Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Absence of association between whole blood viscosity and delirium after cardiac surgery: a case-controlled study

  • Shokoufeh CheheiliSobbi1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Mark van den Boogaard1,
  • Arjen J. C. Slooter4,
  • Henry A. van Swieten2,
  • Linda Ceelen1,
  • Gheorghe Pop3,
  • Wilson F. Abdo1 and
  • Peter Pickkers1
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery201611:132

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0517-9

Received: 8 December 2015

Accepted: 27 July 2016

Published: 5 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Delirium after cardiothoracic surgery is common and associated with impaired outcomes. Although several mechanisms have been proposed (including changes in cerebral perfusion), the pathophysiology of postoperative delirium remains unclear. Blood viscosity is related to cerebral perfusion and thereby might contribute to the development of delirium after cardiothoracic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether whole blood viscosity differs between cardiothoracic surgery patients with and without delirium.

Methods

In this observational study postoperative whole blood viscosity of patients that developed delirium (cases) were compared with non-delirious cardiothoracic surgery patients (controls). Cases were matched with the controls, yielding a 1:4 case–control study. Serial hematocrit, fibrinogen, and whole blood viscosity were determined pre-operatively and at each postoperative day. Delirium was assessed using the validated Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit or Delirium Screening Observation scale.

Results

In total 80 cardiothoracic surgery patients were screened of whom 12 delirious and 48 matched non-delirious patients were included. No significant difference was found between both groups in fibrinogen (p = 0.36), hematocrit (p = 0.23) and the area under curve of the whole blood viscosity between shear rates 0.02 and 50 s-1 (p = 0.80) or between shear rates 0.02 and 5 s-1 (p = 0.78).

Conclusion

In this case control study in cardiothoracic surgery patients changes in whole blood viscosity were not associated with the development of delirium.

Keywords

Cardiothoracic surgery Delirium Intensive care Medicine Whole blood viscosity

Background

Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by an acute onset of altered mental status, hallmarked by difficulty in sustaining attention with typically a fluctuating course [1]. Delirium occurs frequently in hospitalized patients, especially in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients [2]. In cardiothoracic surgery the incidence of delirium during the postoperative on the ICU is reported to be between 13 % and 42 % [3, 4]. Postoperative delirium in cardiothoracic surgery patients is associated with increased length of ICU and hospital stay, increased risk of sternal wound infection, unwanted removal of arterial/venous lines or epicardial electrodes, significantly impaired quality of life and higher long-term morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs [5, 6].

The pathophysiological mechanism of delirium is far from clear [7]. Apart from other possible pathways related to the development of delirium [8], reduced cerebral blood flow during delirium with normalization during recovery has been reported [9, 10]. Cerebral blood flow is strongly related to whole blood viscosity (WBV) [11]. Changes in blood viscosity occur post-cardiothoracic surgery [12]. As such, changes in blood viscosity could relate to occurrence of postoperative delirium and this could represent an important interventional target to prevent or treat delirium.

Blood viscosity is higher at low shear rates, e.g. in the microcirculation [13]. Therefore, an increased WBV leads to a larger reduction in microcirculatory blood flow compared to blood flow in larger blood vessels. Since cellular perfusion is dependent on microcirculatory flow [14] and blood viscosity affects microcirculatory flow, we hypothesized that changes in viscosity could be related to the development of delirium. The aim of our study was to investigate whether whole blood viscosity differs between cardiothoracic surgery patients with and without delirium.

Methods

Study design and patients

This is an exploratory, matched, case–control study carried out in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Annually approximately 1000 cardiothoracic patients are operated in the RadboudUMC. This study was approved by the medical ethical committee of Arnhem-Nijmegen (study number 2012/297) which waived the need for informed consent.

The study population consisted of patients of 50 years or older after an elective cardiothoracic surgical on-pump procedure for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or single heart valve surgery. For purpose of homogeneity of the total group, patients who underwent CABG combined with valve surgery were not included. Other exclusion criteria were the use of blood cardioplegia, since this is associated with the development of postoperative neurological events [15], preoperative use of heparin, since heparin could decrease the blood viscosity [16], extracorporeal circulation (ECC) time exceeding 120 min, because ECC time is associated with neurological injury [17], or inability to screen for delirium.

Patients developing delirium postoperatively were defined as cases, and patients in which no delirium occurred served as non-cases. The group of cases was matched 1 : 4 to controls to increase the power of the study. Matching was performed on several important preoperative and postoperative risk factors for the development of delirium [7]: gender, age, duration of surgery, aortic cross clamp (AOX) time, ECC time, severity of illness score (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II score), and risk of death after a heart operation (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (Euro score)).

Delirium screening

Delirium assessment was performed three times a day. In order to obtain maximal sensitivity and specificity we used a three way approach to diagnose delirium. Firstly, in the ICU the most specific and sensitive scoring test for delirium, the validated Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), was used by trained ICU nurses [18]. Secondly, for the non-ICU patients, on the cardiothoracic surgical ward, nurses used the validated Delirium Screening Observation (DOS) scale [19]. Unfortunately some patients are not diagnosed by validated tests [20]. Therefore, to not miss these patients nursing and medical files were screened for signs of delirium as the last approach [21]. Delirium was defined as having a positive CAM-ICU score, or a DOS scale ≥3. In order to maximize the sensitivity of the diagnosis delirium, we also checked the medical records when haloperidol was administered for treatment combined with delirium signs noted in the nursing or medical files in case of a negative CAM-ICU score.

Data collection and variables

Earlier studies show that changes in blood viscosity occurs immediately after induction of anesthesia, immediately after surgery, 1 and 2 days after surgery and normalizes between 3 and 4 days post-cardiothoracic surgery [12]. For this reason blood samples were collected at four time points: preoperatively, directly after the induction of anesthesia (T-1), within one hour of ICU admission (T0), day one (T24) and three days (T72) after cardiothoracic surgery. Blood was drawn from the central venous catheter. If this was not possible, blood was taken from an indwelling arterial catheter or by vena puncture. During each blood collection the most important determinants of WBV, hematocrit and serum fibrinogen, were also measured and taken into consideration during viscosity calculations [11, 22]. Also presence of diabetes mellitus, infection confirmed by appropriate culture, invasive mechanical ventilation and the mean of the following variables during postoperative ICU stay in both groups were registered: serum creatinine level, modification of diet in renal disease-glomerular filtration rate (MDRD-GFR), urea level, fluid balance, ejection fraction (EF), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), infusion rate of inotropes or vasopressors, partial thromboplastin time (PTT), glucose level, and temperature.

Whole blood viscosity measurement

WBV is the intrinsic resistance of blood as it flows through blood vessels and is mainly determined by the shear rate of the flow, the volume fraction of red blood cells (hematocrit (Hct)), the concentration of plasma proteins namely fibrinogen, red blood cell (RBC) aggregation and red cell deformation [10, 23]. Viscosity can be represented as a function between shear rate and shear stress. Shear rate indicates the velocity of the blood flow and shear stress is the force of blood against the vessel wall. Fibrinogen has a greater influence on whole blood viscosity at low shear rates than at high shear rates due to fibrinogen induced RBC aggregation at low shear rates [24]. The interaction of fibrinogen and hematocrit on viscosity can be represented by an estimate of yield shear stress (YSS). YSS is the force required to start movement in a blood vessel [11, 22]. Furthermore, blood viscosity is dependent on temperature, especially at a temperature below 35 °C and above 39 °C [25, 26].

WBV was measured using the Contraves LS300 Low Shear Viscometer (ProRheo, Germany) within 180 min after blood sampling. The setting of the viscometer was standardized for all samples . Briefly, all blood tubes were placed on a shaker in the time between blood collection and the viscosity measurement. The viscosity was measured at 37 ± 0.1 °C, and at 23 different clinically relevant shear rate intervals (0.02-50 s-1) to minimize measurement errors [24]. As a measure for WBV, the area under the viscosity-shear rate curve (AUC) was used. The AUCs’ between the shear rates 0.02 and 5 s-1 were adjusted for Hct since this has a major impact on blood viscosity at low shear rates [11, 24]. Adjustment was performed by dividing the blood viscosity between the shear rates 0.02 and 5 s-1 by Hct. This is an estimation of adjusted whole blood viscosity for Hct approximating the precise value [27]. In addition, the yield shear stress was analyzed to compare the influence of Hct and fibrinogen on WBV. YSS was calculated according to Equation 1 [11, 22].
$$ \mathrm{Y}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{S}=13.5\left({10}^{-6}\right){C}_f^2{\left(Hct-6\right)}^3 $$
(1)

Where Cf is the fibrinogen concentration in mg%.

Statistical analysis

We used a case:control ratio of 1:4, which resulted in a power of 94 %, with a two tailed alpha of 0.05. Student’s t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests were used depending on data distribution. The Chi-square test was used to test the dichotomous variables. Because of the high level of attrition Linear Mixed Model testing was used to study the association between blood viscosity, hematocrit, fibrinogen and delirium. A two tailed p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and GraphPad Prism 5.0 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

In total 80 cardiothoracic surgical patients were screened. Of these, 16 (20 %) developed delirium postoperatively. One non-delirious patient was excluded due to serious complications and sustained coma, five non-delirious and four delirious patients were excluded because of missing data. Subsequently 12 cases were matched with 48 non-cases. Nine patients developed delirium within 24 h, and 3 patients developed delirium within 72 h after surgery. Patient and demographic characteristics are depicted in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic variables of delirious and non-delirious patients

Characteristic

Delirious (N = 12)

Non-delirious (N = 48)

p-value

Age (years), (mean, SD)

69 (5.6)

65 (8.2)

0.16

Male, N (%)

8 (67 %)

36 (75 %)

0.56

Duration of surgery in minutes (mean, SD)

195 (73)

187 (50)

0.65

ECC-time (min), (mean, SD)

107 (43)

90 (21)

0.21

AOX-time (min), (mean, SD)

65 (22)

59.8 (17)

0.36

APACHE-II Score (mean, SD)

17 (4)

15 (4)

0.19

Euro score (mean, SD)

3.8 (2.0)

3.5 (2.0)

0.68

Serum creatinine level (μmol. L-1), (median, IQR)

87 (68–94)

81 (73–94)

0.72

MDRD-GFR (ml. min-1. 1.73 m-2), (median, IQR)

78 (59–90)

81 (64–90)

0.49

Urea level (mmol. L-1), (median, IQR)

8.0 (7.2–9.1)

7.3 (6.0–8.6)

0.20

Fluid balance (mL), (median, IQR)

909 (34–1171)

375 (-137–1121)

0.65

EF (%), (median, IQR)

60.0 (46.3–60.0)

55.0 (45.0–60.0)

0.40

MAP (mmHg), (median, IQR)

75 (68–77)

75 (71–83)

0.40

Admission of inotropes or vasopressors, N (%)

10 (83 %)

28 (58 %)

0.11

Duration of mechanical ventilation (≥24 h), N (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

N/A

PTT (sec), (median, IQR)

19 (18–21)

18 (18–19)

0.26

Diabetes mellitus, N (%)

0 (0 %)

5 (10 %)

0.83

Glucose level (mmol. L-1), (median, IQR)

7.9 (7.3–8.8)

7.6 (6.7–8.2)

0.36

Temperature (°C), (median, IQR)

36.6 (35.3–37.1)

36.6 (35.9–36.9)

0.93

Confirmed infection, N (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

N/A

Definition of abbreviations: ECC extracorporeal circulation, AOX aortic cross clamp, min minutes, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, Euro European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation, IQR interquartile range, MDRD-GFR modification of diet in renal disease-glomerular filtration rate, EF ejection fraction, MAP mean arterial blood pressure, N/A not applicable, PTT partial thromboplastin time, sec seconds, SD standard deviation

Postoperative levels of fibrinogen, hematocrit and whole blood viscosity

Pre-operative fibrinogen, Hct and WBV were comparable between groups (Fig. 1). In both groups fibrinogen levels and hematocrit decreased significantly after surgery (both p <0.001). No significant difference was found between both groups in reduction of fibrinogen (p = 0.36) and hematocrit (p = 0.23), Fig. 1. Postoperatively the AUC of WBV between shear rates 0.02 and 50 s-1 decreased significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). Again, there was no significant difference in this reduction between patients that developed delirium and those who did not (p = 0.80). The AUC of WBV between shear rates 0.02 and 5 s-1 remained similar over time in both groups and not different between both groups (p = 0.78) either. The AUC of blood viscosity adjusted for hematocrit was also comparable between the patients who developed delirium and those who did not (p = 0.33), (Figs. 1and 2). Finally, changes in the YSS were also not different between both groups (p = 0.68).
Fig. 1

Postoperative levels of hematocrit, fibrinogen and whole blood viscosity of delirious and non-delirious patients. a Hematocrit. b Fibrinogen. c The area under curve (AUC) of the whole blood viscosity (WBV) between shear rates 0.02 and 5 s-1. d The area under curve (AUC) of the whole blood viscosity (WBV) between shear rates 0.02 and 50 s-1. e The area under curve (AUC) of the whole blood viscosity corrected for hematocrit. T-1, directly after the induction of anesthesia. T0, within one hour of Intensive Care Unit admission. T24, one day after cardiothoracic surgery. T72, three days after cardiothoracic surgery. Data are expressed as mean and SD. Linear Mixed Model testing was used to determine a difference between the two groups. No significant differences were found. A two tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Fig. 2

Whole blood viscosity at 23 different shear rates between 0.02 and 50 s-1 of delirious and non-delirious patients. Log10 of whole blood viscosity versus log10 of shear rates. a Directly after the induction of anesthesia (T-1). b Within one hour of Intensive Care Unit admission (T0). C One day after cardiothoracic surgery (T24). d Three days after cardiothoracic surgery (T72)

Changes in the Hct, fibrinogen, WBV and YSS did not differ significantly in patients that developed delirium within 24 h and those that developed delirium after 48 h.

Discussion

We hypothesized that development of delirium in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients could be related to changes in blood viscosity. In line with such a hypothesis is the fact that reduced cerebral blood flow has been suggested to be a possible pathway for the occurrence of delirium. In addition, strokes and dementia are correlated with occurrence of delirium. Both strokes and dementia have been associated with high blood viscosity [28, 29] and both occur more frequently after cardiothoracic surgery. In this exploratory case–control study we did not find differences in the changes in hematocrit, fibrinogen levels or whole blood viscosity in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients who did or did not develop delirium. These findings indicate that changes in viscosity during the postoperative phase do not play a role in the development of post-operative delirium in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Even more so, the observed postoperative decrease of Hct and WBV provides no protection against delirium.

Although several studies have shown a strong correlation between whole blood viscosity and cerebral flow [11, 24], it appears plausible that due to low hematocrit levels after cardiothoracic surgery, the viscosity level is already so low, that moderate changes at this low level of blood viscosity do not affect cerebral blood flow. It has been shown, that a logarithmic correlation exists between hematocrit and whole blood viscosity, which is even stronger at lower shear rates [30]. Another reason why our hypothesis was not confirmed could be, that cerebral blood flow and delirium are not strongly correlated. However, earlier studies have demonstrated a correlation between decreased cerebral blood flow and delirium [9, 10].

The postoperative changes in WBV we observed are in accordance with previous reports in cardiothoracic surgery patients [12, 31]. However, in those studies, viscocity was only measured at a high shear rate (90 s-1), while in our study we measured viscosity at 23 different and at low shear rates. We found no postoperative changes in WBV at shear rates between 0.02 and 5 s-1 in cardiothoracic surgery patients. At low shear rates, red blood cells clump together due to fibrinogen induced RBC aggregation resulting in a higher viscosity which is dependent on both Hct and fibrinogen concentration [11, 24]. Therefore, unlike Papp et al. [12], we took a small part of the blood viscosity curve at low shear rates (between 0.02 and 5 s-1) and corrected for hematocrit. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between delirious and non-delirious patients.

Although duration of delirium is not a true reflection of severity of delirium, this is in several studies used as a measure for delirium severity. However, in our study the maximum delirium duration was 3 days (1 patient) and the rest had 1–2 days of delirium. For this reason we have treated delirium as a dichotomous variable. Data from other studies show that the median duration of delirium in cardiac surgery patients is two days [3, 32]. This is comparable to our data.

Some limitations of this study need to be considered. Firstly, the gold standard to diagnose delirium was not used. The gold standard is clinical research, performed by a psychiatrist, a neuropsychologist or a geriatrician. Delirium fluctuates during the day, therefore the gold standard is not always practical [33]. Instead of the gold standard, the internationally validated CAM-ICU and DOS scale performed by nurses were used to enable multiple assessments per day per patient [19]. At each nursing shift, patients were screened for delirium. Using multiple assessments per day increases the sensitivity of delirium diagnosis. In addition, in order to minimize under-diagnosis, the reports of the doctors and nurses were analyzed for indications of delirium in combination with the use of anti-psychotics. Secondly, in this study we included both the CABG as well as the aortic valve surgery patients. In comparison to closed heart surgery, patients undergoing open heart surgery have an increased risk for cerebral embolization [34, 35]. Although, the latter introduces heterogeneity, it results in data that can be generalized more easily to the daily practice of cardiac surgery. Finally, in this study 25 % of the data is missing. However, we used Linear Mixed Models testing in which it is allowed to have 25–30 % of missing [36].

Conclusion

In this group of cardiothoracic surgery patients no association was found between whole blood viscosity and the development of post-operative delirium. This finding indicates that in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients, delirium is probably not related to blood viscosity changes.

Abbreviations

AOX, aortic cross clamp; APACHE, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; AUC, area under the curve; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAM-ICU, confusion assessment method intensive care unit; Cf, fibrinogen concentration; DOS, delirium screening observation; ECC, extracorporeal circulation; EF, ejection fraction; Euro score, European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation; Hct, hematocrit; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; MAP, mean arterial blood pressure; MDRD-GFR, modification of diet in renal disease-glomerular filtration rate; N/A, not applicable; PTT, partial thromboplastin time; RBC, red blood cell; SD, standard deviation; WBV, whole blood viscosity; YSS, yield shear stress.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the nurses on the intensive care and medium care unit and cardiothoracic surgical ward for their help with the blood collections. They also would like to thank prof. dr. ir. Robert F. Mudde and L. Bergwerff MSc for their help with analysis of the data. Dr WF Abdo received financial support from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW Clinical Fellowship number 90715610).

Authors’ contributions

All authors participated in design of the study, collection of the data, analysis of the data and critically reviewed the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and gave consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboudumc
(2)
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboudumc
(3)
Department of Cardiology, Radboudumc
(4)
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht

References

  1. van den Boogaard M, Schoonhoven L, Maseda E, Plowright C, Jones C, Luetz A, Sackey PV, Jorens PG, Aitken LM, van Haren FM, Donders R, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Recalibration of the delirium prediction model for ICU patients (PRE-DELIRIC): a multinational observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(3):361–9. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-3202-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubois MJ, Bergeron N, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Delirium in an intensive care unit: a study of risk factors. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(8):1297–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. van den Boogaard M, Schoonhoven L, van der Hoeven JG, van Achterberg T, Pickkers P. Incidence and short-term consequences of delirium in critically ill patients: a prospective observational cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(7):775–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.016. Epub 2011 Dec 22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Koster S, Hensens AG, Schuurmans MJ, van der Palen J. Risk factors of delirium after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10(4):197–204. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Li HC, Chen YS, Chiu MJ, Fu MC, Huang GH, Chen CC. Delirium, Subsyndromal Delirium, and Cognitive Changes in Individuals Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;30(4):340–5. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000170.
  6. Krähenbühl ES, Immer FF, Stalder M, Englberger L, Eckstein FS, Carrel TP. Temporary neurological dysfunction after surgery of the thoracic aorta: a predictor of poor outcome and impaired quality of life. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(6):1025–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.058. Epub 2008 Mar 17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Van Rompaey B, Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Truijen S, Bossaert L. Risk factors for intensive care delirium: a systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24(2):98–107. Epub 2007 Oct 18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Flacker JM, Lipsitz LA. Neural mechanisms of delirium: current hypotheses and evolving concepts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(6):B239–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunther ML, Morandi A, Ely EW. Pathophysiology of Deliriumin in the Intensive Care Uni. Crit Care Clin. 2008;24(1):45–65. viii.Google Scholar
  10. Yokota H, Ogawa S, Kurokawa A, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow in delirium patients. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;57(3):337–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grotta J, Ackerman R, Correia J, Fallick G, Chang J. Whole blood viscosity parameters and cerebral blood flow. Stroke. 1982;13:296–301 doi:10.1161/01.
  12. Papp J, Toth A, Sandor B, Kiss R, Rabai M, Kenyeres P, et al. The influence of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on hemorheological parameters. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;49(1–4):331–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C. Vascular Wall Shear Stress: Basic Principles and Methods. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2005;46:9–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cipolla JM. The cerebral circulation. University of Vermont College of Medicine. San Rafael (CA): Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; 2009.Google Scholar
  15. Craver JM, Bufkin BL, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA. Neurologic events after coronary bypass grafting: further observations with warm cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59(6):1429–33. discussion 1433–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruggiero HA, Castellanos H, Caprissi LF, Caprissi ES. Heparin effect on blood viscosity. Clin Cardiol. 1982;5(3):215–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Czerny M, Krähenbühl E, Reineke D, Sodeck G, Englberger L, Weber A, Schmidli J, Kadner A, Erdoes G, Schoenhoff F, Jenni H, Stalder M, Carrel T. Mortality and neurologic injury after surgical repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest in acute and chronic proximal thoracic aortic pathology: effect of age on outcome. Circulation. 2011;124(13):1407–13. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010124. Epub 2011 Aug 29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1370–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Duursma SA. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: a screening instrument for delirium. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003;17(1):31–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gusmao-Flores D, Salluh JIF, Chalhub RÁ, Quarantini LC. The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Crit Care. 2012;16(4):R115. 10.1186/cc11407.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Inouye SK, Leo-summers ÃL, Zhang Y, Bogardus ST, Leslie DL, Agostini JV. A Chart-Based Method for Identification of Delirium : Validation Assessment Method. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(2):312–8.Google Scholar
  22. Merrill EW, Cheng CS, Pelletier GA. Yield Stress of Normal Human Blood as a Function of Endogenous Fibrinogen. J Appl Physiol. 1969;26(1):1–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fong TG, Bogardus ST, Daftary A. Interrelationship between delirium and dementia:cerebral perfusion changes in older delirious patients using 99mTc HMPAO SPECT. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61A:1294–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Pop G, Bisschops LL, Iliev B, Struijk PC, van der Hoeven JG, Hoedemaekers CW. On-line blood viscosity monitoring in vivo with a central venous catheter, using electrical impedance technique. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;41:595–601. doi:10.1016/j.bios.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ayres ML, Jarrett PEM, Browse NL. Blood viscosity, Raynaud’s phenomenon and the effect of fibrinolytic enhancement. Br J Surg. 1981;68(1):51–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cinar Y, Senyol AM, Duman K. Blood viscosity and blood pressure: role of temperature and hyperglycemia. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14(5 Pt 1):433–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Matrai A, Whittington RB, Ernst E. A simple method of estimating whole blood viscosity at standardized hematocrit. Clin Hemorheol. 1987;7:261–5.Google Scholar
  28. Park M-S, Kim B-C, Kim I-K, Lee S-H, Choi S-M, Kim M-K, Lee S-S, Cho K-H. Cerebral Infarction in IgG Multiple Myeloma with Hyperviscosity. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20(4):699–701. doi:10.3346/jkms.2005.20.4.699.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Grigg AP, Allardice J, Smith IL, Murray W, Horsfall D, Parkin D. Hyperviscosity syndrome in disseminated breast adenocarcinoma. Pathology. 1994;26(1):65–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Aronson HB, Cotev S, Magora F, Borman JB, Merin G. Blood viscosity and open heart surgery. A comparison of values in systemic and pulmonary blood vessels. Br J Anaesth. 1974;46(10):722–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Weaver JP, Evans A, Walder DN. The effect of increased fibrinogen content on the viscosity of blood. Clin Sci. 1969;36(1):1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koster S, Oosterveld FG, Hensens AG, Wijma A, van der Palen J. Delirium after cardiac surgery and predictive validity of a risk checklist. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(6):1883–7. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  34. Wolman RL, Nussmeier NA, Aggarwal A, Kanchuger MS, Roach GW, Newman MF, Mangano CM, Marschall KE, Ley C, Boisvert DM, Ozanne GM, Herskowitz A, Graham SH, Mangano DT. Cerebral injury after cardiac surgery: identification of a group at extraordinary risk. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group (McSPI) and the Ischemia Research Education Foundation (IREF) Investigators. Stroke. 1999;30(3):514–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ying Tan M, Amoako D. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2013. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkt022.
  36. Twisk JWR, Ellenberg SS, Elston R, Everitt B, Everitt BS, Harrell F. Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide for Medical Researchers (Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology). ISBN10-0521614988, ISBN13- 9780521614986.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement