to deal with three pathologies: arch and descending aortic aneurysm together with an ALSA originating in a Kommerell’s diverticulum. To our knowledge, this is only the third such report in the literature [2, 3]. We consider it to be a safe and effective technique given the excellent outcome this patient achieved, especially as some of the above techniques are associated with very significant morbidity. There are now a number of other devices on the market (e.g., Thoraflex Hybrid), which would allow a similar or more advanced outcome to be achieved. Whilst it could be suggested that TEVAR(after debranching) is a less invasive option, this was not considered due to the acute angle between the distal arch and the DTA, which may have led to difficulty in securing a good proximal landing. Proceeding with TEVAR in such a situation may have led to incomplete treatment of the arch aneurysm and perhaps unwanted complications such as endoleak. A further disadvantage of this approach is that of embolic related complications in patients with extensive atheroma of the distal aorta. In retrospect, we could have simplified our operation further by establishing CPB via arch cannulation and reanastomosing the RSA to the new arch graft directly via the median sternotomy.
This case report demonstrates the flexibility and safety of the frozen elephant trunk in dealing with right-sided aortic arch aneurysms as a single-stage procedure.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Cina CS, Althani H, Pasenau J, Abouzahr L. Kommerell’s diverticulum and right-sided aortic arch:a cohort study and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(1):131–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Easo J, Holzl P, Dikov V, Chavan A, Dapunt O. Frozen elephant trunk procedure in a dextropositioned arch and descending aorta. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17(6):751–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munakata M, Itaya H, Fukui K, Ono Y. One-stage repair for aortic regurgitation and kommerell diverticulum with aneurysmal right aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(3):798–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar