Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Hegar–based method for aortic valve replacement in multiple valve surgery

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery201813:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0723-8

  • Received: 15 February 2018
  • Accepted: 27 April 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Small aortic annuli are a challenge and a proper valve size is needed to avoid important prosthesis-patient mismatch, especially in case of multiple valves surgery.

Case presentation

We proposed a technique involving the use of Hegar dilators in the aortic position while replacing the mitral valve, in order to maintain the proper aortic diameter. We used this method on two patients and we found it easy and reproducible.

Conclusions

We report neither operative nor postoperative complications.

Keywords

  • Mitral and aortic valve replacement
  • Tricuspid repair
  • Bivalvular replacement

Background

Small aortic annuli pose the challenge to correctly size the valve to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch. Especially in the setting of double or triple valve surgery this condition may increase the risk. [1] We describe a method based on the use of Hegar dilators in the aortic position to maintain the proper aortic annulus diameter while performing mitral valve replacement.

Case presentation

In this setting we prefer peripheral cannulation; if tricuspid valve surgery is required a femoral-jugular cannulation is chosen. After cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) institution and cardioplegic arrest of the heart the steps we follow are:
  1. I.

    the aorta is transversally opened and the valve excised. The annular stitches are passed in an everting fashion to fit the valve in the supra-annular position

     
  2. II.

    the left atrium is directly opened (or via the right atrium and the fossa ovalis if the tricuspid surgery is needed) and the mitral valve visualized and excised. The annular stitches are passed as usual

     
  3. III.

    the aortic annulus is measured and generally for the small annuli the maximum measure achievable is 19 mm (Fig. 1 a). Then it is gently enlarged (Fig. 1 b) with the proper Hegar sizer (i.e. 20 -21 mm if the relative prosthesis sizer is 19 mm), avoiding any improper stress and thus reducing the risk of annular damage or dehiscence

     
  4. IV.

    while the assistant keeps the Hegar within the aortic annulus (so above the left ventricular outflow tract in order to easily expose the mitral annulus), the mitral prosthesis is measured with the proper sizer, placed in the atrio-ventricular junction and tighten (Fig. 2 a)

     
  5. V.

    then the Hegar dilator is removed and the aortic valve replaced as usual (Fig. 2 b)

     
  6. VI.

    if tricuspid repair has to be performed the stitches are passed in the annulus after the mitral valve and tighten at the last

     
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Intraoperative image of the aortic annulus sizing (a). The Hegar dilators is utilized to softly enlarge the aortic annulus (b)

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Intraoperative image. The mitral valve is measured and then fixed while the Hegar dilator maintains the correct aortic annulus diameter (a) and then the aortic valve prosthesis (b) is positioned in a supra-annular manner

We performed this technique on two young women whom suffered from rheumatic multi valvular disease. The clinical and procedural features are listed in Table 1. We report neither procedural nor postoperative complications. The 1-year echocardiographic follow-up data showed a favorable outcome of the procedure (Table 2).
Table 1

Clinical and operative characteristics

Characteristics

# Patient 1

# Patient 2

Age

41 Years

39 Years

Bsa

1,46 m2

1,48 m2

Aortic annulus diameter

17 mm

17 mm

Tricuspid repair

Yes

No

Cardioplegia

Custudiol®

Custudiol®

Cpb time

192 min

171 min

Cross-clamp time

160 min

144 min

Aortic prosthesis diameter

19 mm

19 mm

Hegar aortic diameter

21 mm

20 mm

Mitral prosthesis diameter

25 mm

25 mm

Type of prosthesis

Biological

Mechanical

Tricuspid ring diameter

30 mm

/

CPB Cardio-Pulmonary Bypass, BSA Body Surface Area

Table 2

1-year follow-up data

Characteristics

# Patient 1

# Patient 2

Mean ventriculo-aortic gradient

13 mmHg

12 mmHg

Mean aortic valve area

1,78 cm2

1,97 cm2

Ejection fraction

64%

66%

Mean transmitral gradient

4 mmHg

5 mmHg

Spap

29 mmHg

37 mmHg

Mean right atrio-ventricular gradient

4 mmHg

4 mmHg

SPAP Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Discussion

Small body surface area and small aortic annulus always pose a challenge, especially if additional valve replacement/repair is required. Because of the anatomical position of the aortic annulus – comprised between the central fibrous body of the heart and the conus ligament of the pulmonary valve – it is pleonastic that multiple valvular annular plications may reduce the effective diameter and thus lead to an undersized aortic valve prosthesis and a severe prosthesis-patient mismatch may occur (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Drawning of long axis view showing in place Hegar dilator within the aortic root after suturing the aortic annulus and meanwhile suturing the mitral annulus

We describe this simple and reproducible method to maintain the proper aortic diameter while suturing and fixing the mitral prosthesis.

A word of caution must be said in the case of advanced rheumatic disease causing annular calcification and stiffness; in this case we suggest to do not force the Hegar diameter above 1 mm over the valvular tester measure.

Calafiore et al. [2] described another modified sequence of valvular preparation and fixation in case of small annulus that implies the removal of both the valves and the fixation of mitral prosthesis first and then the aortic one.

We decided to fix the mitral prosthesis first while maintaining the right aortic annular shape because we found very challenging to correctly tight the valve in the antero-lateral portion of the annulus once the aortic prosthesis is placed.

Conclusion

We report no complications in using this method. We believe that this could be useful in the setting of very small aortic annuli and concomitant mitral valve surgery.

Abbreviation

CPB: 

Cardio-pulmonary bypass

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thanks all the personnel involved in the clinical management of the patients.

Availability of data and materials

All the data presented are available.

Authors’ contributions

MG. Author of the text. MA. Supervisor. GP. Supervisor. GR. Drawning and data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our review board approve the work.

Consent for publication

The patients gave the consent to anonymous publication of the data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Via Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy
(2)
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

References

  1. Zogheib E, Lorne E, Nader J, Duveaub D, et al. Long term results of bivalvular mechanical replacement. A historical thirty year follow-up. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:290–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Calafiore AM, Iacoa AL, Shahb A, Di Mauroc M. Modified surgical sequence in aortic and mitral valve replacement with or without tricuspid valve repair or replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(6):e139–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement